Dergiler / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Use of deep learning methods for hand fracture detection from plain hand radiographs

Sayfa
196–201
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This CAD method can assist physicians working in the emergency departments of small hospitals when interpreting hand radiographs, especially when it is difficult to reach qualified colleagues, such as night shifts and weekends.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:BACKGROUND: Patients with hand trauma are usually examined in emergency departments of hospitals.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:There were 275 fractured wrists, 257 fractured phalanx, and 270 normal hand radiographs in the raw dataset.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This CAD method can assist physicians working in the emergency departments of small hospitals when interpreting hand radiographs, especially when it is difficult to reach qualified colleagues, such as night shifts and weekends.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with hand trauma are usually examined in emergency departments of hospitals. Hand fractures are fre quently observed in patients with hand trauma. Here, we aim to develop a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) method to assist physi cians in the diagnosis of hand fractures using deep learning methods. METHODS: In this study, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) were used and the transfer learning method was applied. There were 275 fractured wrists, 257 fractured phalanx, and 270 normal hand radiographs in the raw dataset. CNN, a deep learning method, were used in this study. In order to increase the performance of the model, transfer learning was applied with the pre-trained VGG-16, GoogLeNet, and ResNet-50 networks. RESULTS: The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision results in Group 1 (wrist fracture and normal hand) dataset were 93.3%, 96.8%, 90.3%, and 89.7% , respectively, with VGG-16, were 88.9%, 94.9%, 84.2%, and 82.4%, respectively, with Resnet-50, and were 88.1%, 90.6%, 85.9%, and 85.3%, respectively, with GoogLeNet. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision results in Group 2 (phalanx fracture and normal hand) dataset were 84.0%, 84.1%, 83.8%, and 82.8%, respectively, with VGG-16, were 79.4%, 78.5%, 80.3%, and 79.7%, respectively, with Resnet-50, and were 81.7%, 81.3%, 82.1%, and 81.3%, respectively, with GoogLeNet. CONCLUSION: We achieved promising results in this CAD method, which we developed by applying methods such as transfer learning, data augmentation, which are state-of-the-art practices in deep learning applications. This CAD method can assist physicians working in the emergency departments of small hospitals when interpreting hand radiographs, especially when it is difficult to reach qualified colleagues, such as night shifts and weekends.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÜRETEN, K., SEVİNÇ, H. F., İĞDELİ, U., ONAY, A., MARAŞ, Y. (2022). Use of deep learning methods for hand fracture detection from plain hand radiographs. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 196–201. https://ajindex.com/articles/643953

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg 2001;26:908–15
  2. Christie BM, Michelotti BF. Fractures of the carpal bones. Clin Plast Surg 2019;46:469–77
  3. Bernstein ML, Chung KC. Hand fractures and their management: An international view. Injury 2006;37:1043–8
  4. Yahalomi E, Chernofsky M, Werman M. Detection of distal radius fractures trained by a small set of X-ray images and faster R-CNN. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2019. p. 971–81
  5. Er E, Kara PH, Oyar O, Ünlüer EE. Overlooked extremity fractures in the emergency. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2013;19:25–8
  6. Lindsey R, Daluiski A, Chopra S, Lachapelle A, Mozer M, Sicular S, et al. Deep neural network improves fracture detection by clinicians. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115:11591–6
  7. Rawat W, Wang Z. Deep convolutional neural networks for image classi fication: A comprehensive review. Neural Comput 2017;29:2352–449
  8. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. In: Advances in Neural Informa tion Processing Systems; 2012
  9. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, et al. Going deeper with convolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Com puter Society; 2015. p. 1–9
  10. Szegedy C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, Shlens J, Wojna Z. Rethinking the In ception Architecture for Computer Vision. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog nition. IEEE Computer Society; 2016. p. 2818–26
  11. Iandola FN, Han S, Moskewicz MW, Ashraf K, Dally WJ, Keutzer K. SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level Accuracy with 50x Fewer Parameters and 12. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recog nition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society; 2016. p. 770–8
  12. Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep Convolutional Networks for Large-scale Image Recognition. 3rd International Conference on Learn ing Representations, ICLR 2015-Conference Track Proceedings; 2015. p. 1–14
  13. Anwar SM, Majid M, Qayyum A, Awais M, Alnowami M, Khan MK. Medical image analysis using convolutional neural networks: A review. J Med Syst 2018;42:226
  14. Setio AA, Ciompi F, Litjens G, Gerke P, Jacobs C, Van Riel SJ, et al. Pulmonary nodu