KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6

Investigation of the Effects of Pre-Service Teachers' Socio-Economic Statuses and Personality Traits on Their Motivations

Gözde YÜCE
Funda EKİCİ
Hüseyin AKKUŞ
Basri ATASOY
Sayfa
312–334
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings of the study are likely to provide useful information about the effect of upbringing environments of pre-service teachers, which shape their personality traits and personalities, on their motivations.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Although self-regulated learning (SRL) in education is more often associated with student learning, recently it has been emphasized that teachers should be self-regulated individuals, as well.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study enrolled 712 pre-service teachers studying at various departments of the Faculty of Education in a state university in Ankara, Türkiye.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings of the study are likely to provide useful information about the effect of upbringing environments of pre-service teachers, which shape their personality traits and personalities, on their motivations.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Self-regulated learning · motivation · socio-economic status

Abstract

Although self-regulated learning (SRL) in education is more often associated with student learning, recently it has been emphasized that teachers should be self-regulated individuals, as well. In this study focusing on motivation, one of the sub-dimensions of SRL, predictive power of socio-economic statuses and personality traits of pre-service teachers on their motivations was determined with hierarchical regression analysis. This study was conducted with survey model, which is one of the quantitative research methods. The study enrolled 712 pre-service teachers studying at various departments of the Faculty of Education in a state university in Ankara, Türkiye. The Big Five Inventory, was used to determine the personality traits of pre-service teachers, while the Socio-economic Status Form was used to determine their socio-economic status. The General Self-Efficacy Scale, 2x2 Achievement Goal Orientations Scale, Success/Failure Attributions Scale, and Scientific Epistemological Beliefs Survey were used to determine the motivation of pre-service teachers. The results of hierarchical regression analysis, which was conducted with the data obtained in the study, showed low-level significant effects of socio-economic status on some sub-dimensions of motivation. However, when personality traits were included in the analysis, it was found out that they have higher level significant effects on all sub-dimensions of motivation. In particular, the findings showed that motivation had a significant effect on self-efficacy and goal orientation sub-dimensions. The findings of the study are likely to provide useful information about the effect of upbringing environments of pre-service teachers, which shape their personality traits and personalities, on their motivations.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YÜCE, G., EKİCİ, F., AKKUŞ, H., ATASOY, B. (2022). Investigation of the Effects of Pre-Service Teachers' Socio-Economic Statuses and Personality Traits on Their Motivations. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6, 312–334. https://ajindex.com/articles/720508

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Adal, A. A., & Yavuz, İ. (2017). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin matematik öz yeterlik algıları ile matematik kaygı düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Uluslararası Alan Eğitimi Dergisi, 3(1), 20-41.
  2. Akdi, Y. (2011). Matematiksel istatistiğe giriş. Ankara:
  3. Gazi Kitabevi.
  4. Akın, A. (2006). 2X2 Başarı Yönelimleri Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 1-13.
  5. Alkan, N. (2007), “Beş Faktör Kişilik Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”. Ankara:
  6. Yayınlanmamış Araştırma. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structure, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
  7. Anderman, E. M., Austin, C. C., & Johnson, D. M. (2002). The development of goal orientation. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 197–220). San Diego: Academic Press.
  8. Artelt, C., Baumert, J., Julius-McElvaney, N., & Peschar, J. (2003). Learners for life. Paris: OECD. Asendorpf, J. B., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2003). Personality relationship transaction in adolescence: Core versus surface personality characteristics. Journal of Personality, 71, 629–662.
  9. Bahar, H. H., & Kağan, M. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarında özyeterlik algılarının yordayıcısı olarak beş faktör kişilik özellikleri. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(3), 676-686.
  10. Baltaoğlu, M. G., Sucuoğlu, H., Yurdabakan, İ. (2015). Öğretmen Adaylarının Öz-yeterlik Algıları ve Başarı/Başarısızlık Yüklemeleri: Boylamsal Bir Araştırma. İlköğretim Online, 14(3), 803-814.
  11. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Beaubien, J. M., & Payne, S. C. (1999, April). Individual goal orientation as a predictor of job and academic performance: A meta-analytic review and integration. In meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA. Bektas-Cetinkaya, Y., & Oruc, N. (2011). Effects of socioeconomic status and physical learning environment on motivation of university students. European Journal of Social Sciences, 21(1), 71-79.
  12. Blank, L. M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A beter warranty for student understanding. Science Education, 84(4), 486-506.
  13. Boekaerts, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2000). Self-regulated learning: Finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 417–450).
  14. Academic Press.
  15. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R.,& Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of Self Regulation.