Dergiler / Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 33

AİLE VE SOSYAL POLİTİKALAR BAKANLIĞI SOSYAL VE EKONOMİK DESTEK HİZMETLERİNİN ANALİZİ

AN ANALYSIS OF THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SUPPORT SERVICES OF THE MINISTRY OF FAMILY AND SOCIAL POLICIES IN TURKEY

Sayfa
1996–2016
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, it is believed that the current practicecentralizes the family while not considering the women’s burden of care.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:One of the social policy implementations in Turkey affected by the globalization process and neo-liberal politics is Social and Economic Support (SED) services.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It is provided by the GeneralDirectorate of Child Services of the Ministry of Family and Social Policy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, it is believed that the current practicecentralizes the family while not considering the women’s burden of care.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

One of the social policy implementations in Turkey affected by the globalization process and neo-liberal politics is Social and Economic Support (SED) services. It is provided by the GeneralDirectorate of Child Services of the Ministry of Family and Social Policy. SED services are providedfor children who do not need institutional care as long as they are supported. SED services aredirectly linked to the poverty-based child protection services. The main objective of this study isto address the SED services, one of the social policy implementations for the prevention of childpoverty, to present the current situation and deficiencies. In this study, data related to SEDservices will be discussed in terms of neo-liberal policies. In addition; the number of aid recipientswithin years and their share in GDP will be discussed. In conclusion, in addition to significantpositive contributions, SED services appear to have significant shortcomings. In particular, thenon-systematic and non-comprehensive implementations of follow-up and monitoring processes,lack of social and psychological support services are outstanding problems. These aspects are ofgreat importance in terms of providing relief from the welfare dependency of the service.Moreover, with the influence of neo-liberalism, social welfare responsibilities of the state aretransferred to other institutions (traditional charitable organizations, NGOs, voluntaryorganizations, etc.) to a certain extent. In addition, it is believed that the current practicecentralizes the family while not considering the women’s burden of care.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOLGÜN, C., AYALP, M. Ç., AYGÜLER, E. (2022). AİLE VE SOSYAL POLİTİKALAR BAKANLIĞI SOSYAL VE EKONOMİK DESTEK HİZMETLERİNİN ANALİZİ. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 33, 1996–2016. https://ajindex.com/articles/644568

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Abacı, B. (2012). The effects of neoliberal politics on development in the process of globalization: Case of Turkey. (Master Thesis) Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
  2. ASPB. (2017). 2016 annual report. Ankara.
  3. Bauman, Z. (2016). Globalization: The Human Consequences (A. Yılmaz, Trans. Vol. 6). İstanbul:
  4. Ayrıntı Publishing. Buğra, A. (2001). Ekonomik kriz karşısında Türkiye’nin geleneksel refah rejimi. Society and Science, 89, 22-30.
  5. Chomsky, N. (2014). Profit over People: Neoliberalism and Global Order (S. Evren, Trans.). İstanbul:
  6. Everest Publishing. Çelik, A. (2010). New Conservative Social Policy Tendency on Turkey: Aid and Philanthropy Rather Than Social Right and Public Responsibility. İ. Journal of Political Sciences of Istanbul University, 42, 63-81.
  7. ÇHGM. (2017). 2017 bulletin. Ankara.
  8. Erdoğan, M. (2014). Assessment of Social and Economic Support Services Project: Research Result Report. Ankara: Ministry of Family and Social Policy General Directorate Child Services. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. New York: Polity Press.
  9. Esping-Andersen, G. (2015). Toplumsal riskler ve refah devletleri (B. Yakut-Çakar & U. B. Balaban, Trans.). In A. Buğra & Ç. Keyder (Eds.), Sosyal Politika Yazıları (7. Baskı:33-52). İstanbul:
  10. İletişim Yayınları.
  11. EUROSTAT. (2016). EU Children at Risk of Poverty and Social Exclusion Statistic. European Statistic Institute. EUROSTAT. (2018). Population Structure Statistic. European Statistic Institute. Günal:(2010). Avrupa Birliğinin Güney Avrupa sosyal devletine etkisi: İspanya Örneği. Journal of Assistance and Solidarity, 1(1), 81-96.
  12. Kleinman, M. (2015). Kriz mi? Ne krizi? Avrupa refah devletlerinde süreklilik ve değişim (B. Yakut-Çakar & U. B. Balaban, Trans.). In A. Buğra & Ç. Keyder (Eds.), Sosyal politika yazıları (7. Baskı:159-194). İstanbul:
  13. İletişim Yayınları.
  14. Koçal, A. V. (2014). Bir Sosyal Politika ve Siyasal Meşrutiyet Aracı Olarak 'Hayırseverlik' Türkiye’de Sivil Yardım Organizasyonlarının Politik Ekonomisi ve Siyasal İşlevi Sosyal insan Hakları Ulusal Sempozyomu VI Bildirileri Kitabı (Vol. 119:211-225). İstanbul:
  15. Petrol İş Yayını. Kuştepeli, Y., & Halaç, U. (2004). Analysis and improvement of the overall income distribution in Turkey. Dokuz Eylul University The Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 6(4), 143-160.
  16. OECD. (2016). OECD Income Distribution Database (IDD): Gini, poverty, income, Methods and Concepts. Okur, A., Soylu, N., & Aslan, E. (2016). Sosyal ve Ekonomik Des