Dergiler / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Determining The Feed Value, Feed Quality, and in Vitro Fermentation Properties of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) Harvested in Different Periods

Sayfa
542–548
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, determining the digestibility of plants via the measurement of RFV, RFQ, digestion parameters, and gas production in different harvest periods provided insights into the potential of Italian ryegrass as a feed material.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to determine the chemical content, in vitro gas and methane production, relative feed value (RFV), relative feed quality (RFQ), in vitro digestibility parameters, and microbial protein production of the Italian ryegrass plants harvested in different periods of the 2020 production season in Erzincan.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It was found that there were significant differences between the Italian ryegrass plants harvested in different periods in terms of composition, RFV, RFQ, and in vitro digestibility and fermentation parameters.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, determining the digestibility of plants via the measurement of RFV, RFQ, digestion parameters, and gas production in different harvest periods provided insights into the potential of Italian ryegrass as a feed material.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the chemical content, in vitro gas and methane production, relative feed value (RFV), relative feed quality (RFQ), in vitro digestibility parameters, and microbial protein production of the Italian ryegrass plants harvested in different periods of the 2020 production season in Erzincan. In this study an ANKOM Daisy Incubator was used to determine the in vitro digestibility parameters. In vitro gas production technique was used todetermine gas production and predicted parameters. It was found that there were significant differences between the Italian ryegrass plants harvested in different periods in terms of composition, RFV, RFQ, and in vitro digestibility and fermentation parameters. The RFV, metabolizable energy (ME), net energy (NE), true NDF digestibility (TNDFD), organic matter digestibility degree (OMDD), total digestible nutrient (TDN), dry matter intake (DMI), and RFQ values of the Italian ryegrass plants were found to be 247.32, 9.13, 5.68, 62.26%, 54.15%, 55.35%, 4.82%, and 215.81, respectively. On the other hand, after 24 hours of incubation it’s in vitro gas (GP), and methane production (ml and %), true dry matter digestibility (TDMD) values, partitioning factor (PF), microbial protein (MP), microbial protein synthesis efficiency (MPSE), and true digestibility (TD) were found to be 105.41, 17.35, 16.42, 281.72, 2.68, 57.68, 20.32, and 59.82, respectively. In conclusion, determining the digestibility of plants via the measurement of RFV, RFQ, digestion parameters, and gas production in different harvest periods provided insights into the potential of Italian ryegrass as a feed material.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gürsoy, E., Kaya, A., Sezmiş, G. (2022). Determining The Feed Value, Feed Quality, and in Vitro Fermentation Properties of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) Harvested in Different Periods. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 542–548. https://ajindex.com/articles/642582

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Alende M, Fluck AC, Volpı-Lagreca G, Andrae JG. 2020. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of annual ryegrass varieties grown in greenhouse conditions. RIA. Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, 46(1): 50-55. AOAC, 1998. Officinal methods of analysis. 16th ed., AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. Ayaşan T, Sucu E, Ülger İ, İnci H, Hızlı H, İnan S. 2021a. Determination of nutritional values of different tiger nut (Cyperus esculentes) types by using in vitro gas production technique. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 11(2): 1653-1663.
  2. Ayaşan T, Ulger İ, Cil AN, Tufarelli V, Laudadio V, Palangi V. 2021b. Estimation of chemical composition, in vitro gas production, metabolizable energy, net energy lactation values of different peanut varieties and line by Hohenheim in vitro gas production technique. Semina: Ciencias Agrarias, 42(2): 907-920. doi: 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p907 Bernard JK, West JW, Trammell S. 2002. Effect of replacing corn silage with annual ryegrass silage on nutrient digestibility, intake, and milk yield for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85(9): 2277-2282.
  3. Blümmel M, Steingas H, Becke K. 1997. The relationship between in vitro gas production, in vitro microbial biomass yield and N-15 incorporation and its implications for the prediction of voluntary feed intake of roughages. Brit J Nutr, 77: 911-921.
  4. Blümmel M, Lebzien P. 2001. Predicting ruminal microbial efficiencies of dairy rations by in vitro techniques. Liv Prod Sci, 68(2-3): 107-117. Boman RL. 2003. New forage analysis: Increased feed efficiency potential. USU Dairy Newsletter, 26: 3. Carlin A. 2006. Working paper: Global climate control: Is there a better strategy than reducing greenhouse gas emissions? p. 1-65.
  5. Cengiz T, Kamalak A. 2020. Farklı bölgelerde yetişen söğüt yapraklarının potansiyel besleme değerlerinin ve antimetanojenik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Derg., 23(5): 1351-1358. Cetinkaya AV. 2019. Comparison of anımal feeding method and relevant feeding ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) and animal plant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Master's thesis, Kirikkale University Health Sciences Institute, Kırıkkale. Fluck AC, Denardin OA, Junior JS, Rosa PP, Cardozo L, Scheibler RB, Rizzo FA, Junior HA. 2018. In vitro and in situ digestibility of annual ryegrass sılage from distinct phenological growth stages and predehydration times. Biosci. J., Uberlândia, 34(5): 1239-1247.
  6. Goel G, Makkar HPS, Becker K. 2008. Effect o