KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8

A novel reduction support frame for management of unstable tibial fractures with intramedullary nail: Preliminary report

İbrahim Deniz Canbeyli
Meric Cirpar
Caner Baysan
Birhan Oktas
Furkan Soy
Sayfa
1134–1141
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

CONCLUSION: TORS frame is a simple and cheap technique and should be considered as reduction support in the management of UTF by intramedullary nailing.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:BACKGROUND: Management of unstable tibial fractures (UTF) can be challenging due to widening of the proximal and distal metaphyseal zone, soft tissue problems, and poor vascularity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:METHODS: A total of 65 patients who were admitted with UTF and underwent intramedullary nailing were assessed; 43 patients un- derwent manual traction technique, and 22 patients underwent TORS technique.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:CONCLUSION: TORS frame is a simple and cheap technique and should be considered as reduction support in the management of UTF by intramedullary nailing.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of unstable tibial fractures (UTF) can be challenging due to widening of the proximal and distal metaphyseal zone, soft tissue problems, and poor vascularity. We aimed to compare the effect of novel tibial orthopedic reduction support (TORS) frame constructed by re-used tubular external fixator systems and manual traction with regard to the quality of re- duction, and fracture healing. METHODS: A total of 65 patients who were admitted with UTF and underwent intramedullary nailing were assessed; 43 patients un- derwent manual traction technique, and 22 patients underwent TORS technique. The sagittal and coronal plane angulations were eval- uated in initial postoperative radiographs, and radiologic union scores for tibial fractures (RUST) were compared at follow-up X-rays. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 43.49±19.09 years in the manual-traction group and 43.41±16.8 years in the TORS group. The mean coronal plane angulation was 1.84±3.16 in the manual traction group and 1.86±4.21 in the TORS group. The mean sagittal plane angulation was 1.19±1.93 in manual traction group and 0.32±0.65 in the TORS group. The number of coronal and sagittal plane angulations >5° was higher in manual traction group than TORS group. The mean RUST was significantly higher in the TORS group than in the manual traction group at 6th, 9th, and 12th-month controls. The union rates were also higher in the TORS group at 9th and 12th-month controls. CONCLUSION: TORS frame is a simple and cheap technique and should be considered as reduction support in the management of UTF by intramedullary nailing.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Canbeyli, İ. D., Cirpar, M., Baysan, C., Oktas, B., Soy, F. (2022). A novel reduction support frame for management of unstable tibial fractures with intramedullary nail: Preliminary report. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8, 1134–1141. https://ajindex.com/articles/644399

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Dong WW, Shi ZY, Liu ZX, Mao HJ. Indirect reduction technique us- ing a distraction support in minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteo- synthesis of tibial shaft fractures. Chin J Traumatol 2016;19:348−52
  2. Borrelli J, Prickett W, Song E, Becker D, Ricci W. Extraosseous blood supply of the tibia and the effects of different plating techniques: A hu- man cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:691−5
  3. Attal R, Hansen M, Kirjavainen M, Bail H, Hammer TO, Rosenberger R, et al. A multicentre case series of tibia fractures treated with the expert tibia nail (ETN). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012;132:975−84
  4. Beazley JC, Hull P. Temporary intra-operative reduction tech- niques for tibial fracture fixation: A review of the literature. Injury 2010;41:1228−33
  5. Lawyer RB, Jr, Lubbers LM. Use of the hoffmann apparatus in the treat- ment of unstable tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:1264−73
  6. Green SA. Complications of external skeletal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;180:109−16
  7. Egger EL, Gottsauner-Wolf F, Palmer J, Aro HT, Chao EY. Effects of axial dynamization on bone healing. J Trauma 1993;34:185−92
  8. Meena RC, Meena UK, Gupta GL, Gahlot N, Gaba S. Intramedullary nailing versus proximal plating in the management of closed extra-ar- ticular proximal tibial fracture: A randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Traumatol 2015;16:203−8
  9. Bhat R, Wani MM, Rashid S, Akhter N. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for closed distal tibial fractures: A consecutive study based on 25 patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015;25:563−8
  10. Polat A, Kose O, Canbora K, Yanık S, Guler F. Intramedullary nailing versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal extra-articular tibial fractures: A prospective randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sci 2015;20:695−701
  11. Moorcroft CI, Thomas PB, Ogrodnik PJ, Verborg SA. A device for im- proved reduction of tibial fractures treated with external fixation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2000;214:449−57
  12. Ehlinger M, Adam P, Bonnomet F. Minimally invasive locking screw plate fixation of non-articular proximal and distal tibia fractures. Orthop Trau- matol Surg Res 2010;96:800−9
  13. McKee MD, Schemitsch EH, Waddell JP, Yoo D. A prospective, random- ized clinical trial comparing tibial nailing using fracture table traction ver- sus manual traction. J Orthop Trauma 1999;13:463−9
  14. Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and dislocation classification compend