KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

An Empirical Perspective on the Relationship Between Innovation Performance and Sustainable Development

Sema YİĞİT
Sayfa
47–57
Yayın Tarihi
2021-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the causality test results, it was determined that there are both short and long-run relationships between the three dimensions of innovation and sustainable development.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In 2015, almost all member states of the United Nations adopted seventeen Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which provide specific objectives and timelines to promote inclusive prosperity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Innovation itself is one of the SDGs (Goal 9) and also a means for achieving the others.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the causality test results, it was determined that there are both short and long-run relationships between the three dimensions of innovation and sustainable development.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Innovation performance · Sustainable development · Three pillars of sustainable development

Abstract

In 2015, almost all member states of the United Nations adopted seventeen Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which provide specific objectives and timelines to promote inclusive prosperity. Innovation is crucial for achieving sustainable development. Innovation itself is one of the SDGs (Goal 9) and also a means for achieving the others. It is aimed to reveal the multidimensional relationship of innovation with the pillars of sustainable development in this study. The dataset of the study consists of 35 OECD member countries and statistics of these countries between 2007-2019 years. Global innovation scores of countries were used for innovation. Human Development Index was used for the social dimension, CO2 emission values were used for the environmental dimension and GDP per capita was used for the economic dimension. The balanced panel was resolved through Eviews and STATA software packages programs. According to the results of the analysis, innovation has a positive and significant relationship with the social and economic pillars of sustainable development. It also has a significant but negative relationship with CO2 emission, which negative relationship is a positive situation for the environment. Therefore, the main result of the study is innovation has a positive effect on sustainable development. According to the causality test results, it was determined that there are both short and long-run relationships between the three dimensions of innovation and sustainable development.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YİĞİT, S. (2021). An Empirical Perspective on the Relationship Between Innovation Performance and Sustainable Development. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 47–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/751861

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Acheampong, A. O. (2018).
  2. Economic Growth, CO2 Emissions and Energy Consumption: What Causes What and Where? Energy Economics, 74, 677-692.
  3. Avila-Lopez, L. A., Lyu, C., & Lopez-Leyva, S. (2019). Innovation and Growth: Evidence from Latin American Countries. Journal of Applied Economics, 22(1), 287-303.
  4. Batie, S. S., Sedjo, R. A., & Fedkiw, J. (2008). Sustainability: From Natural Resource Sufficiency to Ecosystem Functional Integrity. R. A. Sedjo inside, Perspectives on Sustainable Resources in America (s. 11-21). Washington: RFF Press Book. Breitung, J. (2000). The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, 15,161-177.
  5. Constantinescu, A., & Frone, S. (2014). The Role of Technological Innovation in Sustainable Economic Development. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 4(1.1),1-13.
  6. Costa, L., Rybski, D., & Kropp, J. P. (2011). A Human Development Framework for CO2 Reductions. PLoS ONE, 6(12), 1-9.
  7. Çınar, S. (2011). Income and CO2 Emissions: Panel Unit Root and Cointegration Tests. Uludağ Journal of Economy and Society, 30(2),71-83.
  8. Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., & Salman, M. (2019). The Effects of Economic Growth and Innovation on CO2 Emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(15),15028-15038.
  9. Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
  10. Dutta, S., Reynoso, R. E., Garanasvili, A., Saxena, K., Lanvin, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S.,. Guadagno, F. (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation. S. Dutta, B. Lanvin, & S. Wunsch-Vincent inside, Global Innovation Indeks 2018 (s. 3-54). Retrieved from https:// www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdf. Ejemeyovwi, J. O., Osabuohien, E. S., Johnson, O. D., & Bowale, E. I. (2019).
  11. Internet Usage, Innovation and Human Development Nexus in Africa: The Case of ECOWAS. Journal of Economic Structures, 8(1),1-16.
  12. Fan, H., & Hossain, M. I. (2018).
  13. Technological Innovation, Trade Openness, CO2 Emission and Economic Growth: Comparative Analysis between China and India. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(6),240-257.
  14. Garren, S. J., & Brinkmann, R. (2018).
  15. Sustainability Definitions, Historical Context, and Frameworks. R. Brinkmann, & S. J. Garren inside, The Palgrave Handbook of Sustainability Case Studies and Practical Solutions (s. 1-18). Cham: Palgra