KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Forest Science / 2014 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

AFFORESTATION EFFECTS ON SOIL BIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES

A. Sepken BERBER
Shima FARASAT
Ayten NAMLI
Sayfa
25–34
Yayın Tarihi
2014-04-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A decrease in organic matter and an increase in phosphatase activity were determined with soil depth.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study afforestation effects on physical, chemical and biological soil properties were investigated in 10 and 23 years old black pine plantations used as grassland previously versus bear area.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The results were also evaluated in terms of different landscape positions and soil dephts.Afforestration increased electrical conductivity and soil microbial respiration in 23 year old plantation; and decreased organic matter and β-glucosidase activity in both of 23 and 10 years old plantations.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A decrease in organic matter and an increase in phosphatase activity were determined with soil depth.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Afforestation · soil enzyme activity · microbial respiration.

Abstract

In this study afforestation effects on physical, chemical and biological soil properties were investigated in 10 and 23 years old black pine plantations used as grassland previously versus bear area. The results were also evaluated in terms of different landscape positions and soil dephts.Afforestration increased electrical conductivity and soil microbial respiration in 23 year old plantation; and decreased organic matter and β-glucosidase activity in both of 23 and 10 years old plantations. There was no significant difference in phosphatase activity. Soil reaction, total carbonates, organic matter, β-glucosidase and CO2 evaluation were affected from different landscape positions. It is founded that carbonate, pH, and microbial respiration were higher in the south-facing slopes than those of north-facing slopes were; organic matter and β-glucosidase activity were higher in the north-facing slopes. A decrease in organic matter and an increase in phosphatase activity were determined with soil depth.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BERBER, A. S., FARASAT, S., NAMLI, A. (2014). AFFORESTATION EFFECTS ON SOIL BIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 25–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/665155

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. References Acosta-Martı´nez V, Tabatabai MA (2000) Enzyme activities in a limed agricultural soil. Biol Fertil Soils 31,85€“91 Alef, K. (1995). Soil respiration methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press,
  2. Inc.San Diego. Bandick AK, Dick RP (1999) Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol Biochem 31,1471€“1479 Bond-Lamberty, B., Thomson, A. (2010). A global database of soil respiration data. Biogeosciences 7, 1915-1926. Bossio1 D.A., Girvan M.S., Verchot L., Bullimore J., Borelli T., Albrecht A., Scow K.M., Ball A.S., Pretty J.N. and Osborn A.M. (2005). Soil Microbial Community Response to Land Use Change in an Agricultural Landscape of Western Kenya. Microbial Ecology 49, 50€“62 Chodak M., NikliÅ„ska M. (2010). The effect of different tree species on the chemical and microbial properties of reclaimed mine soils. Biol Fertil Soils, 46, 555€“566 Chunderova, A.I. and Zubets, T. (1969). Phosphatase activity in dernopodzolic soils. Pochvovedeniye 11, 47-53.
  3. Das S.K.and Varma A. (2011). Role of Enzymes in Maintaining Soil Health. In: Varma A., Shukla G. (ed) Soil Biology Soil Enzymology Springer Nodia, India 22, 25-42
  4. Dick RP, Breakwell DP, Turco RF (1996) Soil enzyme activities and biodiversity measurements as integrative microbiological indicators. In: Doran JW, Jones AJ (eds) Methods of assessing soil quality. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 247€“271 Dick, W.A. ve Tabatabai, M.A. (1993). Significance and potential uses of soil enzymes. In: F. Blaine (Editor), Soil Microbial Ecology. Application in Agricultural and Enviromental Management, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 95-127.
  5. Dick WA, Cheng L, Wang P (2000) Soil acid and alkaline phosphatase activity as pH adjustment indicators. Soil Biol Biochem 32, 1915€“1919
  6. Doran, JW, Zeiss, MR (2000) Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 15, 3€“11 Eivazi, F. And Tabatabai, M.A. (1977). Phospahatases in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 9, 167-172.
  7. Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA (1988) Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 20, 601€“606 Esen A (1993) b-glucosidases: overview. In: Esen A (ed) β-glucosidases and molecular biology. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 9€“17 Frank, A.B. (2002). Carbon dioxide fluxes over a grazed prairie and seeded pasture in the Northern Large Plains. Environmental Pollution 116, 397-403.
  8. Ganeshamurthy AM, Singh G, Singh NT (1995) Sulphur status a