Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

The Use of Exploratory Graph Analysis to Validate Trust in Relationships Scale

Sayfa
542–552
Yayın Tarihi
2021-09-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings of the study are believed to contribute to the validity of the already existing Trust in Relationships Scale.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Today, various methods have been developed with a purpose to determine the number of factors underlying a construct.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, there is no definitive agreement on which techniques to be preferred to extract the underlying dimensions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings of the study are believed to contribute to the validity of the already existing Trust in Relationships Scale.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Trust in relationships · Exploratory graph analysis · Network psychometrics

Özet

Today, various methods have been developed with a purpose to determine the number of factors underlying a construct. However, there is no definitive agreement on which techniques to be preferred to extract the underlying dimensions. To this end, Exploratory Graphical Analysis (EGA), a recently proposed method, has been compared with traditional methods and the results have revealed that the EGA is less affected from conditions like sample size and inter-dimensional correlation. Besides, it provides more stable results across different conditions. Considering the attractive opportunities it offers, this method has taken its place in the literature as a remarkable alternative to traditional methods. The EGA provides unique outputs compared to other factor extraction techniques. Considering this, interpreting the results obtained within this new and promising framework is assumed to contribute to validation studies. Based on this reality, this study aims to apply the EGA method to Trust in Relations Scale (TRS) and therefore to contribute to its validity. The investigation of TRS’s reliability and validity has already been documented, presenting research opportunities to researchers in the field of positive psychology. The results revealed that, the EGA produces dimensionality structures identical to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In addition, further psychometrical indicators within the framework of network analysis are provided. The findings of the study are believed to contribute to the validity of the already existing Trust in Relationships Scale.

Abstract

Today, various methods have been developed with a purpose to determine the number of factors underlying a construct. However, there is no definitive agreement on which techniques to be preferred to extract the underlying dimensions. To this end, Exploratory Graphical Analysis (EGA), a recently proposed method, has been compared with traditional methods and the results have revealed that the EGA is less affected from conditions like sample size and inter-dimensional correlation. Besides, it provides more stable results across different conditions. Considering the attractive opportunities it offers, this method has taken its place in the literature as a remarkable alternative to traditional methods. The EGA provides unique outputs compared to other factor extraction techniques. Considering this, interpreting the results obtained within this new and promising framework is assumed to contribute to validation studies. Based on this reality, this study aims to apply the EGA method to Trust in Relations Scale (TRS) and therefore to contribute to its validity. The investigation of TRS’s reliability and validity has already been documented, presenting research opportunities to researchers in the field of positive psychology. The results revealed that, the EGA produces dimensionality structures identical to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In addition, further psychometrical indicators within the framework of network analysis are provided. The findings of the study are believed to contribute to the validity of the already existing Trust in Relationships Scale.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AVCU, A. (2021). The Use of Exploratory Graph Analysis to Validate Trust in Relationships Scale. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 542–552. https://ajindex.com/articles/717049

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Al-Salom, P., & Miller, C. J. (2017). The problem with online data collection: predicting invalid responding in undergraduate samples. Modern Psychological Studies, 22(2), 2. doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9674-9
  2. Al-Salom, P., & Miller, C. J. (2017). The problem with online data collection: predicting invalid responding in undergraduate samples. Modern Psychological Studies, 22(2), 2. doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9674-9
  3. Bandalos, D. L., & Boehm-Kaufman, M. R. (2009). Four common misconceptions in exploratory factor analysis. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (p. 61–87). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Bandalos, D. L., & Boehm-Kaufman, M. R. (2009). Four common misconceptions in exploratory factor analysis. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (p. 61–87). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  4. Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  5. Chen, J., Chen, Z., (2008). Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. Biometrika, 95, 759-771. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asn034 Chen, J., Chen, Z., (2008). Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. Biometrika, 95, 759-771. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asn034 Christensen, A. P., Golino, H. F., & Silvia, P. (2019). A psychometric network perspective on the measurement and assessment of personality traits. PsyArXiv. doi:10.31234/osf.io/ktejp. Christensen, A. P., Golino, H. F., & Silvia, P. (2019). A psychometric network perspective on the measurement and assessment of personality traits. PsyArXiv. doi:10.31234/osf.io/ktejp. Christensen, A. P., & Golino, H. (2021). On the equivalency of factor and network loadings. Behavior research methods, Advance online publication. doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01500-6
  6. Christensen, A. P., & Golino, H. (2021). On the equivalency of factor and network loadings. Behavior research methods, Advance online publication. doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01500-6
  7. Demirci, İ. & Ekşi. H. (2018). Keep calm and be happy: A mixed method study from character strengths to well-being. Educational Sciences: Theory & Pra