Dergiler / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Determination of the Relationship between Rice Suitability Classes and Satellite Images with Different Time Series for Yeşil Küre Farm Lands

Sayfa
507–526
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In particular, it was determined that August received the highest r2 value (NDVI; 0.8580 and RE-OSAVI; 0.8465) in both vegetation index models at the S1 level, and on the other hand, a higher r2 value was obtained with NDVI.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, rice land designated for agricultural land suitability indices belonging to the enterprise Yeşil Küre Farm Land with different time series Sentinel-2A satellite images calculated utilizing spectral vegetation index, which are Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and Red Edge Optimized Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index values by statistical comparison of the relationship between rice for monitoring and estimation of potential productivity is presented a different perspective.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Firstly, according to the rice suitability assessment for the study area, the area of 5488.9 ha was determined to be suitable for rice cultivation at the S1 and S2 levels, whereas the area of 588.9 ha was determined to be unsuitable.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In particular, it was determined that August received the highest r2 value (NDVI; 0.8580 and RE-OSAVI; 0.8465) in both vegetation index models at the S1 level, and on the other hand, a higher r2 value was obtained with NDVI.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Land evaluation · NDVI · RE-OSAVI

Abstract

In this study, rice land designated for agricultural land suitability indices belonging to the enterprise Yeşil Küre Farm Land with different time series Sentinel-2A satellite images calculated utilizing spectral vegetation index, which are Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and Red Edge Optimized Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index values by statistical comparison of the relationship between rice for monitoring and estimation of potential productivity is presented a different perspective. Firstly, according to the rice suitability assessment for the study area, the area of 5488.9 ha was determined to be suitable for rice cultivation at the S1 and S2 levels, whereas the area of 588.9 ha was determined to be unsuitable. In this study, it was determined that the most successful results for each land conformity class were obtained using the NDVI. In particular, it was determined that August received the highest r2 value (NDVI; 0.8580 and RE-OSAVI; 0.8465) in both vegetation index models at the S1 level, and on the other hand, a higher r2 value was obtained with NDVI.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DENGİZ, O., DEDEOĞLU, M., KAYA, N. S. (2022). Determination of the Relationship between Rice Suitability Classes and Satellite Images with Different Time Series for Yeşil Küre Farm Lands. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 507–526. https://ajindex.com/articles/647844

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Ahmed, G. B., Shariff, A.R.M., Balasundram, S.K., & Fikri bin Abdullah, A. (2016). Agriculture land suitability analysis evaluation based multi criteria and GIS approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 37, 012044.
  2. Al-Bakri, J.T., & Suleiman, A.S. (2004). NDVI response to rainfall in different ecological zones in Jordan. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(19), 3897-3912.
  3. Askari, M.S., Cui, J., O’Rourke, S.M., & Holden, N.M. (2015). Evaluation of soil structural quality using VIS–NIR spectra. Soil and Tillage Research, 146, 108–117.
  4. Bagheri, N., Ahmadi, H., Alavipanah, S., & Omid, M. (2012). Soil-line vegetation indices for corn nitrogen content prediction. International Agrophysics, 26(2), 103–108.
  5. Barnes, E., Clarke, T., Richards, S., Colaizzi, P., Haberland, J., Kostrzewski, M., Waller, P., Choi, C., Riley, E., Thompson, T., Lascano, R. J., Li, H., & Moran, M.S. (2000). Coincident detection of crop water stress, nitrogen status and canopy density using ground based multispectral data. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Bloomington, MN, USA, 2000 (Vol. 1619). Blum, W.E.H. (2006). Soil Resources- The basis of human society and the environment. Bodenkultur 57, 197–202.
  6. Damian, J.M., Pias, O.H.D.C., Cherubin, M.R., Fonseca, A.Z.D., Fornari, E.Z., Santi, A.L., (2020). Applying the NDVI from satellite images in delimiting management zones for annual crops. Sci. Agric. 77 (1). Dedeoğlu, M., Başayiğit, L., Yüksel, M., & Kaya, F. (2020). Assessment of the vegetation indices on Sentinel-2A images for predicting the soil productivity potential in Bursa, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(1), 1-16.
  7. Dengiz, O. (2013). Land Suitability Assessment for Rice Cultivation Based on GIS Modeling. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 37: 326-334, DOI: 10.3906/tar-1204-36.
  8. Dengiz, O., & Sağlam, M. (2012). Determination of land productivity index based on parametric approach using GIS technique. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 1, 51–57.
  9. Doran, J.W., & Parkin, T.B. (1994). Defining and assessing soil quality. Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment, 35, 1-21.
  10. Dumanski, J., & Peiretti, R. (2013). Modern concepts of soil conservation. International soil and water conservation research, 1(1), 19-23.
  11. Explorer, E. (2000). FS; 083-00; Geological Survey (US). Earth observatory NASA. http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/MeasuringVegetation. ESRI, (2010). ArcGIS user’