Dergiler / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

Surgical Outcomes of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane: The Gülhane Experience

Sayfa
75–80
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Correlation analysis showed that central macular thickness (r=0.69, p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: We aimed to report our experiences and outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery in idiopathic epiretinal membrane.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent vitreoretinal surgery for idiopathic epiretinalmembrane between January 2012 and 2014.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The patients’ pre- and postoperative visual acuity, slit-lamp examination findings, andoptical coherence tomography (OCT) images were evaluated.Results: Forty-five eyes of 45 patients (36% male, 64% female) were included (mean age, 69±8.2 years).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Correlation analysis showed that central macular thickness (r=0.69, p
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to report our experiences and outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery in idiopathic epiretinal membrane.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent vitreoretinal surgery for idiopathic epiretinalmembrane between January 2012 and 2014. The patients’ pre- and postoperative visual acuity, slit-lamp examination findings, andoptical coherence tomography (OCT) images were evaluated.Results: Forty-five eyes of 45 patients (36% male, 64% female) were included (mean age, 69±8.2 years). Mean postoperative follow-uptime was 7±4 (1-12) months. The mean preoperative logMAR best corrected visual acuity was 0.58±0.32 and postoperatively0.40±0.31, 0.33±0.33, 0.28±0.34 respectively at 3, 6, and 12 months. All OCT parameters showed statistically significantanatomical improvement at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Correlation analysis showed that central macular thickness (r=0.69, p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZGE, G., KÜÇÜKEVCİLİOĞLU, M., DURUKAN, A. H., ERDURMAN, F. C., AKINCIOĞLU, D. (2022). Surgical Outcomes of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane: The Gülhane Experience. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 75–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/637770

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Suh MH, Seo JM, Park KH, Yu HG. Associations between macular findings by optical coherence tomography and visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane removal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:473-480.
  2. Massin P, Allouch C, Haouchine B, Metge F, Paques M, Tangui L, Erginay A, Gaudric A. Optical coherence tomography of idiopathic macular epiretinal membranes before and after surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:732-739.
  3. Güngel H, Altan C, Osmanbaşoğlu Ö, Durgut E, Karaman S. Epiretinal Membran Cerrahisi Görsel Sonuçları ile Optik Koherens Tomografi Bulgularının İlişkisi. Ret-Vit 2010;18:269-274.
  4. Gandorfer A, Haritoglou C, Scheler R, Schumann R, Zhao F, Kampik A. Residual cellular proliferation on the internal limiting membrane in macular pucker surgery. Retina. 2012;32:477-485.
  5. Ahfat FG, Yuen CH, Groenewald CP. Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation following pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective study. Eye (Lond). 2003;17:16-20.
  6. Wensheng L, Wu R, Wang X, Xu M, Sun G, Sun C. Clinical complications of combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy for eyes with coexisting cataract and vitreoretinal diseases. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009;19:37-45.
  7. Dawson SR, Shunmugam M, Williamson TH. Visual acuity outcomes following surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: an analysis of data from 2001 to 2011. Eye. 2014;28:219-224.
  8. Rahman R, Stephenson J. Early surgery for epiretinal membrane preserves more vision for patients. Eye (Lond). 2014;28:410-414.
  9. Cherfan GM, Michels RG, de Bustros S, Enger C, Glaser BM. Nuclear sclerotic cataract after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes causing macular pucker. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:434-438.
  10. Inoue M, Morita S, Watanabe Y, Kaneko T, Yamane S, Kobayashi S, Arakawa A, Kadonosono K. Preoperative inner segment/outer segment junction in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography as a prognostic factor in epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina. 2011;31:1366-1372.
  11. Fraser-Bell S, Guzowski M, Rochtchina E, Wang JJ, Mitchell P. Five-year cumulative incidence and progression of epiretinal membranes: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:34-40.
  12. Qiao H, Hisatomi T, Sonoda KH, Kura S, Sassa Y, Kinoshita S, Nakamura T, Sakamoto T, Ishibashi T. The characterisation of hyalocytes: the origin, phenotype, and turnover. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:513-517.
  13. Smiddy WE, Michels RG, Glaser BM, deBustros S. Vitrectomy for macular traction caused by incomplete vitreous separation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:624-628.
  14. Snead DR, James S,