Dergiler / International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Developing the Critical Thinking Skill Test for High School Students: A Validity and Reliability Study

Sayfa
130–142
Yayın Tarihi
2022-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the results of validity and reliability studies, it can be said that the CT test will yield valid and reliable results in measuring CT skills of high school students.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This research aimed to develop “Critical Thinking Skill Test for High School Students” to measure critical thinking (CT) skills of high school students.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For the CT test prepared based on the sub-skills of inference, evaluating arguments, deduction, recognizing assumptions and interpretation which are deemed to represent CT (Watson and Glaser, 1994), content validity and face validity were achieved with expert opinions and the table of specifications.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the results of validity and reliability studies, it can be said that the CT test will yield valid and reliable results in measuring CT skills of high school students.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Critical thinking skills · critical thinking test · measuring critical thinking skills

Abstract

This research aimed to develop “Critical Thinking Skill Test for High School Students” to measure critical thinking (CT) skills of high school students. For the CT test prepared based on the sub-skills of inference, evaluating arguments, deduction, recognizing assumptions and interpretation which are deemed to represent CT (Watson and Glaser, 1994), content validity and face validity were achieved with expert opinions and the table of specifications. Following the item difficulty and item discrimination analyses performed to test the construct validity, 34 items were omitted from the test which was finalized with 51 items. While mean item difficulty values of the sub-tests vary between 0.51 and 0.63, mean item discrimination values range from 0.35 to 0.49. The total test has a mean item difficulty value of 0.52 and a mean item discrimination value of 0.42. Decision-making skill was used to test the criterion-related validity of the test. KR20 reliability coefficients calculated for the sub-tests ranged from 0.62 to 0.75. A KR20 reliability coefficient of the total test was 0.87. Moreover, a correlation coefficient of 0.84 was calculated with the split-half method. To test time invariance of the test, the correlation values calculated between the results of the two applications which were performed three months apart ranged from 0.57 to 0.70. The correlation coefficient for the total test is 0.70. Based on the results of validity and reliability studies, it can be said that the CT test will yield valid and reliable results in measuring CT skills of high school students.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ORHAN, A., AY, Ş. Ç. (2022). Developing the Critical Thinking Skill Test for High School Students: A Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 130–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/768080

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Ay, Ş. &Akgöl, H. (2008). Critical thinking, gender, age and grade level. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 1(2), 65-75.
  2. Aybek, B. &Çelik, M. (2007). Watson-Glaser eleştirel akıl yürütme gücü ölçeğinin (W-GEAYGÖ) üniversite ikinci, üçüncü ve dördüncü sınıf İngilizce bölümü öğretmen adayları üzerindeki güvenirlik çalışması. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(1), 101-112.
  3. Aybek, B. (2006). The Effect of content and skill based critical thinking teaching on prospective teachers'disposition and level in critical thinking[Doctoral dissertation]. Çukurova University, Adana. Bailin, S. (1998). Critical thinking and drama education. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 3(2), 145-153.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş.& Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (16. edition). Pegem. Chance, P. (1986). Thinking in the classroom: A survey of programs. Teachers College, Columbia University. Crocker, L. &Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials for psychological testing. Harper & Row. Çıkrıkçı, N. (1993). Watson-Glaser eleştirel akıl yürütme gücü ölçeğinin (form Y M) lise öğrencileri üzerindeki ön deneme uygulaması. Ankara University Journal of Educational Sciences, 25(2), 559-569.
  5. Çıkrıkçı, N. (1996, June). Eleştirel düşünme: Bir ölçme aracı ve bir araştırma. III. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi, Adana. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. &Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (2.edition). Pegem. Çolakkadıoğlu, O. (2012). The reliability and validity study of adolescent decision making questionnaire for the high school students. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(19), 387-403.
  6. Demir, M. K. (2006). The research of fourth and fifth grade primary school students’ critical thinking levels in social studies lessons according to different variables. Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 26(3), 155-169.
  7. Eğmir, E. &Ocak, G. (2017). Eleştirel düşünme öğretim programının öğrencilerin eleştirel düşünme becerisi ve özdeğerlendirme düzeylerine etkisi. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 5, 138-156.
  8. Ennis, R. H. &Weir, E. (1985). The Ennis-Weir critical thinking essay test. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Press and software. Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking sk