Dergiler / Marine Science and Technology Bulletin / 2015 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Effects of different probiotic bacteria on growth, body composition, immune response and hematological parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under sublethal water temperature

Sayfa
21–28
Yayın Tarihi
2016-07-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, it might be suggested that L. plantarum can be used as a beneficial dietary probiotic in rainbow trout reared under sublethal water temperature.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus plantarum, Bacillus subtilis and their mix additives on growth performance, body composition, immune response and hematological parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under sublethal water temperature.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Feeding trial was carried out for 60 days.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, it might be suggested that L. plantarum can be used as a beneficial dietary probiotic in rainbow trout reared under sublethal water temperature.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Probiotics · Rainbow trout · Bacillus

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus plantarum, Bacillus subtilis and their mix additives on growth performance, body composition, immune response and hematological parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under sublethal water temperature. Feeding trial was carried out for 60 days. The first group was fed with commercial feed plus fish oil. The second and third groups were given commercial feed plus Lactobacillus plantarum and Bacillus subtilis at a rate of 107 CFU g-1 fish oil, respectively. The fourth group was also fed with commercial feed plus 50% of both probiotic bacteria. After 60 days, there were no differences among the survival rates and body proximate composition of experimental groups. Results also showed that all additives (L. plantarum, B. subtilis and their mix) to diets had no significant effect on growth parameters of rainbow trout, although the fish fed the diet with L. plantarum had statistically better feed conversion ratio (FCR) compared to the other groups (p<0.05). However, the additives could improve the immunity and alter hematological parameters of the rainbow trout. In conclusion, it might be suggested that L. plantarum can be used as a beneficial dietary probiotic in rainbow trout reared under sublethal water temperature.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yazıcı, I. S., Hisar, O., Yilmaz, S., Yigit, M. (2016). Effects of different probiotic bacteria on growth, body composition, immune response and hematological parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under sublethal water temperature. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 21–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/688191

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Acu, A. 2000. Beytepe göleti’nin su kalitesinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Postgraduate Thesis, Department of Aquaculture, Science Institute of Ankara University, Ankara- Türkiye. Akbulut, M., Kaya, H., Çelik, E.S., Odabaşi, D. A., Odabaşi, S. And K. Selvi. 2010. Assessment of surface water quality in the Atikhisar reservoir and Sarıçay creek (Çanakkale, Turkey). Ekoloji, 19(74):139-149.
  2. Akyurt, İ. and Ö. Ayik. 1995. Su kirliliği ve kontrolü. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Yayınları No:143, Erzurum. Anonymous, 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (1998). American Public Health Association, 7th Edition.
  3. Washington, USA. Anonymous, 2012. Yüzeysel su kalitesi yönetimi yönetmeliği T.C. Resmi Gazete Sayı:28483, Ankara Anonymous, 2013. T.C. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı su kalitesi yönetimi çalışma grubu raporu. Ormancılık ve Su Şurası 21-23 Mart 2013.
  4. Arslan, N., Tokatli, C., Çiçek, A. and E. Köse. 2011. Yedigöller (Kütahya) bölgesinde su ve sediment örneklerinde bazı metal seviyelerinin belirlenmesi. Review of Hydrobiology, 4(1):17-28.
  5. Atay D. and Pulatsü, S. 2000. Su kirlenmesi ve kontrolü. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No:1513, Ankara.
  6. Ayvaz, M., Tenekecioğlu, E. and E. Koru. 2011. Afsar baraj gölünün (Manisa- Türkiye) trofik statüsünün belirlenmesi. Ekoloji, 20(81):37-47.
  7. Boyd, C.E. 1998.
  8. Water quality for pond aquaculture, Alabama agricultural experiment station, Research and Development Series No:43, Auburn- USA. Boyd, C.E. and C.S. Tucker. 1998. Pond aquaculture water quality management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 700. Gleick, P.H. 1996. Basic Water Requirements for human activities: meeting basic needs. Water International, 21:83-92.
  9. Harper, D. 1992. Eutrophication of freshwaters: principles, problems and restoration. London, Chapyen Hall. p. 78. İmamoğlu, Ö. 2000. Dipsiz ve Çini (Muğla – Aydın) Çayı’nın su kalitesinin fizikokimyasal ve biyolojik (bentik makroinvertebrat) yönden incelenmesi. Postgraduate Thesis, Department of Biology, Science Institute of Muğla University, Muğla-Türkiye. Kara, C. and Gömlekçioğlu, V., 2004, Karaçay (Kahramanmaraş) 'ın kirliliğinin biyolojik ve fiziko- kimyasal parametrelerle incelenmesi. Kahramanmaraş. Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi 7.1, pp. 1-7.
  10. Küçük, S. 2007. Investigation of water of quality parameters of the büyük menderes river for fisheries. A.D.U. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 4(1-2):7-13.
  11. Mert, R., Bulut, S., Yildiri