Dergiler / International Journal of Politics and Security / 2020 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4 (Çin Özel Sayısı)

The Dynamics of Internationalization for the China in the Context of New Gramscianism

Sayfa
83–112
Yayın Tarihi
2020-08-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

For penetrating the idea, read Communist ideology, into the Western sphere of influence in the Third World, and on the globe in general, China put in motion the strategy of passive revolution via eco-soft power that is to be defined as an outward investment for attraction and persuasion through the material capacity to obtain consent (legitimacy).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The former Soviet Union lost the tug-of-war against the capitalist western hegemon United States of America as it got dissolved in 1991.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Our main argument is to make elaborations on what Cox theoretically put forward, upon which our assumption is that China wants to achieve what the former Soviet Union failed by using different, but not surprising, methodology: Not the war of movement based on the complete material power by disregarding other configurations of power as the former Soviet Union insisted on during the Cold War between 1945 up until its break down, but the war of position to achieve counter-hegemony against the West is the strategy of China.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:For penetrating the idea, read Communist ideology, into the Western sphere of influence in the Third World, and on the globe in general, China put in motion the strategy of passive revolution via eco-soft power that is to be defined as an outward investment for attraction and persuasion through the material capacity to obtain consent (legitimacy).
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:China · New Gramsci · Internationalization

Özet

The former Soviet Union lost the tug-of-war against the capitalist western hegemon United States of America as it got dissolved in 1991. The international system shifted dramatically from bipolarity to unipolarity for the benefit of the Pax Americana, and history was assumed to be ended in favor of it as clearly as indicated by Fukuyama in a brief account. In International Relations literature, it could be observed that there are many scholars like offensive neorealist John Mearsheimer who produced seminal studies drawing our attention on the pros and cons of rising power, China. Our main argument is to make elaborations on what Cox theoretically put forward, upon which our assumption is that China wants to achieve what the former Soviet Union failed by using different, but not surprising, methodology: Not the war of movement based on the complete material power by disregarding other configurations of power as the former Soviet Union insisted on during the Cold War between 1945 up until its break down, but the war of position to achieve counter-hegemony against the West is the strategy of China. For penetrating the idea, read Communist ideology, into the Western sphere of influence in the Third World, and on the globe in general, China put in motion the strategy of passive revolution via eco-soft power that is to be defined as an outward investment for attraction and persuasion through the material capacity to obtain consent (legitimacy).

Abstract

The former Soviet Union lost the tug-of-war against the capitalist western hegemon United States of America as it got dissolved in 1991. The international system shifted dramatically from bipolarity to unipolarity for the benefit of the Pax Americana, and history was assumed to be ended in favor of it as clearly as indicated by Fukuyama in a brief account. In International Relations literature, it could be observed that there are many scholars like offensive neorealist John Mearsheimer who produced seminal studies drawing our attention on the pros and cons of rising power, China. Our main argument is to make elaborations on what Cox theoretically put forward, upon which our assumption is that China wants to achieve what the former Soviet Union failed by using different, but not surprising, methodology: Not the war of movement based on the complete material power by disregarding other configurations of power as the former Soviet Union insisted on during the Cold War between 1945 up until its break down, but the war of position to achieve counter-hegemony against the West is the strategy of China. For penetrating the idea, read Communist ideology, into the Western sphere of influence in the Third World, and on the globe in general, China put in motion the strategy of passive revolution via eco-soft power that is to be defined as an outward investment for attraction and persuasion through the material capacity to obtain consent (legitimacy).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜÇYETMEZ, F. (2020). The Dynamics of Internationalization for the China in the Context of New Gramscianism. International Journal of Politics and Security, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4 (Çin Özel Sayısı), 83–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/768022

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Kaynakça Alcok McWilliams and David Siegel, Corporate social responsibility: a theory of firm perspective, Acad. Manage. Rev., 26 (1) (2001), pp. 117-127 Alfredo Saad-Filho and Alison J. Ayers, “Production, Class, and Power in the Neoliberal Transition: A Critique of Coxian Eclecticism,” in Ayers (ed.), Gramsci, Political Economy and International Relations Theory, (2015), p. 121. Alvin Y. So, “Beyond the Logic of Capital and the Polarization Model: The State, Market Reforms and the Plurality of Class Conflict in China,” Critical Asian Studies 37: 3 (2005), pp. 481–494.
  2. Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1971), pp. 5-7.
  3. Boycko, Maxim, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny, "A Theory of Privatization," mimeo., Harvard University (Massachusetts: University Press, 1993), pp. 99-101.
  4. Byrd, William, "Contractual Responsibility Systems in Chinese State-Owned Industry," in Advances in Chinese Industrial Studies, Vol. II (Greenwich: CT: JAI Press, 1991), p. 25. Byrd, William, "Contractual Responsibility Systems in Chinese State-Owned Industry," in Advances in Chinese Industrial Studies, Vol. II (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1991). Catherine Kingfisher and Jeff Maskovsky, “Introduction: The Limits of Neoliberalism,” Critique of Anthropology 28: 2 (2008), pp. 115–126.
  5. Chen Kuan, Wang Hongchang, Zheng Yuxin, Gary H. Jefferson, and Thomas G. Rawski, "Productivity Change in Chinese Industry: 1953-1985,"
  6. Journal of Comparative Economics, XII (London, UK: 1988), PP. 570-591. Chinese export growth slows to 3-year low, Jan. 2020, available at https://www.ft.com/content/39a57f14-367f-11ea-a6d3-9a26f8c3cba4. (28.04.2020). Clark Bai and Zenit Tao, multitask theory of state enterprise reform J. Comparat. Econ., 28 (4) (2000), pp. 716-738
  7. Clark Bai and Zenit Tao, How does privatization work in China? J. Comparat. Econ., 37 (3) (2009), pp. 453-470.
  8. Cox, Robert, “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, (1981) 10 (2): pp. 126–55.
  9. David Harvey, A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 121–135. Dollar David, "Economic Reform and Allocative Efficiency in China's State-Owned Industry," Economic Development and Cultural Change, XXXIV (Cambridge Press, 1990), pp. 89-105.
  10. Dux Chen and Xuan Jian, Dividends for tunneling in a regulated economy: The case of China Pacific-Basin Financ. J., 17 (2) (2009), pp. 209-223. Fulon