KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4

Türkiye'deki bit faunasının mevcut durumu

Current knowledge of Turkey's louse fauna

Önder DÜZLÜ
Alparslan YILDIRIM
Abdullah İNCİ
Bilal DİK
Sayfa
212–220
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Among the mammalian lice, a total of 20 species belonging to 8 genera were identified in Anoplura. 8 species belonging to 3 genera in Ischnocera were determined and 2 species belonging to 2 genera were detected in Amblycera in the mammalian lice.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The current knowledge on the louse fauna of birds and mammals in Turkey has not yet been completed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Up to the present, a total of 109 species belonging to 50 genera of lice have been recorded from animals and humans, according to the morphological identification.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Among the mammalian lice, a total of 20 species belonging to 8 genera were identified in Anoplura. 8 species belonging to 3 genera in Ischnocera were determined and 2 species belonging to 2 genera were detected in Amblycera in the mammalian lice.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The current knowledge on the louse fauna of birds and mammals in Turkey has not yet been completed. Up to the present, a total of 109 species belonging to 50 genera of lice have been recorded from animals and humans, according to the morphological identification. Among the avian lice, a total of 43 species belonging to 22 genera were identified in Ischnocera (Philopteridae). 35 species belonging to 14 genera in Menoponidae were detected and only 1 species was found in Laemobothriidae in Amblycera. Among the mammalian lice, a total of 20 species belonging to 8 genera were identified in Anoplura. 8 species belonging to 3 genera in Ischnocera were determined and 2 species belonging to 2 genera were detected in Amblycera in the mammalian lice.

Abstract

Türkiye'deki kuşlarda ve memelilerde bulunan bit türlerinin mevcut durumu henüz daha tamamlanmamıştır. Bugüne kadar insan ve hayvanlarda morfolojik olarak teşhis edilen 50 cinste 109 bit türü bildirilmiştir. Kanatlı bitleri arasında, 22 cinse ait toplam 43 tür Ischnocera'da tespit edilmiştir. Amblycera'da ise Menoponidae familyasında 14 cinste 35 tür saptanırken, Laemobothriidae familyasında yalnızca bir tür bulunmuştur. Memeli bitleri arasında Anoplura'da 8 cinste 20 tür tespit edilmiştir. Yine memeli bitleri arasında Ischnocera'da 3 cinste 8 tür saptanırken, Amblycera'da 2 cinste 2 tür bulunmuştur.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DÜZLÜ, Ö., YILDIRIM, A., İNCİ, A., DİK, B. (2022). Türkiye'deki bit faunasının mevcut durumu. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4, 212–220. https://ajindex.com/articles/630523

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Cranston PS, Gullan PJ. Phylogeny of insects. In. Resh VH, Cavde RT eds. Encyclopedia of Insects. 2nd edition, Elsevier, San Diego, pp.2009; 780-93
  2. Beutel RG, Gorb S. Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny. J Zool Syst Evol Res, 2001; 39: 177-207
  3. Pass G, Krenn BAG, Merl M, Plant J, Szucsich NU, Tögel M, 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of the Ordes of Hexapoda: Contributions from the Circulatory Organ for a Morphological Data Matrix. Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny, 2006; 64: 165-203
  4. Wheeler WC, Whiting M, Wheeler QD, Carpenter JC. The phylogeny of the extant hexapod orders. Cladistics,1997; 17: 113-69
  5. Yoshizawa K. Phylogeny and higher classifi cation of suborder Psocomorpha (Insecta: Psocodea: ‘Psocoptera’). Zool J Linnean Soc, 2002; 136: 371-400
  6. Clay T. Some problems in the evolution of a group of ectoparasites. Evolution, 1949; 3: 279-99
  7. Yoshizawa K, Johnson KP. Phylogenetic position of Phthiraptera (Insecta: Paraneoptera) and elevated rate of evolution in mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003; 29: 102-14
  8. Kim I, Lee EM, Seol KY, Yun EY, Lee YB, Hwang JS, Jin BR. The mitochondrial genome of the Korean hairstreak, Coreanaraphaelis, (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Insect Mol Biol, 2006; 15: 217-25
  9. Murrell A, Barker SC. Multiple origins of parasitism in lice: phylogenetic analysis of SSU rDNA indicates that the Phthiraptera and Psocoptera are not monophyletic. Parasitol Res, 2005; 97: 274-80
  10. Cameron SL, Beckenbach AT, Dowton M, Whiting MF. Evidence from mitochondrial genomics on interordinal relationshipsin insects. Arthrop System Phylogen, 2006; 64: 27-34
  11. Yoshizawa K, Johnson KP. Morphology of male genitalia in lice and their relatives and phylogenetic implications. Systematic Entomology, 2006; 31: 350-61
  12. Systema Naturae. The Taxonomicon, Universal Taxonomic Services, Amsterdam. Retrieval: [http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/TaxonTree. aspx?id=18354&tree=0.1] Retrieval Date: 24.02.2011
  13. Bush SE, Harbison CW, Slager DL, Peterson AT, Price RD, Clayton DH. Geographic variation in the community structure of lice on western scrub-jays. J Parasitol, 2009; 95: 10-3
  14. Aksın N. The Presence of lice species on wild geese in the Elazıg District. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 2004; 28: 87-90
  15. Merdivenci A. Türkiye’nin entomolojik coğrafyası. Ege Üniv Tıp Fak Yayını. 1965; 42: 114-92
  16. Dik B. Chewing lice