Dergiler / Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

TO MAINTAIN THE HISTORICAL SACRED SPACES: ANKARA-HACI BAYRAM DISTRICT

Sayfa
257–267
Yayın Tarihi
2019-06-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, the Temple of Augustus, which dates back to the 2nd century BC, and the Mosque of Hacı Bayram, which built on the ruins of this temple in the 15th century were investigated their architectural characteristics together with their sacred values.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Historical sacred places create and strengthen urban identity and memory as “memory carriers” with their social, ideological, belief-related, and physical characteristics that they have accumulated within the historical process.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, this relationship established between memory, sacredness and space is explained through Hacı Bayram District which located in ancient core also sacred hill of Ankara City.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, the Temple of Augustus, which dates back to the 2nd century BC, and the Mosque of Hacı Bayram, which built on the ruins of this temple in the 15th century were investigated their architectural characteristics together with their sacred values.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Maintain · Historical sacred space · Augustus Temple

Abstract

Historical sacred places create and strengthen urban identity and memory as “memory carriers” with their social, ideological, belief-related, and physical characteristics that they have accumulated within the historical process. In this study, this relationship established between memory, sacredness and space is explained through Hacı Bayram District which located in ancient core also sacred hill of Ankara City. Thus, the Temple of Augustus, which dates back to the 2nd century BC, and the Mosque of Hacı Bayram, which built on the ruins of this temple in the 15th century were investigated their architectural characteristics together with their sacred values.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜLTEKİN, N. T., CANBOLAT, A. N. (2019). TO MAINTAIN THE HISTORICAL SACRED SPACES: ANKARA-HACI BAYRAM DISTRICT. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 257–267. https://ajindex.com/articles/759868

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (20)

  1. Yeğin, H., “Din Psikolojisi Açısından Kutsal Mekan İnsan İlişkisi ”, Harran Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1-2):53-91,(2012)
  2. Eliade, M., Dinler Tarihine Giriş, (çev. L. A. Özcan), Alfa Mitoloji-Yayın,İstanbul, (2017-a)
  3. Kaynak, İ. H., “Dinlerde kutsal zaman ve mekanın tarihsel yapısının fenomenolojik algısı”, SUTAD, 39:443-455,(2016)
  4. Özel, M. K., “Dini Mimaride Merkez Kavramı”, (yayınlanmamış Y. Lisans Tezi), Mimar Sinan Güzel sanatlar Üniversitesi, İstanbul, 8-21(1998)
  5. Örenç, A. “Hadislerde Kutsal Mekan Algısı", (yayınlanmamış Dr. Tezi), Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Isparta, 78-80 (2013)
  6. Arslan, M., “Modern Mekanda Kutsal Deneyimi, Kernek'te Yeniden Üretilen Kutsal Mit ve Ritüel, Birey ve Toplum, 3(6): 7-36. (2013)
  7. Yavuz, Ö. F., “Kuran'da kutsal mekan, zaman ve eşya kavramlarının sembolik değeri, Milel ve Nihal, 17(27): 37-65, (2005)
  8. UNESCO, Global Strategy (1994).
  9. ICOMOS, The Nara Document on Authenticity (1994).
  10. ICOMOS, the World Heritage List – Filling the Gaps An Action Plan For The Future. Monuments and Sites XII, Biedermann GmbH Offsetdruck, München: (2005)
  11. ICOMOS, Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Heritage Sites (2008).
  12. ICOMOS, International Conference on Religious Heritage towards Understanding the OUV of Religious Heritage (ed.ICOMOS), Korea (2015)
  13. Eliade, M., Kutsal ve Kutsal Dışı (çev. Ali Berktay), Alfa Mitoloji-Yayın,İstanbul, (2017-b)
  14. Turgut Gültekin, N. and Canbolat, A. N., “To Identification of Immovable and Intangible Cultural Values of Sacred Historical Buildings Together”, Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 8 (4), 63-84, (2018)
  15. Buluç, S., “İlkçağda Ankara”, Ankara Dergisi, 1 (2), 13-28, (1991)
  16. Erzen, A., İlçağda Ankara, TTK. Basımevi, Ankara (1946)
  17. Aktüre, S., “16. yüzyıl öncesi Ankara' sı üzerine bilinenler, (ed A.Yavuz) Tarih İçinde Ankara, Ankaralılar Derneği Yayın, 1-47, (2000)
  18. Akurgal, E., Ancient civilisations and ruins of Turkey, Phoenix Press, İstanbul (2016)
  19. Akurgal, E. “Agustus Tapınağı ve Yazıtların Kraliçesi", Ankara Dergisi, 1(1):16-35,(1990)
  20. Güven, S., “Displaying the Res Gestae of Augustus: a monument of imperial image for all”, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 57(1):30-45,(1998)