Dergiler / International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Determination of In Vitro Synergy of Ampicilin and Chloramphenicol against Multidrug Resistant Bacillus cereus Species

Sayfa
42–55
Yayın Tarihi
2022-04-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Furthermore, the observed synergy between ampicillin and chloramphenicol opens a new window of using bacteriocins and antibiotics in combination therapy of infections.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Nowadays, combination therapy has become one of the most effective clinical practices in treating infections due to the emergence of multi-resistant microorganisms.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of six selected antibiotics; ampicillin, gentamicin, tetracycline, rifampicin, chloramphenicol, and ciprofloxacin were screened towards five Bacillus cereus isolates; KS2, E2, F2, F6, and K2W2 isolated from aquaculture sources and river in Kukup, Johor, Malaysia.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Furthermore, the observed synergy between ampicillin and chloramphenicol opens a new window of using bacteriocins and antibiotics in combination therapy of infections.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Antibiotics · Bacillus cereus · Antibiotic resistance bacteria

Abstract

Nowadays, combination therapy has become one of the most effective clinical practices in treating infections due to the emergence of multi-resistant microorganisms. In this study, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of six selected antibiotics; ampicillin, gentamicin, tetracycline, rifampicin, chloramphenicol, and ciprofloxacin were screened towards five Bacillus cereus isolates; KS2, E2, F2, F6, and K2W2 isolated from aquaculture sources and river in Kukup, Johor, Malaysia. Determination of MICs on tested antibiotics showed that all B. cereus isolates were resistant towards ampicillin and rifampicin but most sensitive to chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin. Apart from that, this investigation also provides the synergistic effect of ampicillin and chloramphenicol against the B. cereus isolates. On contrary, K2W2 resulted as an antagonism while F6 resulted as indifference. In particular, synergy or double therapy of antibiotics may be required to treat multi-resistant organisms. Furthermore, the observed synergy between ampicillin and chloramphenicol opens a new window of using bacteriocins and antibiotics in combination therapy of infections.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ZAİN, N. A. M., HALİD, N. A. M. A., YERN, K. K., DANA, A. (2022). Determination of In Vitro Synergy of Ampicilin and Chloramphenicol against Multidrug Resistant Bacillus cereus Species. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 42–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/767615

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Blair, J.M.A., Webber, M.A., Baylay, A.J., Ogbolu, D.O. and Piddock, L.J. V. (2014), “Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance”, Nature Reviews Microbiology, Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved., Vol. 13, p. 42
  2. Li, B. and Webster, T.J. (2018), Bacteria antibiotic resistance: New challenges and opportunities for implant-associated orthopedic infections, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 22–32
  3. Munita, J.M. and Arias, C.A. (2016), “Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance”, Microbiology Spectrum, Vol 4 No. 2, pp. 1-37
  4. Abebe, E., Tegegne, B., Tibebu, S., Medicine, V. and Box, P.O. (2016), “A Review on Molecular Mechanisms of Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics”, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 301–310
  5. Fletcher, S. and Fletcher, S. (2015), “Understanding the contribution of environmental factors in the spread of antimicrobial resistance”, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, Springer Japan, pp. 243–252
  6. Economou, V. and Gousia, P. (2015), “Agriculture and food animals as a source of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria”, Infection and Drug Resistance, Vol 8, pp. 49-61
  7. Karam, G., Chastre, J., Wilcox, M.H. and Vincent, J.L. (2016), “Antibiotic strategies in the era of multidrug resistance”, Critical Care, Critical Care, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 1–9
  8. Ripa, M., Rodríguez-Núñez, O., Cardozo, C., Naharro-Abellán, A., Almela, M., Marco, F., Morata, L., et al. (2017), “Influence of empirical double-active combination antimicrobial therapy compared with active monotherapy on mortality in patients with septic shock: A propensity score-adjusted and matched analysis”, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol. 72 No. 12, pp. 3443–3452
  9. Pena-Miller, R., Laehnemann, D., Jansen, G., Fuentes-Hernandez, A., Rosenstiel, P., Schulenburg, H. and Beardmore, R. (2013), “When the Most Potent Combination of Antibiotics Selects for the Greatest Bacterial Load: The Smile-Frown Transition”, PLoS Biology, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 14–16
  10. Rainwater, F. & Thatcher, L. (1960). Methods for collection and analysis of water samples. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office
  11. Vijayabaskar, P. & Somasundaram, S.T. (2008). Isolation of Bacteriocin Producing Lactic Acid bacteria from fish gut and probiotic activity against common fresh water fish pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila. Biotechnology, 7(1), 124−128
  12. Junior, J.C.R., Tamanini, R., Soares, B.F., de Oliveira, A.M., de Godoi Silva, F., da Silva, F.F.,