Dergiler / Al Farabi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND ENERGY SECTORS in TURKEY: AN INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL

Sayfa
289–305
Yayın Tarihi
2017-11-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These results ensure useful information for policy makers to stimulate growth via more appropriate investments in the economy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Energy sector plays a fundamental part (either as a cause or the as a facilitator) in the economic growth process.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As known, agricultural sector also plays a strategic role in the process of economic development of a country.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These results ensure useful information for policy makers to stimulate growth via more appropriate investments in the economy.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Energy use in agriculture and food sectors · Input–output analysis · Turkey

Özet

Energy sector plays a fundamental part (either as a cause or the as a facilitator) in the economic growth process. As known, agricultural sector also plays a strategic role in the process of economic development of a country. Agriculture and energy sector are considered to be important drivers of the economy due to their strong inter-industrial linkages. The purpose of this study is to analyse the structural interdependency of the agriculture, food and energy sectors in Turkey. In this study, it has been discussed whether agriculture, energy and food manufacturing industries can be considered as the drivers of the Turkish economy. For this purpose, the input-output tables constructed by the TurkStat national accounts in 2012 has been employed and several multipliers have been calculated by using input-output tables. According to the multipliers, employment creation capacity of agriculture, energy and food manufacturing sector is relatively weak. However, their income creation impact is remarkably high. Among the others, agriculture is the most income creative sector in case of final demand increase in the economy. Similarly, energy sector has key role in the economy, since it's both direct and indirect income generating effect is quite high. These results ensure useful information for policy makers to stimulate growth via more appropriate investments in the economy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Karkacıer, O., Bölük, G. (2017). THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND ENERGY SECTORS in TURKEY: AN INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL. Al Farabi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 289–305. https://ajindex.com/articles/732889

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Atan S. (2011). Türkiye'deki Sektörel Bağlantı Yapısının Girdi-Çıktı Yaklaşımı ile İncelenmesi: Yurtiçi Üretim ve İthal Ara Girdi Araştırması. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 22(8): 59-78.
  2. Atan S. and Aslanturk Y. (2012). Tourism and economic growth nexus: an input-output analysis in Turkey.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 62: 952 – 956. Aydın S. (2001), Türk İmalat Sanayinin Üretim Yapısı (1973-1990):
  3. Girdi-Çıktı Analizi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, https://polen.itu.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11527/11169/935.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, (Access date 04/11/2017).
  4. Aydoğuş, O. (2010).Girdi Çıktı Modellerine Giriş. Gazi Kitapevi. Ankara.
  5. Çalışkan E.T. and Aydogus O. (2011).Türkiye Ekonomisinde Endüstriyel Büyümenin Kaynakları:Girdi-ÇıktıModeli İle Ampirik Bir Analiz (1985-2002).Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(4): 499-510.
  6. Çondur F. and Evlimlioğlu U. (2007).Türkiye'de Madencilik Sektörünün Girdi-Çıktı Analizi Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17: 25-41.
  7. Coon R.C., Leistritz F.L., Hertsgaard T.A., and Leholm A.G., (1985). The North Dakota Input-Output Model: A Tool for Analyzing Economic Linkages, North Dakota State University, Agricultural Economics Report, No:187, http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23304/files/aer187.pdf, (Access date 07/11/2017).
  8. Dalgaard T., Halberg N., and Porter J.R. (2001).A Model for Fossil Energy Use in Danish Agriculture Used to Compare Organicand Conventional Farming.AgricultureEcosystems&Environment, 87: 51-65.
  9. D'Hernoncourt J., Cordier M., and Hadley D. (2011). Input-Output Multipliers Specification Sheet and Supporting Material, Science Policy Integration for Coastal Systems Assessment (SPICOSA), Project No:036992, http://www.coastal-saf.eu/output-step/pdf/Specification %20sheet% 20I_O _final. pdf, (Access date15/04/2017).
  10. Deloitte. (2016).
  11. Turkish Energy Market Outlook, Achievement, Overview and Opportunities, http://dektmk.org.tr/upresimler/turkish-energy-market-outlook.pdf, (Access date 5/04/2017).
  12. Goktolga Z.G. and Özkan M.(2011). 1998-2002 Yılları Türkiye Taşımacılık Sektörü Kilit Sektörlerinin Girdi-Çıktı Analizi.Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, II: 65-8.
  13. Gul Z.B. (2017). Construction Industry in Turkey:An Input-Output Analysis Using the World Input-Output Database (WIOD) for the 2002-2011 Periods. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1): 157-174.
  14. Haeussler, F.F., and Paul R.S. (1987).Introductory Mathematical Analysis for Business Economics and the Life an