KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Is Excess Free Cash Flow Over-Invested? Evidence from Borsa İstanbul

Levent ATAÜNAL
Aslı AYBARS
Sayfa
1–17
Yayın Tarihi
2017-07-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, this study adopted a directmethod to estimate investment opportunities available to the firm.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In a perfect capital market, investments should not be related to cash flows of the firm.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study, based on a panel data of 154 Borsa Istanbulfirms observed between 2005-2015, confirmed that firms over-invest when there is free cash flowavailable in excess of growth opportunities and dividends.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, this study adopted a directmethod to estimate investment opportunities available to the firm.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2005-2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Serbest nakit akışı hipotezi · Vekâlet teorisi · Temsil maliyeti

Özet

In a perfect capital market, investments should not be related to cash flows of the firm. Investmentsshould only be determined by the amount of renewal investments required and growth opportunitiesavailable to the firm. Contrarily, due to the conflicts of interest between the managers and theshareholders, the theory on agency costs and free cash flow hypothesis propose that managers areinclined to over-use free cash flow, which is in excess of value-adding investments. It is claimed thatfirms invest their extra free cash flow on projects with returns below cost of capital of the firm. Someprior studies made on the topic implied the validity of this hypothesis. In other words, firm’s resourcesmight be wasted by means of over-investing. This study, based on a panel data of 154 Borsa Istanbulfirms observed between 2005-2015, confirmed that firms over-invest when there is free cash flowavailable in excess of growth opportunities and dividends. Prior studies have used mostly regressionmodels or Tobin’s q to estimate investment prospects of the firm. However, this study adopted a directmethod to estimate investment opportunities available to the firm.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ATAÜNAL, L., AYBARS, A. (2017). Is Excess Free Cash Flow Over-Invested? Evidence from Borsa İstanbul. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 1–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/6385

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (23)

  1. ALLAYANNIS, G., and Mozumdar, A. (2004). The Impact of Negative Cash Flow and Influential Observations on Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity Estimates. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(5), 901-930.
  2. BERGSTRESSER, D. (2006). Discussion of “Overinvestment of Free Cash Flow”. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2-3), 191-202.
  3. BREUSCH, T. S., and Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  4. CARPENTER, R. E., and Guariglia, A. (2008).
  5. Cash Flow, Investment, and Investment Opportunities: New Tests Using Uk Panel Data. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1894-1906.
  6. CHANG, S. C., Chen, S. S., Hsing, A., and Huang, C. W. (2007).
  7. Investment Opportunities, Free Cash Flow, and Stock Valuation Effects of Secured Debt Offerings. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28(2), 123-145.
  8. CHEN, X., Sun, Y., and Xu, X. (2016).
  9. Free Cash Flow, Over-Investment and Corporate Governance in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 37, 81-103.
  10. DOUKAS, J. (1995).
  11. Overinvestment, Tobin’s q and Gains from Foreign Acquisitions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 19(7), 1285-1303.
  12. FAZZARI, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., Petersen, B. C., Blinder, A. S., and Poterba, J. M. (1988). Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988(1), 141-195.
  13. GUGLER, K., Mueller, D. C., and Yurtoglu, B. B. (2004).
  14. Marginal q, Tobin’s q, Cash Flow, and Investment.Southern Economic Journal, 70(3), 512-531.
  15. HAUSMAN, J. A., and Taylor, W. E. (1981). Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1377-1398.
  16. HOSHI, T., Kashyap, A., and Scharfstein, D. (1991).
  17. Corporate Structure, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(1), 33-60.
  18. HUBBARD, R. G. (1997). Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment (No. w5996). National Bureau of Economic Research. JENSEN, M. C. (1986).
  19. Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
  20. LANG, L. H., Stulz, R., and Walkling, R. A. (1991). A Test of The Free Cash Flow Hypothesis: The Case of Bidder Returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 29(2), 315-335.
  21. MODIGLIANI, F., and Miller, M. H. (1958).
  22. The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
  23. MORGADO, A., and Pind