Dergiler / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?

Sayfa
315–319
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

RESULTS: The mFI-5 was observed to be effective in the prediction of the complications of hospital re-admission, wound site infec- tion, life-threatening medical complications, and the presence of any complication (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:BACKGROUND: The 5-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5), which is the latest version of the Frailty Index, is a tool that calculates the risk of complications after treatment by scoring the comorbidity status of the patient.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the mFI-5 in predicting complications in geriatric patients with an ankle fracture.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:RESULTS: The mFI-5 was observed to be effective in the prediction of the complications of hospital re-admission, wound site infec- tion, life-threatening medical complications, and the presence of any complication (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 5-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5), which is the latest version of the Frailty Index, is a tool that calculates the risk of complications after treatment by scoring the comorbidity status of the patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the mFI-5 in predicting complications in geriatric patients with an ankle fracture. METHODS: A retrospective examination was made of a total of 94 patients aged >65 years who were treated for an ankle fracture in our hospital between 2015 and 2020. Weber type A, B, and C fractures were included in the study. For each patient, the mFI-5 was calculated for the comorbidity status of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension requiring drugs, and non-independent functional status. Multivariance logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the mFI-5 points as a predictor of negative outcomes. RESULTS: The mFI-5 was observed to be effective in the prediction of the complications of hospital re-admission, wound site infec- tion, life-threatening medical complications, and the presence of any complication (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Aktı, S., Zeybek, H. (2022). Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 315–319. https://ajindex.com/articles/643978

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Jin K, Simpkins JW, Ji X, Leis M, Stambler I. The critical need to pro- mote research of aging and aging-related diseases to improve health and longevity of the elderly population. Aging Dis 2014;6:1–5
  2. Kadakia RJ, Ahearn BM, Schwartz AM, Tenenbaum S, Bariteau JT. An- kle fractures in the elderly: Risks and management challenges. Orthop Res Rev 2017;9:45–50
  3. Gauthé R, Desseaux A, Rony L, Tarissi N, Dujardin F. Ankle fractures in the elderly: Treatment and results in 477 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016;102:S241–4
  4. Grütter R, Cordey J, Wahl D, Koller B, Regazzoni P. A biomechanical enigma: Why are tibial fractures not more frequent in the elderly? Injury 2000;31:C72–7
  5. Guggenbuhl P, Meadeb J, Chalès G. Osteoporotic fractures of the proxi- mal humerus, pelvis, and ankle: Epidemiology and diagnosis. Joint Bone Spine 2005;72:372–5
  6. Strauss EJ, Egol KA. The management of ankle fractures in the elderly. Injury 2007;38:S2–9
  7. Lott A, Egol KA, Lyon T, Konda SR. Ability of a risk prediction tool to stratify quality and cost for older patients with operative ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2019;33:312–7
  8. Makwana NK, Bhowal B, Harper WM, Hui AW. Conservative ver- sus operative treatment for displaced ankle fractures in patients over 55 years of age. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:525–9
  9. Bariteau JT, Hsu RY, Mor V, Lee Y, DiGiovanni CW, Hayda R. Opera- tive versus nonoperative treatment of geriatric ankle fractures: A medi- care part A claims database analysis. Foot Ankle Int 2015;36:648–55
  10. Aigner R, Salomia C, Lechler P, Pahl R, Frink M. Relationship of pro- longed operative time and comorbidities with complications after geriat- ric ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 2017;38:41–8
  11. Simske NM, Benedick A, Kavanagh MD, Vallier HA. Predicting length of stay and readmissions after an ankle fracture using a risk stratification tool (STTGMA). J Orthop Trauma 2020;34:e407–13
  12. Fu MC, Ondeck NT, Nwachukwu BU, Garcia GH, Gulotta LV, Verma NN, et al. What associations exist between comorbidity indices and post- operative adverse events after total shoulder arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019;477:881–90
  13. Velanovich V, Antoine H, Swartz A, Peters D, Rubinfeld I. Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: Its application to a national database. J Surg Res 2013;183:104–10
  14. Subramaniam S, Aalberg JJ, Soriano RP, Divino CM. New 5-factor mod- ified frailty in