KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Language Abilities of Monolingual Turkish Speaking Children who Stutter Değerlendirmesi / Türkçe Konuşan Tek Dilli Kekemeliği Olan Çocukların Dil Yetileri

Ayşe Aydın Ünsal
Saniye Tülin Fidan
Sayfa
31–35
Yayın Tarihi
2017-03-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Anahtar Kelimeler: kekemelik, alıcı dil, ifade edici dil, türkçe

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine differences in language abilities between children who stutter and their age and gender matched peers with typical development.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this cross-sectional study, subjects were two groups of 25 children (N = 50) between the ages of 3;5 and 7;11 (years; months) who do (CWS) (mean age = 6;5 ) and do not stutter (CWNS) (mean age = 6;4).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Anahtar Kelimeler: kekemelik, alıcı dil, ifade edici dil, türkçe
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:stuttering · receptive language · expressive language

Özet

Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine differences in language abilities between children who stutter and their age and gender matched peers with typical development. In this cross-sectional study, subjects were two groups of 25 children (N = 50) between the ages of 3;5 and 7;11 (years; months) who do (CWS) (mean age = 6;5 ) and do not stutter (CWNS) (mean age = 6;4). We administered the Turkish version of Test of Early Language Development (TELD-3) to evaluate receptive and expressive language abilities of children participated in this study. The main findings of the study were that expressive subtest and composite scores of CWS on TELD-3-T were significantly lower than CWNS while the difference between groups was not significant on TELD-3-T receptive subtest score. Expressive language scores and total language scores of CWS are below their peers. Keywords: stuttering, receptive language, expressive language, turkishÖzet: Bu çalışmanın amacı kekemeliği olan ve yaş ve cinsiyetleri eşleştirilmiş tipik gelişim gösteren çocukların dil performanslarının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Kekemeliği olan 3;5 ve 7;11 yaşları arasındaki 25 çocuğa (ort.=6;5) ve yaş ve cinsiyetleri eşleştirilmiş tipik gelişim gösteren akranlarına (ort.=6;4) Türkçe Erken Dil Gelişim Testi (TEDİL) uygulanarak alıcı ve ifade edici dil becerileri değerlendirilmiştir. Kekemeliği olan çocukların TEDİL testinin ifade edici dil ve toplam dil puanı ortalamaları tipik gelişim gösteren çocuklardan anlamlı düzeyde düşük bulunurken, alıcı dil alt testinde iki grup arasında anlamlı düzeyde bir farklılık bulunmamıştır. Kekemeliği olan çocukların ifade edici dil ve toplam dil performansları yaşıtlarının gerisindedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: kekemelik, alıcı dil, ifade edici dil, türkçe

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ünsal, A. A., Fidan, S. T. (2017). Language Abilities of Monolingual Turkish Speaking Children who Stutter Değerlendirmesi / Türkçe Konuşan Tek Dilli Kekemeliği Olan Çocukların Dil Yetileri. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 31–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/694997

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Arndt, J., & Healey, E. C. (2001). Concomitant disorders in school-age children who stutter. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(2), 68-78
  2. Bernstein Ratner, N. (1997). Stuttering: A psycholinguistic perspective. Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions, 2, 99-127
  3. Wingate, M. E. (2001). SLD is not stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(2), 381-383
  4. Anderson, J. D., & Conture, E. G. (2001). Language abilities of children who stutter: A preliminary study. Journal of fluency disorders, 25(4), 283-304
  5. Brown, S. F. (1945). The loci of stutterings in the speech sequence. Journal of Speech Disorders, 10(3), 181-192
  6. Bloodstein, O. (2006). Some empirical observations about early stuttering: A possible link to language development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39(3), 185-191
  7. Silverman, E. M., & Williams, D. E. (1968). A comparison of stuttering and nonstuttering children in terms of five measures of oral language development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 1(4), 305-309
  8. Watkins, R. V., Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. G. (1999). Early Childhood Stuttering IIIInitial Status of Expressive Language Abilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(5), 1125-1135
  9. Westby, C. E. (1979). Language performance of stuttering and nonstuttering children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 12(2), 133-145
  10. Andrews, G., Craig, A., Feyer, A., Hoddinott, S., Howie, P., Neilson, M. (1983). Stuttering: A review of research findings and theories circa. JSLHR, 48 (3), 226–246
  11. Owens, R.E. (2012). Language development: An introduction. 8th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
  12. Ratner, N. B., & Sih, C. C. (1987). Effects of gradual increases in sentence length and complexity on children's dysfluency. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52(3), 278-287
  13. Bernstein Ratner, N., Sih, C.C. (1987). Effects of gradual increases in sentence length and complexity on children’s dysfluency. JSHD, 52 (3), 278–287
  14. Melnick, K. S., & Conture, E. G. (2000). Relationship of length and grammatical complexity to the systematic and nonsystematic speech errors and stuttering of children who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 25(1), 21-45
  15. Watkins, R. V., Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. G. (1999). Early Childhood Stuttering IIIInitial Status of Expressive Language Abilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(5), 1125-1135
  16. Häge, A. (2001). Können kognit