Dergiler / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Biofilm Formation Capacities of Two Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus Epidermidis with and without icaA and icaD Genes on Intraocular Lenses

Sayfa
68–73
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The highest biofilm production was obtained on IOL C (PMMA) (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: To compare biofilm formations of two Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) isolates with known biofilm formationcapacities on four different intraocular lenses (IOL) that have not been studied before.Materials and Methods: Two isolates obtained from ocular surfaces and identified in previous studies and stored at -86 °C in 15%glycerol in the microbiology laboratory of the Anadolu University Department of Biology were purified and used in the study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The isolateswere S. epidermidis KA 15.8 (ICA+), a known biofilm producer isolate positive for icaA, icaD and bap genes, and S. epidermidis KA 14.5 (ICA-),known as a non-biofilm producer isolate negative for icaA, icaD and bap genes.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The highest biofilm production was obtained on IOL C (PMMA) (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: To compare biofilm formations of two Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) isolates with known biofilm formationcapacities on four different intraocular lenses (IOL) that have not been studied before.Materials and Methods: Two isolates obtained from ocular surfaces and identified in previous studies and stored at -86 °C in 15%glycerol in the microbiology laboratory of the Anadolu University Department of Biology were purified and used in the study. The isolateswere S. epidermidis KA 15.8 (ICA+), a known biofilm producer isolate positive for icaA, icaD and bap genes, and S. epidermidis KA 14.5 (ICA-),known as a non-biofilm producer isolate negative for icaA, icaD and bap genes. The biofilm formation capacities of the 2 isolates on 4 differentIOLs were compared. Two of the IOLs were acrylic (UD613 [IOL A], Turkey; SA60AT [IOL B], USA), and the other two were polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) (B60130C [IOL C], India; B55125C [IOL D], India). Bacterial enumeration and optical density measurements weredone from biofilms that formed on the IOLs. Biofilms were imaged using scanning electron microscopy.Results: Mean bacterial counts on the IOLs were 7.1±0.4 log10 CFU/mL with the ICA+ isolate, and 6.7±0.8 log10 CFU/mL with theICA- isolate; there were no statistically significant differences. Biofilm formation was lower with acrylic lenses than PMMA lenses withboth isolates (p=0.009 and p=0.013). The highest biofilm production was obtained on IOL C (PMMA) (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZMEN, A. T., KIVANÇ, M., KIVANÇ, S. A., KILIÇ, V., GÜLLÜLÜ, G. (2022). Comparison of Biofilm Formation Capacities of Two Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus Epidermidis with and without icaA and icaD Genes on Intraocular Lenses. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 68–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/637842

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Huang XD, Yao K, Zhang H, Huang XJ, Xu ZK. Surface modification of silicone intraocular lens by 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphoryl-choline binding to reduce Staphylococcus epidermidis adherence. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;35:462-467.
  2. Cağavi F, Akalan N, Celik H, Gür D, Guçiz B. Effect of hydrophilic coating on microorganism colonization in silicone tubing. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004;146:603-610.
  3. Nomura S, Lundberg F, Stollenwerk M, Nakamura K, Ljungh A. Adhesion of staphylococci to polymers with and without immobilized heparin in cerebrospinal fluid. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;38:35-42.
  4. Kıvanç SA, Kıvanç M, Bayramlar H. Microbiology of corneal wounds after cataract surgery: biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance patterns. J Wound Care. 2016;25:14-19.
  5. Weston K, Nicholson R, Bunce C, Yang YF. An 8-year retrospective study of cataract surgery and postoperative endophthalmitis: injectable intraocular lenses may reduce the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:1377-1380.
  6. Bausz M, Fodor E, Resch MD, Kristóf K. Bacterial contamination in the anterior chamber after povidone-iodine application and the effect of the lens implantation device. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1691-1695.
  7. Vafidis GC, Marsh RJ, Stacey AR. Bacterial contamination of intraocular lens surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1984;68:520-523.
  8. Fazly Bazzaz BS, Jalalzadeh M, Sanati M, Zarei-Ghanavati S, Khameneh B. Biofilm Formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis on Foldable and Rigid Intraocular Lenses. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014;7:e10020. Baillif S, Ecochard R, Casoli E, Freney J, Burillon C, Kodjikian L. Adherence and kinetics of biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis to different types of intraocular lenses under dynamic flow conditions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:153-158.
  9. Schroeder AC, Schmidbauer JM, Sobke A, Seitz B, Ruprecht KW, Herrmann M. Influence of fibronectin on the adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis to coated and uncoated intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:497-504.
  10. Prasad S, Nayak N, Satpathy G, Nag TC, Venkatesh P, Pandey RM. Biofilm: The Haven for Staphylococcus epidermidis in Post-operative Endophthalmitis. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;5:1-5.
  11. Kodjikian L, Burillon C, Lina G, Roques C, Pellon G, Freney J, Renaud FN. Biofilm formation on intraocular lenses by a clinical strain encoding the ica locus: a scanning electron microscopy study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4382-4387.
  12. Kivanc SA, Akova Budak B, Yildiz M, Kiv