Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Soil Science / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Spatial variability assessment of Nile alluvial soils using electrical resistivity technique

Sayfa
110–117
Yayın Tarihi
2019-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The method used opens the way to the development of semi-automatic soil mapping from electrical resistivity data.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Spatial information about soils generally results from local observations which are destructive and time consuming.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:GPS defined grid points of 40X40 m were installed in the experimental western farm (EWF) in the Faculty of Agriculture of Cairo University in Giza.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The method used opens the way to the development of semi-automatic soil mapping from electrical resistivity data.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Soil resistivity · Wenner profiling · soil moisture

Abstract

Spatial information about soils generally results from local observations which are destructive and time consuming. Geophysical techniques could help soil mapping since they are non-destructive and fast. Electrical resistivity is interesting for soil studies due to a wide range of values and as it depends on soil characteristics. This work aims to study soil spatial variability using electrical resistivity. GPS defined grid points of 40X40 m were installed in the experimental western farm (EWF) in the Faculty of Agriculture of Cairo University in Giza. Electrical resistivity was measured at 40 points using 4-electrodes Wenner array in a line perpendicular to the path direction. Soil resistivity data from 2-depths profiling mode was considered to produce two apparent resistivity maps and geostatistically tested. Soil resistivity taxa were sampled and analyzed for soil moisture, EC and bulk density. Krigged soil resistivity maps were produced for depths (i.e. 30 and 60 cm). Kriging and Semivariogram interpretation was conducted, and the spatial dependency of top and subsoil resistivity were moderate (48.4% and 68.6% respectively). Highly significant negative correlations were recorded in the topsoil between apparent or true resistivity and soil moisture, EC or bulk density. The obtained models were used to produce conjugated moisture and EC maps and geostatistically investigated. The spatial dependency of the top and subsoil moisture or salinity were moderate. Soil moisture and EC are the most significant factors for controlling soil electrical resistivity. The method used opens the way to the development of semi-automatic soil mapping from electrical resistivity data.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SWİLEAM, G. S., SHAHİN, R. R., NASR, H. M., ESSA, K. S. (2019). Spatial variability assessment of Nile alluvial soils using electrical resistivity technique. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 110–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/756568

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Abidin, M.H.Z., Ahmad, F., Wijeyesekera, D.C., Saad, R., Baharuddin, M.F.T., 2013. Soil resistivity measurements to predict moisture content and density in loose and dense soil. Applied Mechanics and Materials 353-356: 911–917.
  2. Al-Omran, A.M., Al-Wabel, M.I., El-Maghraby, S.E., Nadeem, M.E., Al-Sharani, S., 2013. Spatial variability for some properties of the wastewater irrigated soils. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 12(2): 167-175.
  3. Besson, A., Cousin, I., Bourennane, H., Nicoullaud, B., Pasquier, C., Richard, G., Dorigny, A., King, D., 2010. The spatial and temporal organization of soil water at the field scale as described by electrical resistivity measurements. European Journal of Soil Science 61(1): 120-132.
  4. Blake, G.R., Hartge, K.H., 1986. Bulk density. In: Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition,
  5. Klute, A., (Ed). American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 363-375.
  6. Burger, H.R., 1992. Exploration Geophysics of the Shallow Subsurface. Prentice Hall. New Jersey, USA. 489p. Bourennane, H., Hinschberger, F., Chartin, C., Salvador-Blanes, S., 2017. Spatial filtering of electrical resistivity and slope intensity: Enhancement of spatial estimates of a soil property. Journal of Applied Geophysics 138: 210-219.
  7. Brillante, L., Bois, B., Lévêque, J., Mathieu, O., 2016. Variations in soil-water use by grapevine according to plant water status and soil physical-chemical characteristics—A 3D spatio-temporal analysis, European Journal of Agronomy 77: 122-135.
  8. Cambardella, C.A. Moorman, T.B., Novak, J.M., Parkin, T.B., Karlen, D.L., Turco, R.F., Konopka, A.E., 1994. Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society America Journal 58(5): 1501–1511.
  9. Corwin, D.L., Lesch, S.M., Oster, J.D., Kaffka, S.R., 2006. Monitoring management-induced spatio–temporal changes in soil quality through soil sampling directed by apparent electrical conductivity. Geoderma 131: 369–387.
  10. Dabas, M., Tabbagh, A., Boisgontier, D., 2001. Multi-depth continuous electrical profiling (MuCep) for characterization of in-field variability. Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Precision Agriculture. Grenier, G., Blackmore, S. (Eds.), pp. 361–366, 18–21 June 2001
  11. Montpellier, France, ESRI, 2011. ArcGIS Desktop Software: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute. Gardner, W.H., 1986. Water Content. In: Methods of Soil A