Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Soil Science / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Spatial distribution of heavy metals density in cultivated soils of Central and East Parts of Black Sea Region in Turkey

Sayfa
197–205
Yayın Tarihi
2017-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, in some regions of the study area, the Cd, Cu and Zn contents were also slightly raised, this case possibly stem from excessive P fertilization and field traffic.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Heavy metal contamination has caused serious environmental and health-related problems around the world.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To identify the concentrations and sources of heavy metals, 3400 surface soil samples (0-20 cm depth) were collected from the study area.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, in some regions of the study area, the Cd, Cu and Zn contents were also slightly raised, this case possibly stem from excessive P fertilization and field traffic.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Heavy metal contamination · GIS · soil properties

Abstract

Heavy metal contamination has caused serious environmental and health-related problems around the world. To identify the concentrations and sources of heavy metals, 3400 surface soil samples (0-20 cm depth) were collected from the study area. Subsequently, the concentrations of Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in the samples were measured. In order to evaluate natural or anthropogenic sources of heavy metal content and their spatial distribution in agricultural fields of Central and East Parts of Black Sea Region soil geostatistic approach were combined with geographic information system (GIS). GIS technology was employed to produce spatial distribution maps of the 6 elements in the study area. The results showed that the concentration of Ni and Co exceeded its threshold level. The local pollution from Ni was attributed to the natural influences. The concentrations of the other heavy metals are relatively lower than the critical values. The mean values of the heavy metal contents arranged in the following decreasing order: Ni > Zn > Cu >Pb> Co > Cd in the study area. On the other hand, according to distribution ratio of heavy metals in total soil samples, except for Co and Ni distribution in total soil samples, all other heavy metal element exceeded concentration in samples were determined about less than 10% total soil samples. However, in some regions of the study area, the Cd, Cu and Zn contents were also slightly raised, this case possibly stem from excessive P fertilization and field traffic.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ozyazici, M. A., Dengiz, O., Ozyazici, G. (2017). Spatial distribution of heavy metals density in cultivated soils of Central and East Parts of Black Sea Region in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 197–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/756663

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Albasel, N., Cotteni, A., 1985. Heavy metal contamination near major high ways, industrialand urban areas in Belgian grassland. Water Air Soil Pollution 24(1): 103-109.
  2. Ali, M., Elhagwa, A., Elfaki, J., Sulieman, M., 2017. Influence of the artisanal gold mining on soil contamination with heavy metals: A case study from Dar-Mali locality, North of Atbara, River Nile State, Sudan. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 6(1): 28-36. Anonymous, 2001. Regulation for Control of Soil Pollution in Official Gazette. 31.05.2005/25831, p. 33-34.
  3. Datsenko, V.V., Khimenko, N., L.2016. Evaluation of heavy metal complex phytotoxicity. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 5(3): 249-254.
  4. De Temmerman, L., Vanongeval, L., Boon, W., Hoenig, M., 2003. Heavy metal content of arable soil in Northern Belgium. Water Air Soil Pollution 148(1): 61-76.
  5. Dogan, H.M., Yilmaz, D.S., Kilic, O.M., 2013. Orta Kelkit Havzası’nın bazı toprak özelliklerinin ters mesafe ağırlık yöntemi (IDW) ile haritalanması ve yorumlanması. Gaziosmanpaşa Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi 6: 46-54. [in Turkish] Goovaerts, P., 1997. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press,
  6. New York, USA. 483 p. Isaaks, H.E., Srivastava, R.M., 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York. USA, 561p Journel, A.G., Huijbregts, C.H.J., 1978.
  7. Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press,
  8. London, UK. 600 p. Kerry, R., Oliver, M.A., 2004. Average variograms to guide soil sampling. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 5(4): 307-325.
  9. Kızılkaya, R., Aşkın, T., Bayraklı, B., Sağlam, M., 2004. Microbiological characteristics of soils contaminated with heavy metals. European Journal of Soil Biology 40(2): 95-102.
  10. Kızılkaya, R., Dengiz, O., Özyazıcı, M.A., Aşkın, T., Mikayilsoy, F., Shein, E., 2011. Spatial distribution of heavy metals status in Bafra plain soils in Turkey. Eurasian Soil Science 44(12): 1343-1351.
  11. Kloke, A., 1980. Orientierungsdaten für Tolerierbare Gesamtgehalte einiger Elemente in Kulturböden. Mitteilungen des VDLUFA 1: 9-11.
  12. Lindsay, W.L., Norvell, W.A., 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42(3): 421-428.
  13. Lo, C.P., Yeung, A.K.W., 2002. Concepts and techniques of Geographic Information Systems. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. USA. 532 p. Martinez, C.E., Motto, H.L., 2000. Solubility of lead, zinc and copper added to mineral soils. Environmental Pollution 107(1): 153-158.