KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2018 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2

Two mixed randomized response models under simple and stratied random sampling with replacement schemes

Fatima BATOOL
Kaneez FATİMA
Zawar HUSSAİN
Sayfa
403–422
Yayın Tarihi
2018-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In order to get the idea of gain in efficiency and model stability numerical and graphical efficiency comparisons are done for the two models under two mentioned cases.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:We have proposed two mixed randomized response models for surveying sensitive issues.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We proved that the proposed models are unconditionally efficient than [13, 15, 16, 20].
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In order to get the idea of gain in efficiency and model stability numerical and graphical efficiency comparisons are done for the two models under two mentioned cases.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Categorical responses · Randomization · Less than completely truthful reporting

Abstract

We have proposed two mixed randomized response models for surveying sensitive issues. The properties of proposed estimators are derived under the simple and stratified random sampling schemes while considering completely and less than completely truthful reporting cases. We proved that the proposed models are unconditionally efficient than [13, 15, 16, 20]. In order to get the idea of gain in efficiency and model stability numerical and graphical efficiency comparisons are done for the two models under two mentioned cases.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BATOOL, F., FATİMA, K., HUSSAİN, Z. (2018). Two mixed randomized response models under simple and stratied random sampling with replacement schemes. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 403–422. https://ajindex.com/articles/668937

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Abdelfatah, S., and Mazloum, R. An improved strati ed randomized response model using two decks of cards, Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 10 (4), 309-320, 2015.
  2. Al-Menayes, J. Measuring the Spiritual and Behavioral Dimensions of Religiosity in a Mus- lim Sample, Asian Social Science, 12 (2), 158, 2016.
  3. Blair, Graeme, Kosuke Imai, and Yang-Yang Zhou. Design and Analysis of the Randomized Response Technique, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110 (511), 1304 - 1319, 2015.
  4. Clark, S. J., and Desharnais, R. A. Honest answers to embarrassing questions: Detecting cheating in the randomized response model, Psychological Methods, 3 (2), 160, 1998.
  5. Coutts, E., and Jann, B. Sensitive questions in online surveys: Experimental results for the randomized response technique (RRT) and the unmatched count technique (UCT), Socio- logical Methods and Research, 40 (1), 169-193, 2011.
  6. Greenberg, B. G., Abul-Ela, A. L. A., Simmons, W. R. and Horvitz, D. G. The unrelated question randomized response model: Theoretical framework, Journal of the American Sta- tistical Association, 64 (326), 520-539, 1969.
  7. Holbrook, A. L., and Krosnick, J. A. Measuring Voter Turnout By Using The Randomized Response Technique Evidence Calling Into Question The Method's Validity Public Opinion Quarterly, 74 (2), 328-343, 2010.
  8. Hong, K., Yum, J. and Lee, H. A strati ed randomized response technique Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 7, 141-147, 1994.
  9. Jin, Z., Zhu, Z., Yu, B. and Gao, Ge. A Monte Carlo Simulation Investigating the Validity and Reliability of Two Stage Cluster Sampling Survey with Sensitive Topics Computer Modelling and New Technologies, 17 (3), 69 - 75, 2013.
  10. Kim, J. M. and Elam, M. E. A two-stage strati ed Warner's randomized response model using optimal allocation Metrika, 61 (1), 1-7, 2005.
  11. Kim, J. M. and Elam, M. E. A strati ed unrelated question randomized response model Statistical Papers, 48 (2), 215-233, 2007.
  12. Kim, J. M. and Warde, W. D. A strati ed Warner's randomized response model Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 120 (1), 155-165, 2004.
  13. Kim, J. M. and Warde, W. D. A mixed randomized response model Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 133 (1), 211-221, 2005.
  14. Locander, W., Sudman, S., and Bradburn, N. An investigation of interview method, threat and response distortion Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71 (354), 269-275, 1976.
  15. Mangat, N. S., Singh, R., and Singh, S. Violation of respondent's privacy in moors'