KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Environmental Research and Technology / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Application of an airlift internal circulation membrane bioreactor for the treatment of textile wastewater

Abdulkadir ÇAĞLAK
Nouha BAKARAKİ TURAN
Hanife ERKAN
Güleda Önkal ENGİN
Sayfa
24–32
Yayın Tarihi
2022-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Finally, the capillary suction time measurement highlighted a good dewatering capacity of the sludge with a low membrane fouling tendency at the end of the operating period.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A large amount of water is used in the textile industry during the finishing and dyeing processes leading to the production of what is known as textile wastewaters.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Experimental results demonstrated that high removal efficiencies of COD, NH3-N, and reactive red up to 99.70%, 97.83%, and 97.23%, respectively, can be achieved using the AIC-MBR system.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, the capillary suction time measurement highlighted a good dewatering capacity of the sludge with a low membrane fouling tendency at the end of the operating period.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Airlift internal circulation membrane bioreactor · color · reactive red

Abstract

A large amount of water is used in the textile industry during the finishing and dyeing processes leading to the production of what is known as textile wastewaters. Textile wastewater is highly rich in COD and color and is characterized by relatively low biodegradability. This study aimed to investigate the treatability of reactive red dye-rich textile wastewater with the application of an airlift internal circulation membrane bioreactor (AIC-MBR). Experimental results demonstrated that high removal efficiencies of COD, NH3-N, and reactive red up to 99.70%, 97.83%, and 97.23%, respectively, can be achieved using the AIC-MBR system. Besides, EPS and SMP analyses reflected an SMP polysaccharide (PS) and protein (PN) membrane rejection that reached 88% and 72.6%, respectively. Finally, the capillary suction time measurement highlighted a good dewatering capacity of the sludge with a low membrane fouling tendency at the end of the operating period.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇAĞLAK, A., TURAN, N. B., ERKAN, H., ENGİN, G. Ö. (2022). Application of an airlift internal circulation membrane bioreactor for the treatment of textile wastewater. Environmental Research and Technology, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 24–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/754185

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (27)

  1. V. Jegatheesan, B.K. Pramanik, J. Chen, D. Navaratna, C.-Y. Chang, L. Shu, Bioresource technology 204 (2016) 202
  2. K.M. Shah, Handbook of synthetic dyes and pigments, Multi-tech Publishing Company, 1998
  3. C.R. Holkar, A.J. Jadhav, D.V. Pinjari, N.M. Mahamuni, A.B. Pandit, Journal of environmental management 182 (2016) 351
  4. M.M. Hassan, C.M. Carr, Chemosphere 209 (2018) 201
  5. G. Walker, L. Weatherley, Separation Science and Technology 35 (2000) 1329
  6. S.H. Lin, M.L. Chen, Water research 31 (1997) 868
  7. J. Naumczyk, L. Szpyrkowicz, F. Zilio-Grandi, Water Science and Technology 34 (1996) 17
  8. S. Andleeb, N. Atiq, M.I. Ali, R. Razi-ul-Hussnain, M. Shafique, B. Ahmad, P.B. Ghumro, M. Hussain, A. Hameed, S. Ahmad, Int. J. Agric. Biol 12 (2010) 256
  9. H.S. Erkan, N.B. Turan, G.O. Engin, Fouling control in MBR in a sustainable perspective, Elsevier. 2020, pp. 21
  10. J. Merchuk, A. Contreras, F. Garcia, E. Molina, Chemical Engineering Science 53 (1998) 709
  11. F. Yang, A. Bick, S. Shandalov, A. Brenner, G. Oron, Journal of Membrane Science 334 (2009) 83
  12. R. Liu, X. Huang, C. Wang, L. Chen, Y. Qian, Process Biochemistry 36 (2000) 249
  13. A. Sofia, W. Ng, S. Ong, Desalination 160 (2004) 67
  14. F. Yang, A. Bick, S. Shandalov, G. Oron, Water science and technology 54 (2006) 155
  15. A. Eaton, ΣΧΟΛΗ, ΤΜΗΜΑ ΧΗΜΙΚΩΝ ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΩΝ (2005)
  16. T. Li, R. Bai, J. Liu, Journal of biotechnology 135 (2008) 52
  17. O. Lorwy, N. Rosenbrough, A. Farr, T. Randall, J. biol. Chem 193 (1951) 265
  18. M. Dubois, K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.t. Rebers, F. Smith, Analytical chemistry 28 (1956) 350
  19. F. Meng, S.-R. Chae, A. Drews, M. Kraume, H.-S. Shin, F. Yang, Water research 43 (2009) 1489
  20. P. Bérubé, Sustainability Science and Engineering 2 (2010) 255
  21. S. Judd, Trends in biotechnology 26 (2008) 109
  22. F. Meng, H. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Zhang, F. Yang, Journal of Membrane Science 262 (2005) 107
  23. Y. Fan, G. Li, L. Wu, W. Yang, C. Dong, H. Xu, W. Fan, Process Biochemistry 41 (2006) 1364
  24. B.A. Poursat, R.J. van Spanning, P. de Voogt, J.R. Parsons, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 49 (2019) 2220
  25. F. Yang, Y. Wang, A. Bick, J. Gilron, A. Brenner, L. Gillerman, M. Herzberg, G. Oron, Desalination 284 (2012) 261
  26. Q. Meng, F. Yang, L. Liu, F. Meng, Journal of Environmental Sciences 20 (2008) 933
  27. D. Yaseen, M. Scholz, International journal of environmental science and technology 16 (2019) 1193. [