Dergiler / European Annals of Dental Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region

Sayfa
52–56
Yayın Tarihi
2021-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM and internal and marginal discrepancies were at clinically acceptable intervals

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: Long-term clinical success is closely related to the internal and marginal adaptation of the restorations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials & Methods: Four-unit porcelain-fused to zirconia fixed dental prostheses were fabricated with CAD-CAM system in 20 patients.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM and internal and marginal discrepancies were at clinically acceptable intervals
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:CAD/CAM · internal discrepancy · marginal discrepancy

Abstract

Purpose: Long-term clinical success is closely related to the internal and marginal adaptation of the restorations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the internal adaptation of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses in the posterior region. Materials & Methods: Four-unit porcelain-fused to zirconia fixed dental prostheses were fabricated with CAD-CAM system in 20 patients. For the evaluation of the restorations’ internal fit, conventional silicone replicas were used with the optical microscope. The obtained silicone impression was cut to obtain two cross-sections from buccolingual and 3 from mesiodistal. Fifty different measurements were taken from every tooth by taking 10 from each cross- section; 2 from the margin, 6 from the axial surfaces and 2 from the occlusal by the optical microscope. Results: There were statistically significant differences in internal discrepancy in terms of area and tooth type. The average internal discrepancy on the axial surfaces of the molars was 142.39±47.42µm. In premolars, the mean was 139.53±46.80µm. The average of the internal discrepancy values obtained from occlusal surfaces of the molar teeth was 164.39±53.61µm, whereas the same average for the premolar teeth was 161.92±60.54µm. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM and internal and marginal discrepancies were at clinically acceptable intervals

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BÜYÜKDERE, A. K., SERTGÖZ, A. (2021). The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region. European Annals of Dental Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 52–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/757237

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Tabata LF, de Lima Silva TA, de Paula Silveira AC, Ribeiro APD. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM composite resin and ceramic crowns before and after internal adjustment. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(3):500–505. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.010
  2. Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kästner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(4):419–24. doi:10.1067/mpr.2000.109125
  3. Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):545–551. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.001. 4. de Paula Silveira AC, Chaves SB, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):386–392. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.017
  4. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(4):394–404. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70002- 2
  5. Oz FD, Bolay S. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Strength of Different Ceramic Inlays Produced by CEREC Omnicam and Heat- Pressed Technique. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:5152703. doi:10.1155/2018/5152703
  6. Padrós R, Giner L, Herrero-Climent M, Falcao-Costa C, Ríos-Santos JV, Gil FJ. Influence of the CAD-CAM Systems on the Marginal Accuracy and Mechanical Properties of Dental Restorations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(12). doi:10.3390/ijerph17124276
  7. Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64(1):18–24. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(90)90147-5
  8. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent. 2001;26(4):367–74
  9. Nissan J, Rosner O, Rosen G, Naishlos S, Zenziper E, Zelikman H, et al. Influence of Vinyl Polysiloxane Impression Techniques on Marginal Fit of Metal Frameworks for Fixed Partial Dentures. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(20). doi:10.3390/ma13204684
  10. Al Mortadi N, Bataineh K, Al Janaideh M. Fatigue Failure Load of Molars with Thin-Walled Prosthetic Crowns Made of Various Materials: A 3D-FEA Theoretical Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020;12:581–593. doi:10.2147/ccide.S286826
  11. Malone W, Koth D. Tylman’s Theory and Practice of Fixed Prosthodontics. 8 [sup] th ed. Missouri: Ishiyaku Euro America. 1989:237–