Dergiler / Türk Onkoloji Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

Can A Dedicated Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Improve Personalized Medicine for Patients in Interventional Oncology? A Large Retrospective Single-Center Experience

Sayfa
192–199
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This approach reached optimal treat- ment results, with low adverse events, and reduced waiting, as well as hospitalization time.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE Interventional oncology (IO) offers minimal invasive oncological procedures to personalize therapeu- tic approaches.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:METHODS We retrospectively evaluated all patients managed at our institutional INTER-BOARD from January 2018 to June 2019.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This approach reached optimal treat- ment results, with low adverse events, and reduced waiting, as well as hospitalization time.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Interventional oncology (IO) offers minimal invasive oncological procedures to personalize therapeu- tic approaches. We aimed at assessing potential advantages of an IO multidisciplinary tumor board (INTER-BOARD) in terms of waiting time, procedural adverse events, and length of hospital stay. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated all patients managed at our institutional INTER-BOARD from January 2018 to June 2019. Outcome measurements such as number of patients managed in each semester, me- dian interval time between initial assessment and admission to the hospital, total number of procedures, procedures type, adverse events, and complication-related days of hospital stay were analyzed. RESULTS The INTER-BOARD discussed 438 patients (mean age 64 years; range 27-92) during the study period. Overall, 203 procedures were performed in patients >65 years and 49 in patients >80 years. The number of patients discussed progressively increased over time 82 (18.7%) during the first semester, 120 (27.4%) during the second semester, and 236 (54.1%) in the third semester. Patients with 33 different cancer types were discussed and 22 different procedure types were performed. Mean hospitalization time was 4 days (progressively decreasing over time from 5 to 3 days). Adverse events occurred in 4% of cases, with a progressively decreasing rate over time (16%, 5%, and 3% for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd semester, respectively). CONCLUSION In our experience, the dedicated INTER-BOARD allowed optimization of patient care through critical evaluation of all treatment options offered by different specialists. This approach reached optimal treat- ment results, with low adverse events, and reduced waiting, as well as hospitalization time.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

IEZZI, R., FIONDA, B., CORNACCHİONE, P., IEZZI, M., LANCELLOTTA, V., CONTEGIACOM, A., ATTILI, F., LARGHI, A., CELLINI, F., MARAZZI, F., COLLOCA, G., ROVIROSA, Á., KOVÁCS, G., GAMBACORTA, M. A., MANFREDI, R., VALENTIN, V., TAG, L. (2022). Can A Dedicated Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Improve Personalized Medicine for Patients in Interventional Oncology? A Large Retrospective Single-Center Experience. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 192–199. https://ajindex.com/articles/639046

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Tagliaferri L, Vavassori A, Lancellotta V, De Sanctis V, Barbera F, Fusco V, et al. Can brachytherapy be properly considered in the clinical practice? Trilogy project: The vision of the AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) Interventional Radiotherapy study group. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020;12(1):84–9
  2. Yanazume Y, Yanazume S, Iio K, Yonekura R, Ko- jima N, Uchida N, et al. Major causes of impractical brachytherapy in elderly patients with uterine cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40(6):1725–32
  3. Colloca G, Tagliaferri L, Capua BD, Gambacorta MA, Lanzotti V, Bellieni A, et al. Management of the elderly cancer patients complexity: the radiation oncology potential. Aging Dis 2020;11(3):649–57
  4. Kovacs G, Tagliaferri L, Lancellotta V, Kovacs A, Iezzi R, Gambarcorta MA, et al. Interventional oncology: should interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) be integrated into modern treatment procedures? Turk J Oncol 2019;34(Supp 1):16–22
  5. Kovács G, Tagliaferri L, Valentini V. Is an Interven- tional Oncology Center an advantage in the service of cancer patients or in the education? The Gemelli Hospital and INTERACTS experience. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017;9(6):497–8
  6. Bretschneider T, Ricke J, Gebauer B, Streitparth F. Image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy of ma- lignancies in various inner organs - technique, indi- cations, and perspectives. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2016;8(3):251–61
  7. Crocetti L, Iezzi R, Goldberg SN, Bilbao JI, Sami A, Akhan O, et al. The ten commandments of liver abla- tion: expert discussion and report from Mediterranean Interventional Oncology (MIOLive) congress 2017. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2018;22(12):3896–904
  8. Malagari K, Iezzi R, Goldberg SN, Bilbao JI, Sami A, Akhan O, et al. The ten commandments of chemoem- bolization: expert discussion and report from Mediter- ranean Interventional Oncology (MIOLive) congress 2017. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2018;22(2):372–81
  9. Bilbao JL, Iezzi R, Goldberg SN, Sami A, Akhan O, Giuliante F, et al. The ten commandments of he- patic radioembolization: expert discussion and re- port from Mediterranean Interventional Oncology (MIOLive) congress 2017. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2017;21(18):4014–21
  10. Wildes TM, O'Donovan A, Colloca GF, Cheung KL. Tumour boards in geriatric oncology. Age Ageing 2018;47(2):168–70
  11. Colloca G, Corsonello A, Marzetti E, Balducci L, Landi F, Extermann M, et al. Treating cancer in older and old- est old patients. C