Dergiler / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 7

Predictive evaluation of SIRI, SII, PNI, and GPS in cholecystostomy application in patients with acute cholecystitis

Sayfa
940–946
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The PNI and SII were calculated RESULTS: There is significant difference between the two groups by the comparison of SIRI, SII, PNI, and GPS values (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical significance of systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), systemic inflammation index (SII), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) in deciding whether to perform cholecystostomy when determining if cholecystostomy is the right choice for acute cholecystitis (AC) patients.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:METHODS: Between January 2018 and December 2020, 126 consecutive patients with AC with and without cholecystostomy were retrospectively recruited from the Trakya University in Edirne, Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The PNI and SII were calculated RESULTS: There is significant difference between the two groups by the comparison of SIRI, SII, PNI, and GPS values (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical significance of systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), systemic inflammation index (SII), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) in deciding whether to perform cholecystostomy when determining if cholecystostomy is the right choice for acute cholecystitis (AC) patients. METHODS: Between January 2018 and December 2020, 126 consecutive patients with AC with and without cholecystostomy were retrospectively recruited from the Trakya University in Edirne, Turkey. Group I included AC patients with cholecystostomy and Group II included AC patients without cholecystostomy. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) were calculated. The PNI and SII were calculated RESULTS: There is significant difference between the two groups by the comparison of SIRI, SII, PNI, and GPS values (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CAKCAK, İ. E., KULA, O. (2022). Predictive evaluation of SIRI, SII, PNI, and GPS in cholecystostomy application in patients with acute cholecystitis. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 7, 940–946. https://ajindex.com/articles/643945

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Csikesz N, Ricciardi R, Tseng JF, Shah SA. Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States. World J Surg 2008;32:2230–6
  2. Akyurek N, Salman B, Yuksel O, Tezcaner T, Irkorucu O, Yucel C, et al. Management of acute calculous cholecystitis in high-risk patients: Percu taneous cholecystotomy followed by early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2005;15:315–20
  3. Kortram K, van Ramshorst B, Bollen TL, Besselink MG, Gouma DJ, Karsten T, et al. Acute cholecystitis in high risk surgical patients: Percu taneous cholecystostomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CHOC OLATE trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012;13:7
  4. Spira RM, Nissan A, Zamir O, Cohen T, Fields SI, Freund HR. Percu taneous transhepatic cholecystostomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecys tectomy in critically ill patients with acute calculus cholecystitis. Am J Surg 2002;183:62–6
  5. Mayumi T, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Yoshida M, Sekimoto M, et al. Results of the Tokyo consensus meeting Tokyo guidelines. J Hepa tobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007;14:114–21
  6. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Mayumi T, Gomi H, et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013;20:35–46
  7. Barak O, Elazary R, Appelbaum L, Rivkind A, Almogy G. Conservative treatment for acute cholecystitis: Clinical and radiographic predictors of failure. Isr Med Assoc J 2009;11:739–43
  8. Gu L, Li H, Gao Y, Ma X, Chen L, Li X, et al. The association of platelet count with clinicopathological significance and prognosis in re nal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0125538
  9. Roxburgh CS, McMillan DC. Role of systemic inflammatory response in predicting survival in patients with primary operable cancer. Future Oncol 2010;6:149–63
  10. Pichler M, Hutterer GC, Stoeckigt C, Chromecki TF, Stojakovic T, Gol beck S, et al. Validation of the pre-treatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in a large European cohort of renal cell carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer 2013;108:901–7
  11. Fox P, Hudson M, Brown C, Lord S, Gebski V, De Souza P, et al. Markers of systemic inflammation predict survival in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Br J Cancer 2013;109:147–53
  12. Chang Y, An H, Xu L, Zhu Y, Yang Y, Lin Z, et al. Systemic inflammation score predicts postoperative prognosis of patients with clear-cell