Dergiler / International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Distracted Driving Detection with Machine Learning Methods by CNN Based Feature Extraction

Sayfa
116–121
Yayın Tarihi
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is aimed that the obtained models can be used to detect driver errors over the image.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Millions of people lose their lives due to accidents caused by various reasons.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As the number of vehicles increases, the number of accidents also increases.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is aimed that the obtained models can be used to detect driver errors over the image.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Classification · Deep learning · Driver distracted

Abstract

Millions of people lose their lives due to accidents caused by various reasons. As the number of vehicles increases, the number of accidents also increases. When driver errors caused by technological devices are added to this, the rate of accidents is increasing more and more. Generally, the vast majority of accidents occur as a result of distractions from drivers. For this reason, there is a need for a system based on the detection of driver errors and warning the driver in modern vehicles. For this purpose, the analysis of the convolutional neural network (CNN) feature extraction based classification models was carried out in this study. The SequeezeNet CNN architecture is trained with the transfer learning method and the image features are taken before the classification layer. The images were classified by giving the obtained features as input to k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) machine learning algorithms. A 10-class dataset containing 22,424 driver error images was used in the training of the models. Classification successes of k-NN, SVM, RF models trained with images are 98.1%, 95.8%, and 88.7%, respectively. The highest classification success was obtained from the k-NN model. Other performance measurement metrics were also used for the detailed analysis of the classification models. It is aimed to find the most suitable model by comparing the training and testing times of the models. It is aimed that the obtained models can be used to detect driver errors over the image.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AL-DOORI, S. K. S., TASPINAR, Y. S., KOKLU, M. (2021). Distracted Driving Detection with Machine Learning Methods by CNN Based Feature Extraction. International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 116–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/672401

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Arnold, P. K., Hartley, L. R., Corry, A., Hochstadt, D., Penna, F., & Feyer, A. M., Hours of work, and perceptions of fatigue among truck drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1997. 29(4): p. 471-477.
  2. Philip, P., Sagaspe, P., Moore, N., Taillard, J., Charles, A., Guilleminault, C., & Bioulac, B., Fatigue, sleep restriction and driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2005. 37(3): p. 473-478.
  3. Beirness, D.J., H.M. Simpson, and A. Pak, The road safety monitor: Driver distraction. 2002.
  4. Wahlstrom, E., O. Masoud, and N. Papanikolopoulos. Vision-based methods for driver monitoring. in Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2003.
  5. IEEE. Sagberg, F., Jackson, P., Krüger, H. P., Muzet, A., & Williams, A. J., Fatigue, sleepiness and reduced alertness as risk factors in driving. 2004: Institute of Transport Economics Oslo. Lal, S.K. and A. Craig, A critical review of the psychophysiology of driver fatigue. Biological psychology, 2001. 55(3): p. 173-194.
  6. Bayly, M., Fildes, B., Regan, M., & Young, K., Review of crash effectiveness of intelligent transport systems. Emergency, 2007. 3: p. 14. Dinges, D. and M. Mallis. Managing fatigue by drowsiness detection: Can technological promises be realized? in International Conference on Fatigue and Transportation, 3rd, 1998,
  7. Fremantle, Western Australia. 1998.
  8. Ranney, T.A., W.R. Garrott, and M.J. Goodman, NHTSA driver distraction research: Past, present, and future. 2001,
  9. Citeseer. Stutts, J. C., Reinfurt, D. W., Staplin, L., & Rodgman, E., The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes. 2001. Škrjanc, I., Andonovski, G., Ledezma, A., Sipele, O., Iglesias, J. A., & Sanchis, A., Evolving cloud-based system for the recognition of drivers’ actions. Expert Systems with Applications, 2018. 99: p. 231-238.
  10. Wang, X., Liu, Y., Wang, F., Wang, J., Liu, L., & Wang, J., Feature extraction and dynamic identification of drivers’ emotions. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 2019. 62: p. 175-191.
  11. Olabiyi, O., Martinson, E., Chintalapudi, V., & Guo, R., Driver action prediction using deep (bidirectional) recurrent neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02257, 2017.
  12. Braunagel, C., Kasneci, E., Stolzmann, W., & Rosenstiel, W., Driver-activity recognition in the context of conditionally autonomous driving. in 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2015.
  13. IEEE. Yan, S., Teng, Y., Smith, J. S., & Zhang, B. D