Dergiler / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Physicochemical Properties of Honey Produced at Different Altitudes

Sayfa
710–718
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study aims to determine the effect of altitude difference on the quantity and physicochemical structure of honey

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The types and densities of honeyed plants vary depending on the altitude.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Some of the minimum and maximum average values obtained as a result of the analysis of honey samples; moisture 14.70% and 18.60%, free acidity 20.50 meq/kg and 25.30 meq/kg, pH 3.20 and 4.30, EC 0.22 and 0.44 mS/cm, fructose 32% to 45%, glucose 0.10% to 0.18%, sucrose from 0.66% 1.80%, maltose ranged from 0.66% to 1.80%.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study aims to determine the effect of altitude difference on the quantity and physicochemical structure of honey
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The types and densities of honeyed plants vary depending on the altitude. This causes the amount and Physicochemical structure of honey produced in apiaries of different altitudes to change. In this study, honey harvest from the honeybee colonies placed at different altitudes in the same geographical region was carried out in the first week of September. Standard laboratory methods were used to determine some physicochemical properties of the honey samples. Some of the minimum and maximum average values obtained as a result of the analysis of honey samples; moisture 14.70% and 18.60%, free acidity 20.50 meq/kg and 25.30 meq/kg, pH 3.20 and 4.30, EC 0.22 and 0.44 mS/cm, fructose 32% to 45%, glucose 0.10% to 0.18%, sucrose from 0.66% 1.80%, maltose ranged from 0.66% to 1.80%. Also, HMF ranged from 1.80 mg/kg to 3.50 mg/kg, proline 530.00 mg/kg and 710.00 mg/kg, Density from 1.44 g/cm3 to 1.49 g/cm3, Invertase 20.30 U/kg- 28.50 U/kg, Diastase activity 13.23-19.07 and Total phenolic content ranged from 76.00-94.00 g. It has been determined that the physicochemical structures of honey produced at different heights are statistically different from each other. This study aims to determine the effect of altitude difference on the quantity and physicochemical structure of honey

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Erdoğan, Y., Turan, M. (2022). Physicochemical Properties of Honey Produced at Different Altitudes. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 710–718. https://ajindex.com/articles/642529

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Aazza S, Lyoussi B, Antunes D, Miguel MG. 2013. Physicochemical Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Commercial Portuguese Honeys. Journal of Food Science, 78: C1159-C1165. Akhtar S, Ali J, Javed B, Hassan S, Abbas S, Siddique M. 2014. Comparative Physiochemical Analysis of Imported and Locally Produced Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Honey. Global J Biotechnol Biochem, 9: 55-59. Anklam E. 1998. A Review of the Analytical Methods to Determine the Geographical and Botanical Origin of Honey. Food chemistry, 63: 549-562.
  2. Ashraf MW, Akram S. 2008. Physicochemical Characteristics and Heavy Metal Contents of Saudi Arabian Floral Honeys. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 17: 877-881.
  3. Azeredo LdC, Azeredo M, De Souza S, Dutra V. 2003. Protein Contents and Physicochemical Properties in Honey Samples of Apis Mellifera of Different Floral Origins. Food chemistry. Batu A, Küçük E, Çimen M. 2013. Doğu Anadolu Ve Doğu Karadeniz Bölgeleri Çiçek Ballarının Fizikokimyasal Ve Biyokimyasal Değerlerinin Belirlenmesi. Gıda Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 8: 52-62. Beekman M. 2005. How Long Will Honey Bees (Apis Mellifera L.) Be Stimulated by Scent to Revisit Past-Profitable Forage Sites? Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 191: 1115-1120.
  4. Belay A, Haki GD, Birringer M, Borck H, Lee Y-C, Kim K-T, Baye K, Melaku S. 2017.
  5. Enzyme Activity, Amino Acid Profiles and Hydroxymethylfurfural Content in Ethiopian Monofloral Honey. Journal of food science technology, 54: 2769-2778.
  6. Belitz H, Grosch W, Schieberle P. 1992. Lehrbuch Der Lebensmittelchemie Springer Verlag. Bogdanov S, Martin P, Lüllmann CJA. 1997. Harmonised Methods of the European Honey Commission. Bogdanov.S. 2009. Harmonized Methods of the International Honey Commission. International Honey Commission: 1–61.
  7. Boussaid A, Chouaibi M, Rezig L, Hellal R, Donsì F, Ferrari G, Hamdi S. 2018. Physicochemical and Bioactive Properties of Six Honey Samples from Various Floral Origins from Tunisia. Arabian journal of chemistry, 11: 265-274. CAC, 2001. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Revised codex standard for honey codex standard 12-1981, Codex Standard, 12: 1–7.
  8. Can Z, Yildiz O, Sahin H, Turumtay EA, Silici S, Kolayli S. 2015. An Investigation of Turkish Honeys: Their Physico-Chemical Properties, Antioxidant Capacities and Phenolic Profiles. Food chemistry, 180: 133-141.
  9. Carbonari V, Malaspina O, Alves VV, Polatto LP. 2016. Variation in Honey Yield Per Hive of Africanized Bees Depending on the Introducing Time of Young Queens. Ciência Ru