KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2

ASYMMETRY IN INFLATION TARGETING

Pınar DENİZ
Erhan ASLANOĞLU
Sayfa
391–412
Yayın Tarihi
2020-01-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Asymmetric reactions to interest rate, output and exchange rate are observed which are suggesting changes in the monetary preferences of Central Bank of Republic of Turkey.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Following the world financial crisis beginning in the last quarter of 2008, aggregate demand and commodity prices have declined sharply leading to a fast decline in world inflation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In 2002, the Central Bank of Republic of Turkey adopted inflation targeting (in the implicit form) to maintain price stability.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Asymmetric reactions to interest rate, output and exchange rate are observed which are suggesting changes in the monetary preferences of Central Bank of Republic of Turkey.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Inflation Targeting · Structural Break · Asymmetry

Özet

Following the world financial crisis beginning in the last quarter of 2008, aggregate demand and commodity prices have declined sharply leading to a fast decline in world inflation. This different and new period reflects the rise in risk appetite leading to high fluctuations in the short term capital flows. World central banks revised their monetary policy to the changing conditions taking into account financial stability. In 2002, the Central Bank of Republic of Turkey adopted inflation targeting (in the implicit form) to maintain price stability. After 2008, parallel to the developments in global markets, the Turkish economy reflects decline in inflation rates. Together with the changes in the economic conditions, estimating monetary policy models in the form of constant-coefficient and symmetric specification may lead to erroneous interpretations. This study analyzes the existence of structural break(s) and asymmetric behavior for the 2003-2016 period. The paper also examines the monetary policy model under the New Keynesian DSGE model. The Turkish monetary policy investigated for the period presents October 2009 as the break point under different models and structural break tests. Asymmetric reactions to interest rate, output and exchange rate are observed which are suggesting changes in the monetary preferences of Central Bank of Republic of Turkey.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DENİZ, P., ASLANOĞLU, E. (2020). ASYMMETRY IN INFLATION TARGETING. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2, 391–412. https://ajindex.com/articles/6323

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. BINICI, M., Kara, H., and Ozlu, P., 2016. Faiz Koridoru ve Banka Faizleri: Parasal Aktarım Mekanizmasina Dair Bazı Bulgular, Central Bank of Republic of Turkey Working Papers, No. 1608. ANDREWS, D. W., 1993. Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 821-856.
  2. ANDREWS, D. W., and Ploberger, W., 1994. Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 1383-1414.
  3. BAI, J., 1997. Estimation of a change point in multiple regression models. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 551-563.
  4. BAI, J., and Perron, P., 1998. Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica: 47-78.
  5. BEC, F., M.B. Salem, F. Collard, 2002. “Asymmetries in monetary policy reaction function: Evidence for the US, French and German central banks”, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, Vol. 6(2): 1-22.
  6. BENLIALPER, A. Cömert, H., Öcal, N., 2015. “Asymmetric Exchange Rate Policy in Inflation Targeting Developing Countries”, mimeo. http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/v_2015_10_23_benlialper.pdf, (Accessed 12 December 2016).
  7. BERUMENT, H., 2007. Measuring monetary policy for a small open economy: Turkey, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 29: 411–430.
  8. BERUMENT, H. K. Malatyali, 2000. The implicit reaction function of the Central Bank of Republic of Turkey, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 7: 425–430.
  9. CHOW, G. C., 1960. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 591-605.
  10. ÇEBI, C., 2012. The interaction between monetary and fiscal policies in Turkey: An estimated New Keynesian DSGE model. Economic Modelling, Vol. 29 (4): 1258-1267.
  11. GEYIK, E. Ü., 2011. A test for asymmetric central bank preferences in Turkey, Internatıonal Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Studies, Vol 3 (2): 179-191.
  12. GÜRKAYNAK, R. S., Kantur, Z., Taş, M. A., & Yıldırım, S. (2015). Monetary policy in Turkey after Central Bank independence, 30(356): 9-38.
  13. HASANOV, M., and Omay, T., 2008. Monetary policy rules in practice: Re-examining the case of Turkey. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 387(16): 4309-4318.
  14. HASANOV, M., and Omay, T., 2008. Nonlinearities in emerging stock markets: evidence from Europe’s two largest emerging markets. Applied Economics, 40(20): 2645-2658.
  15. JUSTINIANO, A., and Preston, B., 2010. Monetary policy and uncer