Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Soil Science / 2014 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Determination of plant available boron in agricultural soil by using voltammetric method

Sayfa
182–188
Yayın Tarihi
2014-11-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A great advantage of voltammetry over the spectrophotometric method is found to be simplicity, selectivity and shortening of the analysis time.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, a novel voltammetric method has been developed to determine the amount of boron in soil. 50 soil samples were collected from 5 typical sites of agricultural area.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The optimum scan rate, stirring rate, deposition potential, deposition time and pH values were determined as 5 mVs-1 , 200 rpm, -0.5 V (vs.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A great advantage of voltammetry over the spectrophotometric method is found to be simplicity, selectivity and shortening of the analysis time.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Voltammetric method · soil analysis · boron

Abstract

In this study, a novel voltammetric method has been developed to determine the amount of boron in soil. 50 soil samples were collected from 5 typical sites of agricultural area. After hot water extraction of available boron in the soil samples, all boron is complexed by addition of Alizarin Red S (ARS) to the extraction solutions.Differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry was used to determine the amount of the boron complexes. The electrochemical parameters have been optimized according to the experimental results. The optimum scan rate, stirring rate, deposition potential, deposition time and pH values were determined as 5 mVs-1 , 200 rpm, -0.5 V (vs. Ag/AgCl, sat.), 15sec. and 7.5, respectively. An oxidation peak was occurred at the peak potential of -0.45 V for Boron-Alizarin complex. The limit of detection, limit of quantification and linear working range were determined for the voltammetric soil-boron analysis. In addition, the interference effects of coexisting ions were successfully investigated. Comparison of the analytical data for analyzing real samples was carried out between the differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetric method and the Azometine H spectrophotometric method have shown good agreement. A great advantage of voltammetry over the spectrophotometric method is found to be simplicity, selectivity and shortening of the analysis time.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇETİNKAYA, E., DÖNMEZ, K. B., DEVECİ, S., DOĞU, M., ŞAHİN, Y. (2014). Determination of plant available boron in agricultural soil by using voltammetric method. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 182–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/756879

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Buffle, J., Tercier-Waeber, M.L., 2005. Voltammetric environmental trace-metal analysis and speciation: from laboratory to in situ measurements. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 24(3): 172–191
  2. Economou, D.D., Vaulgarapoulos, A., 2004. A study of pencil-lead bismuth- film electrodes for the determination of traze metals by anodic stripping voltammetry. Analytica Chimica Acta 519: 167-172
  3. Farghaly, O.A., Ghandour, M.A., 2005, Square-wave stripping voltammetry for direct determination of eight heavy metals in soil and indoor-airborne particulate matter. Environmental Research 97: 229-235
  4. Ibekwe, A.M., Poss, J.A., Grattan, S.R., Grieve, C.M., Suarez, D., 2010. Bacterial diversity in cucumber (Cucumus sativus) rhizosphere in response to salinity, soil pH, and boron. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42: 567-575
  5. Jung, W., Jang, A., Bishop, P.L., Chong, H.A., 2011. A polymer lab chip sensor with microfabricated planar silver electrode for continuous and on-site heavy metal measurement. Sensors & Actuators, B: Chemical 155:145-153
  6. Kelling, K.A., 1999. Soil and applied boron. Understanding Plant Nutrients, A 2522. Available at. http://www.soils.wisc.edu/extension/pubs/A2522.pdf
  7. Kumar, M.P., Reddy, T.M., Nithila, P., Reddy,S.J., 2005. Distribution of toxic trace metals Zn,Cd,Pb and Cu in Tirupati soils, India. Soil & Sediment Contamination 14:471-478
  8. Lehto, T., Ruuhola, T., Dell, B., 2010. Boron in forest trees and forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 2053-2069
  9. Merdivan, E., Benibol, Y., Seyhan, S., 2009. Flourimetric detection of boron by azomethine-H in micellar solution and solgel. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 71: 2045-2049
  10. Nedeltcheva, T., Atanassova, M., Dimitrov, J., Stanislavova, L., 2005. Determination of mobile form contents of Zn, Cd, Pb and Cu in soil extracts by combined stripping voltammetry. Analytica Chimica Acta 528: 143-146
  11. Opydo, J., 2008, Determination of manganese in soil extracts by stripping voltammetry. Proceedings of ECOpole Vol. 2, No. 2 Özcan, A., Şahin, Y., 2011, A novel approach forthe determination of paracetamol based on reduction of N-acetyl-p-benzoquinonemine formed on the electrochemically treated pencil graphite electrode. Analytica Chimica Acta 685: 9-14
  12. Ried, R., 2010. Can we really increase yields by making crop plants tolerant to boron toxicity? Plant Science 178: 9-11
  13. Segura, R., Toral, M.I., Arancibia, V., 2008. Determination of iron in water samples by adsorptive stripping vol