FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN

Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çal man namac ;haz rlanan II. s n f kavitelere uygulanan posterior restoratif materyallerin k r lma dayan kl l klar n nde8erlendirilmesidir

📊

Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu çal man namac ;haz rlanan II. s n f kavitelere uygulanan posterior restoratif materyallerin k r lma dayan kl l klar n nde8erlendirilmesidir

💡

Sonuç & Katkı:Bu çal man namac ;haz rlanan II. s n f kavitelere uygulanan posterior restoratif materyallerin k r lma dayan kl l klar n nde8erlendirilmesidir

🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi

📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem

⚙️Değişkenler:Fracture resistance · posterior composite · tunnel restoration

Özet

Bu çal man namac ;haz rlanan II. s n f kavitelere uygulanan posterior restoratif materyallerin k r lma dayan kl l klar n nde8erlendirilmesidir

Abstract

-

Anahtar kelimeler

Fracture resistance posterior composite tunnel restoration conventional class II cavity modified class II cavity (Saucer-shaped cavity)

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERCAN, Y. D. D. E., ERDEMiR, D. D. A., ZORBA, Y. D. D. Y. O., DALLI, D. M. (2007). FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 2007 - Sayı: 2, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/736343

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Yeni Sekmede Aç ↗

↗Yeni Sekme

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

Kitty MY, Stephen HY. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. JADA 1997; 128: 1088-96.
Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Marginal and flexural integrity of three classes of luting cement, with early finishing and water storage. Dent Mater 2004;20:3–11.
Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Quagliatto PS, Soares CJ. The influence of the cavity preparation design on marginal accuracy of laboratory-processed resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2007,Bas mda Kahler B, Kotousov A, Borkowski K. On fracture resistance of restored teeth. Key Engineering Materials Vol. 2005;245-51.
Y lmaz EÖ, Ulusoy N. Farkl yöntemlerle haz rlanan s n f mikros z nt s n n de8erlendirilmesi. A.Ü. Di Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32;171-80. 6- Nalçac A, Ulusoy N. Farkl polimerizasyon zamanlar n n rezinlerin yüzey sertli8i üzerine etkileri. A.Ü. Di Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32; 79-84,
Manhart W, Chen HY, Hickel R. The suitable of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132: 639-45.
Altun C, Kabalay U, Güven G, Ba ak F, Akbulut E, pediatrik di yöntemlerinin restoratif materyalin polimerizasyon büzülmesi üzerine etkileri. Gülhane T p Derg 2005; 47: 127-31. Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications. Int Dent J 1991;41:25–32. Ritter AV. Posterior resin-based composite restorations: clinical recommendations for optimal success. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13:88–99.
Cho L, Song H, Koak J, Heo S. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: effect of variations in preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:388– 95. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent 1994;22:147–53.
Koran P, Kürschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998;10: 17- 22. Pyk N, Méjare I, Tunnel restorations in general practice. Influence of some clinical variables on the success rate, Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57: 195– 200. Almqusit TC, Cowan RD, Lambert RL. Conservative amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:524-8.
Nordbo H, Leirskar J, van der Fehr FR. Saucer- shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: Observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 1998;29:5-11.
Ellis SG, McCord JF, Burke F