KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / European Annals of Dental Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow

Ece İrem OĞUZ
Mehmet Ali KILIÇARSLAN
Sayfa
119–123
Yayın Tarihi
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The patient was satisfied and the restorations have been in service for two years.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Zirconia has become a popular restorative material regarding the mechanical and biocompatibility advantages.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Also, digital fabrication of zirconia not only enables accurate restorations but also provides time efficiency.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The patient was satisfied and the restorations have been in service for two years.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:zirconia · monolithic · CAD/CAM

Abstract

Zirconia has become a popular restorative material regarding the mechanical and biocompatibility advantages. Monolithic and translucent forms of zirconia advanced the aesthetics of this material, making it the material of choice for both tooth- and implant- supported restorations. Also, digital fabrication of zirconia not only enables accurate restorations but also provides time efficiency. The present case report demonstrates the rehabilitation of a patient who has generalized tooth wear with implant- and tooth-supported monolithic zirconia restorations with buccal veneers in a newly established occlusal vertical dimension. The treatment process was completed in a digital workflow as the impressions were taken with a powder-free intraoral scanner and the digital data were send to the dental laboratory to fabricate the restorations. Monolithic zirconia restorations with buccal feldspathic veneers were completed without any adjustments in only two appointments. The patient was satisfied and the restorations have been in service for two years.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OĞUZ, E. İ., KILIÇARSLAN, M. A. (2021). Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow. European Annals of Dental Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 119–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/757225

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Papaspyridakos P, Chochlidakis K, Kang K, Chen YW, Alghfeli A, Kudara Y, et al. Digital Workflow for Implant Rehabilitation with Double Full-Arch Monolithic Zirconia Prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(6):460-5
  2. Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC. CAD/CAM Ceramic Restorative Materials for Natural Teeth. J Dent Res. 2018;97(10):1082-91
  3. Stawarczyk B, Frevert K, Ender A, Roos M, Sener B, Wimmer T. Comparison of four monolithic zirconia materials with conventional ones: Contrast ratio, grain size, four-point flexural strength and two-body wear. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;59:128-38
  4. Marchack BW, Sato S, Marchack CB, White SN. Complete and partial contour zirconia designs for crowns and fixed dental prostheses: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106(3):145-52
  5. Diéguez-Pereira M, Chávarri-Prado D, Estrada-Martínez A, Pérez-Pevida E, Brizuela-Velasco A. Monolithic and Minimally Veneered Zirconia Complications as Implant-Supported Restorative Material: A Retrospective Clinical Study up to 5 Years. BioMed Research International. 2020;2020:8821068
  6. Worni A, Katsoulis J, Kolgeci L, Worni M, Mericske-Stern R. Monolithic zirconia reconstructions supported by teeth and implants: 1- to 3-year results of a case series. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(6):459-67
  7. Sadowsky SJ. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review. Dent Mater. 2020;36(1):1-8
  8. Abdulmajeed AA, Lim KG, Närhi TO, Cooper LF. Complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(6):672-7.e1
  9. Sudhir N, Chittaranjan B, Kumar BA, Taruna M, Kumar MP, Reddy MR. Digital Cephalometric Tracings by PRO-CEPH V3 Software for Comparative Analyses of Vertical Dimension in Edentulous Patients. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(5):ZC01-5
  10. Guichet DL. Digital Workflows in the Management of the Esthetically Discriminating Patient. Dent Clin North Am. 2019;63(2):331-44
  11. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(4):383-8
  12. Juntavee N, Sirisathit I. Marginal accuracy of computer-aided design- and computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated full-arch zirconia restoration. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018;10:9-17
  13. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM