Dergiler / Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of the Energy (Biogas) Derivation from Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste Products

Sayfa
332–340
Yayın Tarihi
2019-05-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Hence, this study has shown that biogas can be produced from different food waste, but some food waste has a higher biogas energy potential than other food waste

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was carried out to determine the derivative energy (biogas) from different food waste substrates.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A fixed mass (5kg) of different food substrates and distilled water (5kg) were anaerobically digested in the ratio of 1:1, and their derivable energy were measured respectively for raw and purified biogas.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Hence, this study has shown that biogas can be produced from different food waste, but some food waste has a higher biogas energy potential than other food waste
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Biogas · Energy · Anaerobic digestion

Özet

This study was carried out to determine the derivative energy (biogas) from different food waste substrates. A fixed mass (5kg) of different food substrates and distilled water (5kg) were anaerobically digested in the ratio of 1:1, and their derivable energy were measured respectively for raw and purified biogas. Food substrates used for the process includes Beans, Rice, Yam, Fufu, Ripe Plantain, Garri, Corn, Unripe Plantain, Sweet Potatoes, Ripe Banana, Pineapple and Water Melon, but Garri yielded the highest raw biogas of 140g and highest purified biogas of 110g. This was followed by Fufu and Yam which yielded raw biogas of 120g and purified biogas of 90g. Among the aforementioned substrates digested, Sweet potatoes had the lowest raw biogas yield of 70g with the lowest purified biogas yield of 50g. It was observed that pH of feedstocks before digestion varied between 6.8 and 7.1, whereas, pH of the same feedstocks after digestion varied between 5.1 and 6.3, indicating that the by-product can be useful as a valuable product for compost manure after biogas recovery. Hence, this study has shown that biogas can be produced from different food waste, but some food waste has a higher biogas energy potential than other food waste

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the derivative energy (biogas) from different food waste substrates. A fixed mass (5kg) of different food substrates and distilled water (5kg) were anaerobically digested in the ratio of 1:1, and their derivable energy were measured respectively for raw and purified biogas. Food substrates used for the process includes Beans, Rice, Yam, Fufu, Ripe Plantain, Garri, Corn, Unripe Plantain, Sweet Potatoes, Ripe Banana, Pineapple and Water Melon, but Garri yielded the highest raw biogas of 140g and highest purified biogas of 110g. This was followed by Fufu and Yam which yielded raw biogas of 120g and purified biogas of 90g. Among the aforementioned substrates digested, Sweet potatoes had the lowest raw biogas yield of 70g with the lowest purified biogas yield of 50g. It was observed that pH of feedstocks before digestion varied between 6.8 and 7.2, whereas, pH of the same feedstocks after digestion varied between 7.4 and 7.7, indicating that the by-product can be useful as a valuable product for compost manure after biogas recovery. Hence, this study has shown that biogas can be produced from different food waste, but some food waste has a higher biogas energy potential than other food waste.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

IKPE, A., IMONİTİE, D. İ., NDON, A. E. (2019). Investigation of the Energy (Biogas) Derivation from Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste Products. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 332–340. https://ajindex.com/articles/730642

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. A. Ikpe, and I. Owunna, “Review of Municipal Solid Waste Management Technologies and Its Practices In China And Germany” International Journal of Technology Enhancements and Emerging Engineering Research Vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1-7, 2016.[2] EC Ifeanyi, “Potential Impact of Climate Change on Solid Waste Management in Nigeria”, [online] available from [29 March 2017].[3] O. Aluko, M. Sridhar and P. Oluwande, “Characterization of leachates from a municipal solid waste landfill site in Ibadan, Nigeria,” Chartered Institute of Environmental Health 2(1), 2003.[4] World Population Review, “Nigeria Population 2014”, [online] available from [26 December 2017].[5] I. Adewumi, M. Ogedengbe, J. Adepetu, and Y. Fabiyi, “Planning Organic Fertilizer Industries for Municipal Solid Waste Management”, Journal of Applied Sciences Research Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 285-291, 2005.[6] C. Ogwueleka, “Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Nigeria”, Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 173-180, 2009.[7] M. Dauda and OO Osita, Solid waste management and re-use in Maiduguri, Nigeria. 29th WEDC International Conference: Towards the Millennium Development Goals, 2003.[8] PO Ebunilo, J Okovido and AE Ikpe, “Anaerobic Digestion of Food Substrates for Biogas Production”, Nigerian Research Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 236-245, 2018.[9] AB Onakoya, AO Onakoya, OA Jimi-Salami and B Odedairo, “Energy Consumption and Nigerian Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis”, European Scientific Journal, Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1857-7881, 2013.[10] A. Ogundipe and A Apata, “Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth in Nigeria”, Journal of Business Management and Applied Economics Vol. 2, no. 4, 2013.[11] AE Akinlo, “Electricity Consumption and Economic growth in Nigeria: Evidence from Cointegration and Co-feature Analysis”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 681-693, 2009.[12] World Bank, “Country Partnership Strategy for the Federal Republic of Nigeria (2005-2009)”, Report No. 32412 –NG, 2005.[13] C Ukpabi, O Ndukwe, O Okoro, I John and P Eti, “The Production of Biogas Using Cow Dung and Food Waste”, International Journal of Materials and Chemistry, Vol. 7, no. (2), pp. 21-24, 2017.[14] RB Nallamothu, A Teferra and BV Apparao, “Biogas Purification, Compression and Bottling. Global Journal of Engineering”, Design and Technology Vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 34-38, 2013.[15] K. Faisal, HB Abdullah, NH Muham