Dergiler / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 7

The use of routine laboratory testing in acute trauma care: A retrospective analysis

Sayfa
954–959
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These findings suggest reconsiderations and more accuracy in the performance of laboratory testing, especially for trauma patients with stable vital signs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:BACKGROUND: In more than 60 countries worldwide, laboratory testing plays a challenging and expensive role in trauma resus citation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In 1995, the literature already suggested that routine laboratory testing may not be useful for most trauma patients.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These findings suggest reconsiderations and more accuracy in the performance of laboratory testing, especially for trauma patients with stable vital signs.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In more than 60 countries worldwide, laboratory testing plays a challenging and expensive role in trauma resus citation. In 1995, the literature already suggested that routine laboratory testing may not be useful for most trauma patients. Our study hypothesized that still the need for some laboratory tests perhaps should be reconsidered. Therefore, the aim of this study was to create more insight in the distribution between normal and abnormal parameters for routine laboratory testing in trauma patient management. METHODS: This retrospective analysis was performed at Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, an academic level 1 trauma center. Data concerning age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical state classification system (ASA), Injury Severity Scores, Glasgow Coma Scales, mechanism of injury, presence of high-energy trauma, and type of injury (blunt or penetrating) were obtained. Laboratory parameters included comprehensive hematology, coagulation, arterial blood gas, kidney, and liver blood panels. Analytical focus was paid to the patient’s vital status, the indication for an emergency intervention, and the risk of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1287 patients were included in the study. Patients with unstable vital signs or who required emergency inter vention were most often dealing with abnormalities in pO2 , glucose, D-dimer, creatinine, and alcohol values. Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), international normalized ratio (INR), fibrinogen, and amylase were obtained in more than 80% of the patients, but in specific patient groups only abnormal in less than 9%. CONCLUSION: Trauma patients suffer mainly from abnormal values of D-dimer, pO2 , glucose, creatinine, and alcohol. By contrast, MCV, INR, amylase, fibrinogen, and thrombocytes are regularly obtained as well, but only abnormal in a small amount of trauma patients. These findings suggest reconsiderations and more accuracy in the performance of laboratory testing, especially for trauma patients with stable vital signs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

POPAL, Z., SCHEPERS, T., SCHIE, P. V., GIANNAKOPOULOS, G. F., HALM, J. A. (2022). The use of routine laboratory testing in acute trauma care: A retrospective analysis. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 7, 954–959. https://ajindex.com/articles/643955

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Chandler WL, Ferrell C, Trimble S, Moody S. Development of a rapid emergency hemorrhage panel. Transfusion 2010;50:2547–52
  2. Callum JL, Rizoli S, Pendergrast J. Rapid laboratory testing for trauma patients: Where a perfect result may not be in the best interests of the patient. Transfusion 2010;50:2529–32
  3. Hill AG, Hill GL. Metabolic response to severe injury. Br J Surg 1998;85:884–90
  4. Moore FA, Sauaia A, Moore EE, Haenel JB, Burch JM, Lezotte DC. Postinjury multiple organ failure: A bimodal phenomenon. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 1996;40:501–10
  5. Nast-Kolb D, Waydhas C, Gippner-Steppert C, Schneider I, Trupka A, Ruchholtz S, et al. Indicators of the posttraumatic inflammatory response correlate with organ failure in patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 1997;42:446–54
  6. Trisorio Liuzzi MP, Attolini E, Quaranta R, Paparella D, Cappabianca G, Di Serio F, et al. Laboratory request appropriateness in emergency: Impact on hospital organization. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:760–4
  7. Chu UB, Clevenger FW, Imami ER, Lampard SD, Frykberg ER, Tepas JJ. The impact of selective laboratory evaluation on utilization of labo ratory resources and patient care in a level-I trauma center. Am J Surg 1996;172:558–62
  8. Alonso-Cerezo MC, Martín JS, Montes MA, De La Iglesia VM. Ap propriate utilization of clinical laboratory tests. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1461–5
  9. Tortella BJ, Lavery RF, Rekant M. Utility of routine admission serum chemistry panels in adult trauma patients. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:190–4
  10. Namias N, McKenney MG, Martin LC. Utility of admission chemistry and coagulation profiles in trauma patients: A reappraisal of traditional practice. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 1996;41:21–5
  11. Tasse JL, Janzen ML, Ahmed NA, Chung RS. Screening laboratory and radiology panels for trauma patients have low utility and are not cost ef fective. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 2008;65:1114–6
  12. Duggan S, Tillotson L, McCann P. Routine laboratory tests in adult trau ma: Are they necessary? Bull R Coll Surg Engl 2011;93:266–72
  13. Köksal Ö, Eren Çevik Ş, Akköse Aydin Ş, Özdemir F. Acil servise başvu ran travma hastalarinda rutin testlerin gerekliliğinin analizi. Ulus Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Derg 2012;18:23–30
  14. Jacobs IA, Kelly K, Valenziano C, Chevinsky AH, Pawar J, Jones C. Cost savings associated with changes in routine laboratory tests ordered for victims of trauma. Am Surg 2000;66:579–84
  15. Munro J, Booth A, Nicholl J. Routi