Dergiler / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: Özel Sayı-1

Investigation on the Effect of Increasing Water Insufficiency on the Productivity and the Physical Grain Properties of Common Winter Wheat Cultivars

Sayfa
1177–1187
Yayın Tarihi
2014-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This tendency was valid in all three years of the experiment, the differences with the other cultivars being within the range 5 – 19.9 g

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The trial was carried out in a specially constructed greenhouse.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:During the period of investigation (2011 – 2013), the experiment involved 11 common wheat cultivars in 4 replications.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This tendency was valid in all three years of the experiment, the differences with the other cultivars being within the range 5 – 19.9 g
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2011 – 2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Wheat · Cultivars · Drought stress

Abstract

The trial was carried out in a specially constructed greenhouse. During the period of investigation (2011 – 2013), the experiment involved 11 common wheat cultivars in 4 replications. The cultivars were grown on Haplic Chernozems under two regimes of water supply – optimal (OWS) and increasing water insufficiency, or water deficit (WD) till the end of the growing season. The water regimes were imitated by watering and maintenance of 80-85 % of MSMA (marginal soil moisture absorption) and by causing of drought at 45-50 % MSMA. Under the optimal water regime, cultivars Bojana, Bolyarka, Rada and Bezostaya 1 formed maximal total shoot biomass. The water insufficiency sharply decreased the productivity of the cultivars with a mean of 35.52 % in comparison to the optimal water regime. Highest total shoot biomass was measured in cultivars Yantur, Bojana and Rada. Under both regimes of water supply, cultivars Bojana, Bolyarka, Lazarka, Rada and Yantur had highest productivity. The increasing water insufficiency during the growing season of the crop caused lower amplitudes in the variation of the investigated indices in cultivar Lazarka as compared to all other cultivars. This cultivar had the highest harvest index under severe drought. The working efficiency of a vegetation mass unit regardless of the water supply was highest in cultivar Bolyarka. Under severe water insufficiency the same was valid for cultivars Lazarka, Neda, Slaveya and Yantur. The water insufficiency contributed to the decrease of the absolute weight of the grain with 28.3 % and caused significant variation of the values depending on the cultivar. Cultivars Bojana, Bezostaya 1, Bolyarka, Dragana and Lazarka were significantly less affected by the severe insufficiency of soil moisture and possessed larger grain than the rest of the cultivars. Under optimal water supply in the course of the growing season, cultivar Bolyarka had the largest grain. This tendency was valid in all three years of the experiment, the differences with the other cultivars being within the range 5 – 19.9 g

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NANKOVA, M., BANKOVAATANASOVA, G., TSENOV, N., PETROVA, T., IVANOVA, A. (2014). Investigation on the Effect of Increasing Water Insufficiency on the Productivity and the Physical Grain Properties of Common Winter Wheat Cultivars. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: Özel Sayı-1, 1177–1187. https://ajindex.com/articles/706768

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Akram, M. 2011. Growth and yield components of wheat under water stress of different growth stages, Bangladesh J. Agril. Res., 36 (3):455- 468 Duan, L., C. Guan, J. Li, A. E. Eneji, Z. Li, Z. Zhai. 2008. Compensative Effects of Chemical Regulation with Uniconazole on Physiological Damages Caused by Water Deficiency during the Grain Filling Stage of Wheat, Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 194 (1):9-14 FAO, 2006. World reference base for soil resources. Rome, Italy. Ivanova, А., N. Tsenov, 2011. Winter wheat productivity under favorable and drought environments I. An overall effect, Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 17 (6):777-782 Jäger, K., A. Fábián, G. Eitel, L. Szabó, C. Deák, B. Barnabás, I. Papp. 2014. A morpho- physiological approach differentiates bread wheat cultivars of contrasting tolerance under cyclic water stress, Journal of Plant Physiology, 171 (14):1256-1266
  2. M., Johari-Pireivatlou, H. Evaluation of 10 wheat cultivars under water stress at Moghan (Iran) condition, African Journal of Biotechnology, 10 (53):10900- 10905 Maralian. 2011.
  3. Khakwani, A., M. D. Dennett, M. Munir, M. S. Baloch. 2012. Wheat yield responce to physiological limitations under water stress conditions, The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 22 (3):773-780
  4. Kharel, T. P., D. E. Clay, Sh. A. Clay, D. Beck, Ch. Reese, Gr. Carlson, H. Park. 2011. Nitrogen and Water Stress Affect Winter Wheat Yield and Dough Quality, Agron. J. 103:1389–1396
  5. Kiliç, H., T. Yaĝbasanlar. 2010. The Effect of Drought Stress on Grain Yield, Yield Components and some Quality Traits of Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) Cultivars, Notulae Botanicae Horti AgrobotaniciCluj-Napoca, 38 (1): 164-170
  6. Li, P., J. Chen, P. Wu. 2011. Agronomic Characteristics and Grain Yield of 30 Spring Wheat Genotypes under Drought Stress and Nonstress Conditions, Agron. J. 103:1619– 1628 Montazar, A., B. Azadegan. 2012. Effects of seasonal water use and applied N fertilizer on wheat Irrigation and Drainage, 61 (1):52–59
  7. Tsenov N, T. Gubatov, V. Peeva, 2006b. Study on the genotype x environment interaction in winter wheat varieties II. Grain yield, Field Crop Studies 3 (2): 167-175.
  8. Tsenov N., D. Atanasova, I. Todorov, V. Dochev. 2008a. Environmental effect on common winter wheat productivity, In: J. Prohens and M. L. Badenes (Eds), “Modern Variety Breeding for Present and Future Needs”, Proceedings of the 18th EUCARPIA General Congress, 9-12 September 2008,
  9. Valencia, Spain, pp. 480-484
  10. Tsenov N., T. Petrova and E. Tsenova, 200