Dergiler / Türk Onkoloji Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

A Comparison between Breast-Conserving Surgery and Modified Radical Mastectomy Concerning the Female Sexual Function in Breast Cancer Patients under 50 Years of Age

Sayfa
26–30
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ourstudy demonstrates higher female sexual function in breast-conserving surgery patients, highlightingthe statistical difference of the arousal, orgasm and total scores of the Female Sexual Function Index,comparing with modified radical mastectomy patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVEThis study aims to compare the female sexual function in breast cancer patients, who have been administered breast-conserving surgery to the patients having undergone modified radical mastectomy.METHODSForty-four breast-conserving surgery and 27 modified radical mastectomy patients were included inthis study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Modified radicalmastectomy patients, who received breast reconstruction surgery afterwards, patients whom experienced local recurrence or distant organ metastases or patients over 50 years of age were excluded fromthis study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ourstudy demonstrates higher female sexual function in breast-conserving surgery patients, highlightingthe statistical difference of the arousal, orgasm and total scores of the Female Sexual Function Index,comparing with modified radical mastectomy patients.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

OBJECTIVEThis study aims to compare the female sexual function in breast cancer patients, who have been administered breast-conserving surgery to the patients having undergone modified radical mastectomy.METHODSForty-four breast-conserving surgery and 27 modified radical mastectomy patients were included inthis study. All patients completed chemotherapy and radiation therapy after surgery. Modified radicalmastectomy patients, who received breast reconstruction surgery afterwards, patients whom experienced local recurrence or distant organ metastases or patients over 50 years of age were excluded fromthis study. Each patient’s sexual function was evaluated using the Female Sexual Function Index, sixmonths after the completion of their treatment.RESULTSBetween breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy groups, no significant differenceof age, height, weight, and body mass index was observed. Although mean sexual desire (4,13 vs 3,97),arousal (3,72 vs 3,16), lubrication (3,76 vs 3,44), orgasm (3,90 vs 3,38), satisfaction (3,07 vs 2,50), pain(4,07 vs 3,82) and total scores (22,65 vs 20,27) were all higher in patients with breast-conserving surgery,only arousal, orgasm and total scores were significantly higher (p: 0,025, p:0,017 and p: 0,017, respectively).CONCLUSIONIn the treatment of breast cancer, the conservation of patients’ sexual function is an important issue. Ourstudy demonstrates higher female sexual function in breast-conserving surgery patients, highlightingthe statistical difference of the arousal, orgasm and total scores of the Female Sexual Function Index,comparing with modified radical mastectomy patients.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAKKAL, B. H., ELMAS, Ö., ÇAKMAK, G. K. (2022). A Comparison between Breast-Conserving Surgery and Modified Radical Mastectomy Concerning the Female Sexual Function in Breast Cancer Patients under 50 Years of Age. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 26–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/639125

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. American Cancer Society. Available from: http:// www.cancer.org/content/cancer/en/search.html?q=- cancer+death+rates. Accessed, Jan 25, 2019
  2. Galway K, Black A, Cantwell M, Cardwell CR, Mills M, Donnelly M. Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and emotional wellbeing for recently diagnosed cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD007064
  3. Akyolcu N. Sexual life after surgery in breast cancer. Eur J Breast Health 2008;4,77−83
  4. Öztürk D, Akyolcu N. Assessing sexual function and dysfunction in Turkish women undergoing surgical breast cancer treatment. Jpn J Nurs Sci 2016;13(2):220−8
  5. Gopie JP, ter Kuile MM, Timman R, Mureau MA, Tibben A. Impact of delayed implant and DIEP flap breast reconstruction on body image and sexual satisfaction: a prospective follow-up study. Psychooncology 2014;23(1):100−7
  6. Gahm J, Wickman M, Brandberg Y. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with inherited risk of breast cancer--prevalence of pain and discomfort, impact on sexuality, quality of life and feelings of regret two years after surgery. Breast 2010;19(6):462−9
  7. Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2008;27:32
  8. Avis NE, Crawford S, Manuel J. Psychosocial problems among younger women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2004;13(5):295−308
  9. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000;26(2):191−208. 10.Aygin D, Eti Aslan F. The Turkish adaptation of the female sexual function index. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2005;25(3):393−9. 11.Bartula I, Sherman KA. The Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI): evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity in women with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2015;23(9):2633−41. 12.Carter J, Stabile C, Seidel B, Baser RE, Gunn AR, Chi S, et al. Baseline characteristics and concerns of female cancer patients/survivors seeking treatment at a Female Sexual Medicine Program. Support Care Cancer 2015;23(8):2255−65. 13.Maiorino I, Chiodini P, Bellastella G, Giugliano D, Esposito K. Sexual dysfunction in women with cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies using the Female Sexual Function Index. Endocrine 2016;54(2):329−41. 14.Reich M, Lesur A, Perdrizet-Chevallier C. Depression, qua