Dergiler / Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Does Timing of Treatment Have an Effect on Survival in Ovarian Carcinoma?

Sayfa
877–883
Yayın Tarihi
2022-09-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: It was shown numerically, although not statistically significant, that a long time between NACT and CRS and CRS-adjuvant therapy had a negative effect on OS.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background and Purpose: Optimal cytoreduction (CRS) is the main treatment modality in epithelial ovarian cancer (OC).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of sixty-nine patients with OC who underwent CRS after NACT between December 2009 and May 2020 were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: It was shown numerically, although not statistically significant, that a long time between NACT and CRS and CRS-adjuvant therapy had a negative effect on OS.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Adjuvant Chemotherapy · Cytoreductive Surgery · Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Optimal cytoreduction (CRS) is the main treatment modality in epithelial ovarian cancer (OC). Inoperable OC at the time of diagnosis may become eligible for CRS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We aimed to investigate the effect of the time between NACT-CRS and CRS-adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in OC patients. Materials and Methods: Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of sixty-nine patients with OC who underwent CRS after NACT between December 2009 and May 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The median age was 61.1, and the median overall survival (OS) was 75.8 months. The median time from the end of NACT to CRS was 6.53 weeks, and the median time from CRS to initiation of adjuvant therapy was 4.8 weeks. The mean OS was 123.4 months in patients with a NACT-CRS interval of 6.53 weeks or less, and it was 61.6 months in patients above this period (p>0.05). The OS was 75.7 months in patients with an interval between CRS and adjuvant therapy of 4.8 weeks or less and 55.1 months compared to those with 4.8 weeks or more (p>0.05). Conclusion: It was shown numerically, although not statistically significant, that a long time between NACT and CRS and CRS-adjuvant therapy had a negative effect on OS.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SEMİZ, H. S., KESKİNKILIÇ, M., ARICI, Z., BADEM, F., CAN, B., SANCI, M. (2022). Does Timing of Treatment Have an Effect on Survival in Ovarian Carcinoma?. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 877–883. https://ajindex.com/articles/675002

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Berek JS, Renz M, Kehoe S, Kumar L, Friedlander M. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;155 Suppl 1:61-85. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13878
  2. Berek JS, Renz M, Kehoe S, Kumar L, Friedlander M. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;155 Suppl 1:61-85. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13878
  3. Park SJ, Kim J, Kim SN et al. Practice patterns of surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: analysis from international surveys. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;49(2):137-145. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyy175. PMID: 30521037
  4. Park SJ, Kim J, Kim SN et al. Practice patterns of surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: analysis from international surveys. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;49(2):137-145. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyy175. PMID: 30521037
  5. Kuroki L, Guntupalli SR. Treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. BMJ. 2020;371:m3773. Published 2020 Nov 9. doi:10.1136/BMJ.m3773
  6. Kuroki L, Guntupalli SR. Treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. BMJ. 2020;371:m3773. Published 2020 Nov 9. doi:10.1136/BMJ.m3773
  7. Huang CY, Cheng M, Lee NR et al. Comparing Paclitaxel-Carboplatin with Paclitaxel-Cisplatin as the Front-Line Chemotherapy for Patients with FIGO IIIC Serous-Type Tubo-Ovarian Cancer. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 26;17(7):2213. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072213. PMID: 32224896; PMCID: PMC7177627
  8. Huang CY, Cheng M, Lee NR et al. Comparing Paclitaxel-Carboplatin with Paclitaxel-Cisplatin as the Front-Line Chemotherapy for Patients with FIGO IIIC Serous-Type Tubo-Ovarian Cancer. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 26;17(7):2213. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072213. PMID: 32224896; PMCID: PMC7177627
  9. Elies A, Rivière S, Pouget N et al. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Jun;18(6):555-566. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1458614. Epub 2018 Apr 10. PMID: 29633903
  10. Elies A, Rivière S, Pouget N et al. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Jun;18(6):555-566. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1458614. Epub 2018 Apr 10. PMID: 29633903
  11. Fagotti A, Ferrandina MG, Vizzielli G et al. Randomized trial of primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (SCORPION-NCT01461850). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1657-1664. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001640. Epub 2020 Oct 7. PMID: 33028623
  12. Fagotti A, Ferrandina MG, Vizzielli G et al. Randomized trial of pr