KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 165 - Sayı: 165

Geological characteristics of the boundary between Bolkardağı-Bozkır Units and the Ulukışla Basin and the structural evolution of the region, Central Taurides, Turkey

Tolga ESİRTGEN
Veysel IŞIK
Sayfa
163–190
Yayın Tarihi
2021-08-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These structural data in the region were interpreted as the product of a movement from southeast to northwest.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The character of the boundary between the tectonic units in the Central Taurides and the Ulukışla Basin is controversial.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Field data and structural analysis reveal that the contact between the Ulukışla Basin deposits and the Bolkardağı Unit in the study area is of 70° - 80° southeast dipping reverse fault character.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These structural data in the region were interpreted as the product of a movement from southeast to northwest.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Tectonic contact · Structural analysis · Paleostress

Abstract

The character of the boundary between the tectonic units in the Central Taurides and the Ulukışla Basin is controversial. The contact has been accepted as discordant or tectonic contact by different researchers. The deformation data of the units in the study area provide important information about the Mesozoic - Cenozoic period geological developments of the region. Regional compression in NW - SE direction has caused the development of fold, foliation and reverse fault type structures in the units in the study area. Similar structural deformations are observed in the rock units defined in the Ulukışla Basin as well. In this study, structural data were collected from the field in order to determine the deformation pattern and contact relations of the units in the region. Field data and structural analysis reveal that the contact between the Ulukışla Basin deposits and the Bolkardağı Unit in the study area is of 70° - 80° southeast dipping reverse fault character. These structural data in the region were interpreted as the product of a movement from southeast to northwest.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ESİRTGEN, T., IŞIK, V. (2021). Geological characteristics of the boundary between Bolkardağı-Bozkır Units and the Ulukışla Basin and the structural evolution of the region, Central Taurides, Turkey. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 165 - Sayı: 165, 163–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/687156

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Alan, İ., Şahin, Ş., Keskin, H., Altun, İ., Bakırhan, Balcı, V. B., Böke, N., Saçlı, L., Pehlivan, Ş., Kop, A., Hanilçi, N., Çelik, Ö. F. 2007. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi Orta Torosların Jeodinamik Evrimi Ereğli (Konya) - Ulukışla (Niğde) - Karsantı (Adana) - Namrun (İçel) Yöresi. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Rapor No: 11006, Ankara (unpublished). Alan, İ., Şahin, Ş., Bakırhan, B. 2011. 1:100.000 ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları, Adana N-33 Paftası. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, No: 166. Allmendinger, R. W., Cardozo, N. C., Fisher, D. 2013. Structural Geology Algorithms: Vectors & Tensors: Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press 289. Blumenthal, M. M. 1941. Un aperçu de la géologie du Taurus dans les vilayets de Niğde et d’Adana. Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA) Publication B-6, 49-95.
  2. Blumenthal, M. M. 1952. Das Taurische Hochgebirge Aladag, neuere forschungen zu seiner Geographie, Stratigraphie und Tektonik. Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA) Publication D-6. Blumenthal, M. M. 1956. Yüksek Bolkardağ’ın kuzey kenar bölgelerinin ve batı uzantılarının jeolojisi. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Yayını Seri D, No: 7, 153, Ankara.
  3. Candan, O., Çetinkaplan, M., Oberhänsli, R., Rimmelé, G., Akal, C. 2005. Alpine high - P/low-T metamorphism of the Afyon Zone and implications for the metamorphic evolution of Western Anatolia, Turkey. Lithos 84(1-2), 102- 124. Clark, M., Robertson, A.H.F. 2002. The role of the Early Tertiary Ulukışla Basin, Southern Turkey, in suturing of the Mesozoic Tethys ocean. Journal of Geological Society, London 159, 673-690.
  4. Clark, M., Robertson, A. H. F. 2005. Uppermost Cretaceous- Lower Tertiary Ulukışla Basin, south - central Turkey: sedimentary evolution of part of a unified basin complex within an evolving Neotethyan suture zone. Sedimentary Geology 173, 15-51.
  5. Çalapkulu, F. 1978. Bolkardağ bölgesinin jeolojik evrimi. Türk. Jeol. Kurumu, 32. Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurul. Bildiri özetleri, 7-8.
  6. Çalapkulu, F. 1980. Horoz Granodiyoritinin Jeolojik İncelemesi. Türk. Jeol. Kurumu 23, 59-68.
  7. Çelik, Ö. F., Delaloye, M., Feraud, G. 2006. Precise 40Ar - 39Ar ages from the metamorphic sole rocks of the Tauride Belt Ophiolites, southern Turkey: implications for the rapid cooling history. Geol. Mag. 143(02), 213. Çelik, Ö. F., Marzoli, A., Marschik, R,. Chiaradia, M., Neubauer, F., Öz, I. 2011. Early - Middle J