Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Academic Self Efficacy and Dispositional Hope as Predictors of Academic Procrastination: The Mediating Effect of Academic Intrinsic Motivation

Sayfa
296–314
Yayın Tarihi
2022-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings were discussed, and some recommendations were made.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims at determining the mediating effect of academic intrinsic motivation on the relationship between both students’ academic self-efficacy and dispositional hope levels to their academic procrastination habits.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The data were collected from a sample of 252 college students, 69 males (27.4%) and 183 females (72.6%), aged between 18 and 33 (X = 20.55; Sd =1.52) studying at a state university located in the Central Black Sea region of Turkey using a correlational survey model.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings were discussed, and some recommendations were made.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Academic self-efficacy · academic intrinsic motivation · academic procrastination

Abstract

This study aims at determining the mediating effect of academic intrinsic motivation on the relationship between both students’ academic self-efficacy and dispositional hope levels to their academic procrastination habits. The data were collected from a sample of 252 college students, 69 males (27.4%) and 183 females (72.6%), aged between 18 and 33 (X = 20.55; Sd =1.52) studying at a state university located in the Central Black Sea region of Turkey using a correlational survey model. Academic Self Efficacy Scale, Dispositional Hope Scale, Academic Intrinsic Motivation Scale, and Aitken Academic Procrastination Scale were used as data collection tools. Descriptive statistics of the socio-demographic characteristics were presented, and Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to determine the correlations between variables by using SPSS statistical package programme. The hypothesis measurement model and the mediating effect were examined by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) by using LISREL statistical software. The obtained results showed that significant (low and moderate) relationships exist between variables and the model tested in the study yielded acceptable and good fit index values. A complete mediating effect of academic intrinsic motivation on the relationship between both academic self-efficacy and dispositional hope with academic procrastination was determined. The findings were discussed, and some recommendations were made.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOZGÜN, K., BAYTEMİR, K. (2022). Academic Self Efficacy and Dispositional Hope as Predictors of Academic Procrastination: The Mediating Effect of Academic Intrinsic Motivation. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 296–314. https://ajindex.com/articles/720584

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Aitken, M. E. (1982). A personality profile of the college student procrastinator. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh. Akbay, S., & Gizir, C. (2010). Academic procrastination among university students according to gender: the role of academic motivation, academic self-efficacy and academic attributional style. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 6(1), 60-78.
  2. Akpur, U. (2017). Predictive and explanatory relationship model between procrastination, motivation, anxiety and academic achievement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(69), 221-21.
  3. Alemdağ, C., Erman, Ö., & Yılmaz, A. K. (2014). Preservice physical education teachers’ academic motivation and academic self-efficacy. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 25(1), 23-35.
  4. Alexander, E. S., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). Academic procrastination and the role of hope as a coping strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(7), 1301-1310.
  5. Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  6. Balkıs, M. (2006). The relationships between student teachers’ procrastination behaviors, thinking and decision making styles. (Doctoral dissertation). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
  7. Balkıs, M., & Duru, E. (2009). Prevalence of academic procrastination behavior among pre-service teachers, and its relationship with demographics and individual preferences. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 5(1), 18-32.
  8. Balkıs, M., Duru, E., Buluş, M., & Duru, S. (2006). An investigation of the academic procrastination among university students in related to various variables. Ege Journal of Education, 7(2), 57-73.
  9. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
  10. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. Beck,