Dergiler / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Collagen Crosslinking in Patients with Progressive Keratoconus by Ocular Response Analyzer

Sayfa
160–165
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Mean CCT was 484.43±41.26 µm preoperatively, 474.16±64.74 µm in the early postoperative period (p=0.70), and470.38±33.64 µm in the late postoperative period (p=0.71).Conclusion: CXL is a treatment modality believed to affect corneal biomechanics in keratoconus, but the results of larger patient serieswith longer follow-up periods may enable a better evaluation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: To evaluate corneal biomechanics before and after collagen crosslinking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus.Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, CXL was performed under topical anesthesia after removal of the epithelium (epiofftechnique) by applying ultraviolet A (UVA) light at a wavelength of 365 nm and power of 3 mW/cm2 or 5.4 joule/cm2.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Isoosmolar0.1% riboflavin solution was administered before and during UVA irradiation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Mean CCT was 484.43±41.26 µm preoperatively, 474.16±64.74 µm in the early postoperative period (p=0.70), and470.38±33.64 µm in the late postoperative period (p=0.71).Conclusion: CXL is a treatment modality believed to affect corneal biomechanics in keratoconus, but the results of larger patient serieswith longer follow-up periods may enable a better evaluation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate corneal biomechanics before and after collagen crosslinking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus.Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, CXL was performed under topical anesthesia after removal of the epithelium (epiofftechnique) by applying ultraviolet A (UVA) light at a wavelength of 365 nm and power of 3 mW/cm2 or 5.4 joule/cm2. Isoosmolar0.1% riboflavin solution was administered before and during UVA irradiation. In addition to ophthalmologic examination, ocularresponse analyzer measurements were performed pre- and postoperatively. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF),corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and central corneal thickness (CCT)were recorded.Results: The study included 35 eyes of 30 patients with progressive keratoconus. The mean age was 28.2±6.5 years and postoperativefollow-up time was 20.2±14.7 months (range: 6-74 months). The mean CH was 8.60±1.23 mmHg preoperatively, 8.96±2.05 mmHg inthe early postoperative period (1-6 months), (p=0.28) and 8.96±1.28 mmHg in the late postoperative period (10-29 months) (p=0.48).Mean CRF was 7.13±1.50 mmHg preoperatively, 8.48±2.16 mmHg in the early postoperative period (p=0.009), and 7.71±1.29mmHg in the late postoperative period (p=0.40). Mean IOPcc was 12.78±2.34 mmHg preoperatively, 15.38±4.21 mmHg in the earlypostoperative period (p=0.12) and 13.68±3.61 mmHg in the late postoperative period (p=0.48). Mean IOPg was 9.56±2.73 mmHgpreoperatively, 13.01±4.45 mmHg in the early postoperative period (p=0.046), and 10.86±3.47 mmHg in the late postoperativeperiod (p=0.44). Mean CCT was 484.43±41.26 µm preoperatively, 474.16±64.74 µm in the early postoperative period (p=0.70), and470.38±33.64 µm in the late postoperative period (p=0.71).Conclusion: CXL is a treatment modality believed to affect corneal biomechanics in keratoconus, but the results of larger patient serieswith longer follow-up periods may enable a better evaluation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILDIRIM, C. A., KÜÇÜMEN, R. B., ÇİFTÇİ, F., ŞAHAN, B. (2022). Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Collagen Crosslinking in Patients with Progressive Keratoconus by Ocular Response Analyzer. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 4, 160–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/637773

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Trazza S, Rosetta P, Vinciguerra R, Seiler T, Epstein D. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:369-378.
  2. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29:257-262.
  3. Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Hersh PS. In vivo biomechanical changes after corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: 1-year analysis of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Cornea. 2012;31:21-25.
  4. Spoerl E, Terai N, Scholz F, Raiskup F, Pillunat LE. Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking using Ocular Response Analyzer software. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:452-457.
  5. De Bernardo M, Capasso L, Tortori A, Lanza M, Caliendo L, Rosa N. Trans epithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus: 6 months follow up. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37:438-441.
  6. Sedaghat M, Naderi M, Zarei-Ghanavati M. Biomechanical parameters of the cornea after collagen crosslinking measured by waveform analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1728-1731.
  7. Kasumovic SS, Mavija M, Kasumovic A, Lepara O, Duric-Colic B, Cabric E, Muhamedagic L, Sakovic-Racic A, Jankov M. Intraocular Pressure Measurements Referring to the Corneal Thickness in Keratoconic Eyes After Corneal Crosslinking with Riboflavin and Ultraviolet A. Med Arch. 2015;69:334-338.
  8. Galletti JG, Pförtner T, Bonthoux FF. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:202-208.
  9. Mansouri K, Leite MT, Weinreb RN, Tafreshi A, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA. Association between corneal biomechanical properties and glaucoma severity. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:419-427.
  10. Abitbol O, Bouden J, Doan S, Hoang-Xuan T, Gatinel D. Corneal hysteresis measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88:116-119.
  11. Yenerel NM, Gorgun E, Kucumen RB, Oral D, Dinc UA, Ciftci F. Corneal biomechanical properties of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Cornea. 2011;30:983-986.
  12. Kucumen RB, Yenerel NM, Gorgun E, Kulacoglu DN, Oncel B, Kohen MC, Alimgil ML. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and intraoc