Dergiler / Marmara Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity screening tool

Sayfa
319–326
Yayın Tarihi
2021-10-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test result was found to be appropriateas 0.771.Conclusion: The study shows that the FNPA-TR scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool for the Turkish population.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Family Nutrition and PhysicalActivity (FNPA-TR) screening tool.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The data were collected between Mayand June 2018.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test result was found to be appropriateas 0.771.Conclusion: The study shows that the FNPA-TR scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool for the Turkish population.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Family nutrition · Childhood obesity · Physical activity

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Family Nutrition and PhysicalActivity (FNPA-TR) screening tool. This study was conducted as a methodological research. The data were collected between Mayand June 2018. The population of the study consisted of 1126 first and fourth grade students and their families in three primary publicschools that represent three socioeconomic statuses (high, medium, low) in Istanbul, Turkey.Materials and Methods: Data were collected from 727 students and their families with an introductory information form and theFNPA-TR screening tool. The validity of content scale was evaluated by comparing the relationship between FNPA-TR scores andanswers given to non-scale questions measuring the eating behaviour. In this study, Cronbach’s alpha, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin, Varimaxrotation and ICC coefficients statistical tests were used to measure validity and reliability.Results: The Cronbach alpha coefficient for the internal consistency of the scale was 0.724. The test-retest reliability coefficient of thescale had a medium to very high level that ranged from 0.422 to 0.925. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test result was found to be appropriateas 0.771.Conclusion: The study shows that the FNPA-TR scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool for the Turkish population.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EKICI, E., IKIISIK, H., ANKARALI, H., MANAV, G., COLAK, M., KOZAN, E. H. (2021). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity screening tool. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 319–326. https://ajindex.com/articles/688301

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Maziak W, Ward KD, Stockton MB. Childhood obesity: are we missing the big picture? Obes Rev. 2008 Jan;9(1):35-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00376.x
  2. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. Key facts. 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/ factsheets/fs311/en/. (Accessed: 21 March 2020
  3. Monitoring the Growth of School Age Children (6-10 Age Group) in Turkey (TOÇBİ) Project Research Report, Ministry of Health, General Directorate of Basic Health Services, Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Ministry of National Education, Ministry of Health Publication No: 834;2011 [4] Public Health England, Chilhood Obesity Health Risks. 2013. Available from: http://www.noo.org.uk/NOO_about_obesity/ obesity_and_health/health_risk_child. (Accessed: 20 May 2020
  4. Guidelines For Adolescent Nutrition Services. Stang J, Story M (eds). 2015. Available from: http://www.epi.umn.edu/let/ pubs/img/adol_preface_materials.pdf. (Accessed: September, 2020
  5. Kansra AR, Lakkunarajah S, Jay MS. Childhood and adolescent obesity: a review. Front Pediatr 2021;12;8:581461. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.581461
  6. Herbenick SK, James K Milton J, Cannon D. Effects of family nutrition and physical activity screening for obesity risk in school-age children. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2018; 23:e12229. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12229 [8] World Health Organization. Report Of The Commision On Ending Childhood Obesity. 2016. Availableform: http://apps. who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204176/1/978.924.1510066_ eng.pdf. (Accessed: September, 2020
  7. Tucker JM, Howard K, Guseman EH, Yee KE, Saturley H, Eisenmann JC. Association between the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity Screening Tool and obesity severity in youth referred to weight management. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2017 May-Jun;11(3):268-275. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2016.09.007
  8. Stang J, Bonilla Z. Factors Affecting Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviors of Hispanic Families With Young Children: Implications for Obesity Policies and Programs. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Nov-Dec;50(10):959-967. doi: 10.1016/j. jneb.2017.08.005
  9. Taverno Ross SE, Clennin MN, Dowda M, Colabianchi C, Pate RR. Stepping It Up: Walking Behaviors in Children Transitioning from 5th to 7th Grade. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018; Feb 3;15(2). pii: E262. doi: 10.3390/ ijerph15020262 [12] Toruner EK, Ayaz S, Savaser S. Parents’ perceptions about weights of their children. Hemar-G. 2014;