The most important problem which is encountered by researchers who make investigations upon the issue of Alevism and Bektashism, is the matter of getting these t:wo terms mixed up and/or using one ofthem in the name of the other.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The issue of whether Alevism and Bektashism are religions independent from Islam or they are tariqats/sects connected to Islam, has always been an argument among both theorists and those who are interested in this subject.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Turks have reflected a lot of components from their former believes to preseni religious lives in Iradition because of both their characteristics and their lslamization process's being long and fluctuative.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The most important problem which is encountered by researchers who make investigations upon the issue of Alevism and Bektashism, is the matter of getting these t:wo terms mixed up and/or using one ofthem in the name of the other.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Bektashism · Alevism · Similarity
Özet
The issue of whether Alevism and Bektashism are religions independent from Islam or they are tariqats/sects connected to Islam, has always been an argument among both theorists and those who are interested in this subject. Turks have reflected a lot of components from their former believes to preseni religious lives in Iradition because of both their characteristics and their lslamization process's being long and fluctuative. In Alevi-Bektashi beliefihis situation seems to be more visi.ble. The most important problem which is encountered by researchers who make investigations upon the issue of Alevism and Bektashism, is the matter of getting these t:wo terms mixed up and/or using one ofthem in the name of the other.
AZAR, B. (2005). BENZERLiK VE FARKLILIKLAR EKSENiNDE ALEViBEKTAŞi iNANÇLARI ÜZERiNE BiR DEGERLENDiRME. Fırat Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 1–1. https://ajindex.com/articles/666010
GÖLPINARLI, Abdülbald (1994), "Bektaşilik Bir Tarikattır Ama Alevilik BirTarikat Değildir", Türk Yurdu, (Aralık) C.88, s.l4. BAHA, SAİD (2000),
Türkiye 'de Alevi-Bektaşi, Ahi ve Nusayri Zümreleri (Hzl. İsmailGörkem) Kültür Bak. Yay. Ankara BİRDOGAN, Nejat (1992), Anadolu ve Balkanlarda Alevi Yerleşme/eri, Alev Yay.İstanbul BİRGE, John Kingsley (1991), Bektaşilik Tarihi (Çev. Reha Çamuroğlu), Ant Yay.- istanbul. FAR GÜZEL, Abdurrahman (1968 ), "Alevi", Türk Ansiklopedisi, C. Il, İstanbul.
HASLUCK, F.W. (1995), Anadolu'da ve Balkanlar'da Bektaşilik (Çev. YücelDemirol) Ant Yay. İstıınbul KEÇELİ, Şakir (?),Alevilik Bo=f. 1. rda Yanan Ateş, Emel Yay. Ankara KÖPRÜLÜ, Fuad (1995a), "Bektaşiliğin Menşe'leri, ı ", (hz!. M. Yaman) CemDergisi, 5 (52) Eylül İstanbul s.7-9.
KÖPRÜLÜ, Fuad (1995b), "Bektaşiliğin Menşe'leri, II ", (hz!. M. Yaman) CemDergisi,.5. (53) Ekim İstanbul s.J0-13. KÖPRÜLÜ, Fuad (1995c), "Bektaşiliğin lvfenşe 'leri, !If', (hz!. M. Yaman) CemDergisi,.5 (52) Kasım İstanbul s.7-9.
KÜÇÜK, Hülya (2003), "Bektaşilik ve Aleviliğin Sufi ve Esotirik BoyutuKarşılaştırmalı Kavram Analizi", İslamiyat 6, (3) Temmuz-AğustosAnkara KÜÇÜK, Hülya (2003), Kurtuluş Savaşmda Bektaşi/er, Kitap Yay. İstanbul MELIKOFF, lrene (1994), Uyur İdik Uyardılar, (çev. Turan Alptekin) Cem Yay.stanbul. MELIKOFF, Irene (1998), Hacı Bektaş: Efsaneden Gerçeğe, (Çev. Turan Alptekin)Cumhuriyet Yay. İstanbul NOYAN, Bedri (?),"Bektaşi-Alevi Konusunda Bir Gezinti", Türk Yurdu, S.8, İstanbuls.34. NOYAN, Bedri (1998), Bütün Yönleriyle Bektaşilikve Alevilik, (hz!. Şakir Keçeli) C.l,Ardıç Yay. Ankara.