Dergiler / International Journal of Educational Research Review / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Early Mathematics Teaching Profiles

Sayfa
288–302
Yayın Tarihi
2019-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Implications of results for early math professional development are discussed.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Responding to the scarcity of research on early mathematics teaching profiles, this article reports on a novel assessment approach to identifying characteristics of early mathematics teaching occurring in early childhood settings.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, 210 pre -kindergarten to 3rd grade teachers in a large public school system in the Midwest were observed as they taught mathematics.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Implications of results for early math professional development are discussed.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Teaching Profession · Pedagogical Formation · Attitude

Abstract

Responding to the scarcity of research on early mathematics teaching profiles, this article reports on a novel assessment approach to identifying characteristics of early mathematics teaching occurring in early childhood settings. The new approach uses the interplay between teachers’ content knowledge in mathematics, knowledge of students and learning, and knowledge of how to teach mathematics effectively during the course of early mathematics as a proxy to identify quality of mathematics instruction provided. In this study, 210 pre -kindergarten to 3rd grade teachers in a large public school system in the Midwest were observed as they taught mathematics. The descriptive results revealed that the quality of mathematics instruction varies considerably among early childhood teachers. Some teachers are identified as delivering high quality mathematics instruction because they provide students with opportunities to fully and purposefully engage in deepening their understanding of important mathematics concepts, whereas others are rated as far lower in quality, because their mathematics teaching is procedural in terms of content emphasized and instructional strategies used. As a whole, observed quality of mathematics teaching was revealed to be mediocre. Implications of results for early math professional development are discussed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CEREZCI, B. (2019). Early Mathematics Teaching Profiles. International Journal of Educational Research Review, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 288–302. https://ajindex.com/articles/766326

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Armstrong, A., Ginet, L., & Warisi, S. (2012, January). Exploring early math teaching and learning in community college ECE programs. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Illinois Education Research Council, Tinley Park, IL. Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 699-713.
  2. Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466.
  3. Ball, D. L. (1991). What's all this talk about "discourse"? Arithmetic Teacher, 39(3), 44-48.
  4. Ball, D. L., & Rowan, B. (2004). Introduction: Measuring instruction. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 3-10.
  5. Baroody, A.J. (2001). Early number instruction. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(3), 154-158.
  6. Baroody, A. J., & Dowker, A. (2003). The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Bodovski, K & Farkas, G. (2007) Mathematics Growth in Early Elementary School: The Roles of Beginning Knowledge, Student Engagement and Instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 108(2), 115-130.
  7. Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling- Hammond and J. Bransford (Eds.). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. (1-39). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass. Brenneman, K., Boller, K., Atkins-Burnett, S., Stipek, D., Forry, N., Ertle, B., French, L., Ginsburg, H., Frede, E. & Schultz T. (2011). Measuring the quality of early childhood math and science curricula and teaching. In M Zaslow, I. Martinez-Beck, K. Tout & T. Halle (Eds.), Quality Measurement in Early Childhood Settings (pp.77-103). Baltimore Maryland: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co. Brophy, J. E. (1991). Conclusion to advances in research on teaching, Vol. II: Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to teaching practice. In Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 2 Teachers’ subject matter knowledge and classroom instruction (pp. 347-362).
  8. Greenwich, CT: JIA Press.
  9. Brown, E. T. (2005). The influence of teachers’ efficacy and beliefs regarding mathematics instruction in the early childhood classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26, 239-257.
  10. Bursal, M. & Paznokas, L. (2006). Mathematics anxiety and preservice elementary teachers’ confidence to teach mathematics and scienc