KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Analysing the Effects of Assessment and Evaluation Applications and Exam Formats in Distance Education

Erdi Okan YILMAZ
Türker TOKER
Sayfa
165–176
Yayın Tarihi
2022-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings were discussed and reported with a literature review.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study examines the online assessment-evaluation activities in distance education processes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The population for online assessment-evaluation activities, exam types, and student achievement scores comprised 3830 courses by 805 academics over the Uşak University learning management system and 29511 students. organisThe data were analysed with descriptive statistics and t-tests for comparisons.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings were discussed and reported with a literature review.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Online exam · exam formats · e-assessment

Abstract

This study examines the online assessment-evaluation activities in distance education processes. The effects of different online exam application styles considering the online assessment-evaluation in distance education processes, including all programs of a higher education institution, were documented. The population for online assessment-evaluation activities, exam types, and student achievement scores comprised 3830 courses by 805 academics over the Uşak University learning management system and 29511 students. organisThe data were analysed with descriptive statistics and t-tests for comparisons. It was found that academics preferred multiple-choice exam formats more than online assignments or classical (written) ones. Moreover, students' success scores in multiple-choice exams were significantly higher than exams including open-ended questionsIt was also found that average exam success was higher when the questions were presented as separate but as a group. The findings were discussed and reported with a literature review.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, E. O., TOKER, T. (2022). Analysing the Effects of Assessment and Evaluation Applications and Exam Formats in Distance Education. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 165–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/768083

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Al-Hakeem, M. S., & Abdulrahman, M. S. (2017). Developing a new e-exam platform to enhance the university academic examinations: the case of Lebanese French University. I.J. Modern Education and Computer Science, 5, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2017.05.02
  2. Ann, M., & Christie, T. (2002). The role of classrooms in educational technology research: An example. Concord Consortium. https://concord.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/pdf/MTC.AERA02.rtf.pdf
  3. Ar, M. E. (2019). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerine yönelik geliştirilen nitelikli yaşam temelli açık uçlu soru hazırlama kursunun uygulanması ve değerlendirilmesi [Master thesis]. Uludağ University. Bahar, M., Nartgün, Z., Durmuş, S., & Bıçak, B. (2012). Geleneksel-tamamlayıcı ölçme ve değerlendirme teknikleri öğretmen el kitabı. Pegem Akademi. Baran, H. (2020). Açık ve uzaktan eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi,6(1), 28-40.
  4. Best, L. M., & Shelley, D. J. (2018). Academic dishonesty: Does social media allow for increased and more sophisticated levels of student cheating? International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 14(3), 1-14.
  5. Bilen, E., & Matros, A. (2021). Online cheating amid COVID-19. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 182, 196-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.004
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (24 Ed.). Pegem Akademi. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789756802748
  7. Can, E. (2020). Coronavirüs (Covid-19) pandemisi ve pedagojik yansımaları: Türkiye’de açık ve uzaktan eğitim uygulamaları. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 11-53.
  8. Chaudhary, S., & Dey, N. (2013). Assessment in open and distance learning system (odl): A challenge. Open Praxis, 207–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.3.65
  9. Çakan, M. (2011). Eğitim sistemimizde yaygın olarak kullanılan test türleri. In S. Tekindal, Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme (pp. 91-126).
  10. Pegem. DeFranzo, S. E. (2018). Advantages and disadvantages of open questions in course evaluations questions in course evaluations. Snapsurveys. https://www.snapsurveys.com/blog/advantages-disadvantages-open-questions-course-eval/
  11. Delandshere, G. (1990). Diagnostic assessment procedures. In H. Walberg, & G. Haertel, The international encyclopedia of educational evaluation (pp. 340-343).
  12. Pergamon Press.
  13. Demir, E. (2010). Uluslararası öğrenci değerlendirme programı (PISA) bilişsel alan testlerinde yer alan soru tiplerine göre Türkiye'de