Dergiler / ELT Research Journal / 2014 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Turkish ELT students' willingness to communicate in English

Sayfa
91–109
Yayın Tarihi
2014-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Besides, it was considered that students' motivation levels, too, partly, had an effect on their WTC in English.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper aims to present the willingness to communicate (WTC) in English of the English Language Teaching Department (ELT) students of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University inside and outside the class.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To this end, quantitative data were gathered from 274 students studying at the department.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Besides, it was considered that students' motivation levels, too, partly, had an effect on their WTC in English.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Willingness to communicate · motivation · communication apprehension

Abstract

This paper aims to present the willingness to communicate (WTC) in English of the English Language Teaching Department (ELT) students of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University inside and outside the class. Additionally, the relationships among students’ willingness to communicate in English, their linguistic self-confidence, motivation, attitudes toward international community, and personality will be presented. To this end, quantitative data were gathered from 274 students studying at the department. For the qualitative aspect of the study, the researcher selected 26 students among 274 students who completed the questionnaire. The research study utilized a mixed approach, and the instruments employed in this study included a questionnaire, classroom observations, and interviews. Students’ overall willingness to communicate in English was found to be between moderate and high, and their motivational intensity to be very high both inside and outside. Most of the students seemed to have positive attitudes toward the English language and the cultures of the English speaking countries. Additionally, it was found that self-confidence, attitude toward international community, and motivation showed significant correlations with the WTC in English. There were also significant correlations among self-confidence and learners’ attitude and self-confidence and motivation. It was also found that the most significant predictor on students’ in-class WTC level was self-confidence and that it provided a direct change on their WTC. Besides, it was considered that students' motivation levels, too, partly, had an effect on their WTC in English.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Şener, S. (2014). Turkish ELT students' willingness to communicate in English. ELT Research Journal, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 91–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/754058

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Atay, D., & Kurt, G. (2009). Turkish EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in English. Paper presented at The First International Congress of Educational research: Trends and issues of educational research. Çanakkale: Educational Research Association, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Ministry of National Education. Bektaş, Ç. Y. (2005). Turkish collage students’ willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Ohio State University. Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39, 468-479.
  2. Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34, 480– 493. Gardener, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold. Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G. H., & Asadpour, S. F. (2012). Willingness to communicate in English among Iranian non-English major university students. Journal of language and Social Psychology, 31(2), 197-211.
  3. Jung, M. (2011). Korean EFL university students’ willingness to communicate in English. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University. Kang, S.J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33, 277–292.
  4. Kim, H. J. (2004). The relationship among perceived competence, actual competence and language anxiety: Biases in self-ratings of second language proficiency. Modern English Education, 5, 68-85.
  5. Krashen, S. (1982). Principle and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  6. Ligtbrown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass., & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House. MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A casual analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11, 135-142.
  8. MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 589-607.
  9. MacIntyre, P., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and social Psychology, 15, 3