Dergiler / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Morphometric Analysis of Saz-Çayırova Drainage Basin using Geographic Information Systems and Different Digital Elevation Models

Sayfa
177–186
Yayın Tarihi
2022-06-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The outcomes of this study reveal that the most consistent results with the TOPO DEM are provided by SRTM DEM, following the NASA DEM.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Drainage basin/watershed analysis based on morphometric parameters has an essential role in watershed management and planning.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, the TOPO DEM, whose horizontal resolution is 30 m, was produced from 1:25K scaled digitized topographical maps.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The outcomes of this study reveal that the most consistent results with the TOPO DEM are provided by SRTM DEM, following the NASA DEM.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Basin Morphometric Analysis · ASTER GDEM · SRTM DEM

Abstract

Drainage basin/watershed analysis based on morphometric parameters has an essential role in watershed management and planning. Reliable delineation of watersheds and drainage networks is critical for hydrological and geomorphological studies. Since access to high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) and digital surface models (DSMs) is costly, many researchers need to evaluate low-resolution open-source products. Several data sources produced from different surveying techniques are used in the morphometric analysis. In this study, five different datasets such as Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) GDEM, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) DEM, Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) DSM, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) DEM, and a DEM from topographic maps (TOPO DEM), were investigated based on morphometric parameters. The tests was carried out in the Saz-Çayırova Basin, which is one of the critical urbanization and industrialization regions of Kocaeli, Turkey. In this study, the TOPO DEM, whose horizontal resolution is 30 m, was produced from 1:25K scaled digitized topographical maps. It was used for comparative analysis, as in all DEMs sources. The morphometric parameters' result of the TOPO DEM was used as the reference data for comparing the results of the other DEMs sources. In addition, the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was used to compute the accuracy between the freely available DEMs and the TOPO DEM for each morphometric parameter. The outcomes of this study reveal that the most consistent results with the TOPO DEM are provided by SRTM DEM, following the NASA DEM.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KILIÇ, B., GÜLGEN, F., ÇELEN, M., ÖNCEL, S., ORUÇ, H., VURAL, S. (2022). Morphometric Analysis of Saz-Çayırova Drainage Basin using Geographic Information Systems and Different Digital Elevation Models. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 177–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/672517

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Bildirici, İ. Ö., & Abbak, R. A. (2017). Comparison of ASTER and SRTM digital elevation models at one-arc-second resolution over Turkey. Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 5(1), 16-25.
  2. Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., & Mays, L. W. (1988).
  3. Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. Crippen, R., Buckley, S., Agram, P., Belz, E., Gurrola, E., Hensley, S., Kobrick, M., Lavalle, M., Martin, J., Neumann, M., Nguyen, Q., Rosen, P., Shimada, J., Simard, M., & Tung, W., (2016). Nasadem global elevation model: methods and progress. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLI-B4, 125–128.
  4. Esper Angillieri, M. Y. (2008). Morphometric analysis of Colangüil river basin and flash flood hazard, San Juan, Argentina. Environmental geology, 55(1), 107-111.
  5. Gessler, P., Pike, R., MacMillan, R. A., Hengl, T., & Reuter, H. I. (2009). The future of geomorphometry. Developments in Soil Science, 33, 637-652.
  6. Gravelius, H., (1914). Grundrifi der gesamten Gewcisserkunde. Band I: Flufikunde (Compendium of Hydrology, vol. I. Rivers, in German). Germany: Goschen, Berlin. Gülgen, F. (2017). A stream ordering approach based on network analysis operations. Geocarto International, 32(3), 322-333.
  7. Horton, R. E. (1932). Drainage-basin characteristics. Transactions, American geophysical union, 13(1), 350-361.
  8. Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological society of America bulletin, 56(3), 275-370.
  9. Jenson, S. K. (1991). Applications of hydrologic information automatically extracted from digital elevation models. Hydrological processes, 5(1), 31-44.
  10. JPL (2021). Shuttle radar topography mission. https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/, (Erişim Tarihi: 10 Ocak 2022).
  11. Karabulut, M. S., & Özdemir, H. (2019). Comparison of basin morphometry analyses derived from different DEMs on two drainage basins in Turkey. Environmental Earth Sciences, 78(18), 1-14.
  12. Kumari, P., Kumari, R., & Kumar, D. (2021). Geospatial approach to evaluate the morphometry of Sabarmati River Basin, India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(3), 1-13.
  13. Mark, D. M. (1983). Relations between field-surveyed channel networks and map-based geomorphometric measures, Inez, Kentucky. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73(3), 358-372.
  14. MTA (2010). Maden Tetkik ve Arama Doğal Kaynaklar ve Ekonomi Bülteni, https://www.mta.gov.tr/v3.0/sayfalar