Dergiler / Black Sea Journal of Health Science / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

A macroanatomic, morphometric and comparative investigation on skeletal system of the geese growing in Kars region II; Skeleton appendiculare

Sayfa
6–16
Yayın Tarihi
2021-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, in this study, thought that obtained findings will contribute in scientific research, evaluations of sexualdimorphism, zooarchaeological studies and operations on poultry animals.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to comparatively, morphometrically and macroanatomically investigate skeleton appendiculare.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Atotal of 24 goose cadavers were used.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, in this study, thought that obtained findings will contribute in scientific research, evaluations of sexualdimorphism, zooarchaeological studies and operations on poultry animals.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anatomy · Goose · Kars

Abstract

The aim of this study was to comparatively, morphometrically and macroanatomically investigate skeleton appendiculare. Atotal of 24 goose cadavers were used. Scapula length was 107.31 ± 1.05 mm in female geese; it was 116.63 ± 0.65 mm in male geese.While the length of the os coracoideum was 78.5 ± 0.6 mm in female geese; it was detected as 87 ± 0.8 mm in male geese. The claviculalength was 66.90 ± 0.71 mm in female geese and it was 73.39 ± 0.59 mm in male geese and it was determined that both claviculashaped furcula with a distinct curvature. While the length of the humerus in female geese was 175.02 ± 1.59 mm; it was measured as191.28 ± 1.44 mm in male ones. While the mean ulna height was 162.60 ± 1.26 mm in female geese; it was determined as 178.84 ± 0.83mm in male geese. The mean radius length was measured as 154.20 ± 1.63 mm in female geese, it was 169.75 ± 1.31 mm in male geese.It was detected that os carpi radiale was in a triangular shape, os carpi ulnare was in the form of a pipe. It was determined that theheight of carpometacarpus was 94.57 ± 0.75 mm in female geese; 100.95 ± 1.03 mm was in male geese. Pelvis length was measured as154.27 ± 1.81 mm in female geese; it was 169.91 ± 1.68 mm in male geese. While femur length was detected as 86.85 ± 0.98 mm infemale geese; it was 93.87 ± 1.12 mm in male geese. While tibiotarsus length was 160.94 ± 1.88 mm in female geese; it was 174.20 ±1.28 mm in male ones. While the tarsometatarsus length was 93.15 ± 1.19 mm in female geese; it was measured as 101.64 ± 0.88 mmin male geese. As a result, in this study, thought that obtained findings will contribute in scientific research, evaluations of sexualdimorphism, zooarchaeological studies and operations on poultry animals.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DOĞAN, G. K., TAKCI, İ. (2021). A macroanatomic, morphometric and comparative investigation on skeletal system of the geese growing in Kars region II; Skeleton appendiculare. Black Sea Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 6–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/745325

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Allison R, Tumarkin-Deratzian, David RV, Peter D. 2006. Bone surface texture as an ontogenetic indicator in long bones of the Canada goose Branta canadensis (Anseriformes: Anatidae). Zool J Linnean Soc, 148: 133-168. DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00232.x. Aslan C. 2013.
  2. Kaz besleme ve yetiştiriciliği, Genişletilmiş 2. baskı, Medipres Matbaacılık Yayıncılık Lt. Şti, Malatya, Turkey. Atalar Ö, Kürtül İ, Özdemir D. 2007. Morphological and morphometric approach to the bones of the wings in the Long-Legged Buzzard (Buteo Rufinus). FÜ Sağ Bil Derg, 21: 163-166.
  3. Başoğul M, Beşoluk K. 2016. Kaya kekliği (Alectoris graeca) ve sülünlerde (Phasianus colchicus) bacak kemikleri (Ossa membri pelvini) üzerinde karşılaştırmalı makro anatomik araştırmalar. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 1: 13-22.
  4. Charuta A, Bartyzel BJ, Karbowicz M, Kobryń H. 2005. Morphology and morphometry of the antebrachial skeleton and bones of hand of the domestic Pekin duck. Vet Med Zoot, 51: 26-30.
  5. Çevik Demirkan A, Kürtül İ, Hazıroğlu RM. 2006. Gross morphological features of the lung and air sac in the Japanese quail. J Vet Med Sci, 68: 909-913. Çevik Demirkan A. 2002. Ördekte iskelet sistemi. AÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, PhD. Thesis, Ankara. Demirsoy A. 1995. Yaşamın temel kuralları. omurgalılar/amniyota (sürüngenler, kuşlar ve memeliler). Vol. 3, Bölüm 2, Meteksan Yayınevi,
  6. Ankara, Turkey. Dursun N. 2007. Evcil kuşların anatomisi. Medisan yayınevi, 11. Baskı,
  7. Ankara,
  8. Turkey. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. 1987. Textbook of veterinary anatomy. Philadelphia, USA. Gültekin M.1966. Evcil memeli ve kanatlıların karşılaştırmalı osteologia’sı. Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, Turkey. Gültekin M.1957. Yerli tavuk ve horoz iskeleti ile yerli hindi iskeleti arasındaki sabit makro-anatomik ayrımlar üzerinde incelemeler. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 4: 6-14. Hogg DA. 1984a. The development of pneumatisation in the postcranial skeleton of the domestic fowl. J Anat, 139: 105-113. Hogg DA. 1984b. The distribution of pneumatisation in the skeleton of the adult domestic fowl. J Anat, 138: 617-629.
  9. Kılıç E, Yayla S, Ermutlu CŞ, Aydın U. 2018. Köpek yavrularında diafizer femur kırığının sağaltımı için kaz radius’u kullanımı. V. International Multidisciplinary Congress of Eurasia, Barcelona-Spain, 24-26
  10. July. King AS, McLelland J. 1984. Birds their structure and function. Bailliere Tindal, London, UK. King AS, McLelland J. 1975. Outlines of avian anatomy. Bailliere Tindal, London, UK. King AS. 1957. The aerated bones of