KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Skin Scraping and Standard Superficial Skin Biopsy in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Scabies

Orçun ZORBOZAN
Ayşegül ÜNVER
Seray TÖZ
Nevin TURGAY
Bengü Gerçeker TÜRK
Ayda ACAR
Göktürk ORALOĞLU
İdil ÜNAL
Sayfa
164–167
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to our results, SSSB is an inexpensive and easy-to-apply method with high sensitivity for obtaining skin samples for scabies laboratory diagnosis.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Scabies is diagnosed based on the presence of burrows on the skin, Sarcoptes scabiei adult, egg, or scybala in skin scrapings.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We aimed to compare the analytical performance of skin scraping and standard superficial skin biopsy (SSSB) and to investigate the correlation with false negative results in the laboratory diagnosis of scabies.Methods: Skin scraping and SSSB were applied from July 1 to December 31, 2018 on 42 patients whose burrows were marked using dermatoscopy, as obtained from the laboratory information system.Results: The number of patients who tested positive for scabies with skin scraping was 18 (42.9%) and 24 (57.1%) with SSSB, and the difference was significant (p=0.003).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to our results, SSSB is an inexpensive and easy-to-apply method with high sensitivity for obtaining skin samples for scabies laboratory diagnosis.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Scabies is diagnosed based on the presence of burrows on the skin, Sarcoptes scabiei adult, egg, or scybala in skin scrapings. The laboratory diagnosis of scabies poses various challenges. We aimed to compare the analytical performance of skin scraping and standard superficial skin biopsy (SSSB) and to investigate the correlation with false negative results in the laboratory diagnosis of scabies.Methods: Skin scraping and SSSB were applied from July 1 to December 31, 2018 on 42 patients whose burrows were marked using dermatoscopy, as obtained from the laboratory information system.Results: The number of patients who tested positive for scabies with skin scraping was 18 (42.9%) and 24 (57.1%) with SSSB, and the difference was significant (p=0.003). Sensitivity was 42.9% for skin scraping and 57.1% for SSSB. The number of positive cases with both techniques was 15 (35.7%). The number of patients positive with only skin scraping was 3 (7.1%) and only SSSB was 9 (21.4%).Conclusion: To date, it has seemed impossible to diagnose scabies using a single clinical or laboratory test. According to our results, SSSB is an inexpensive and easy-to-apply method with high sensitivity for obtaining skin samples for scabies laboratory diagnosis.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ZORBOZAN, O., ÜNVER, A., TÖZ, S., TURGAY, N., TÜRK, B. G., ACAR, A., ORALOĞLU, G., ÜNAL, İ. (2022). Comparison of Skin Scraping and Standard Superficial Skin Biopsy in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Scabies. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 164–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/629969

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Khalil S, Abbas O, Kibbi AG, Kurban M. Scabies in the age of increasing drug resistance. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017; 11: e0005920
  2. Walton SF, Currie BJ. Problems in diagnosing scabies, a global disease in human and animal populations. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007; 20: 268-79
  3. Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Delfino M. Epiluminescence microscopy. A new approach to in vivo detection of Sarcoptes scabiei. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133: 751-3
  4. Walter B, Heukelbach J, Fengler G, Worth C, Hengge U, Feldmeier H. Comparison of dermoscopy, skin scraping, and the adhesive tape test for the diagnosis of scabies in a resource-poor setting. Arch Dermatol 2011; 147: 468-73
  5. Ong CY, Vasanwala FF. Infected with scabies again? Focus in management in long-term care facilities. Diseases 2018; 7: 3
  6. Cassell JA, Middleton J, Nalabanda A, Lanza S, Head MG, Bostock J, et al. Scabies outbreaks in ten care homes for elderly people: A prospective study of clinical features, epidemiology, and treatment outcomes. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18: 894-902
  7. Thomas J, Peterson GM, Walton SF, Carson CF, Naunton M, Baby KE. Scabies: an ancient global disease with a need for new therapies. BMC Inf Dis 2015; 15: 250
  8. Engelman D, Steer AC. Control strategies for scabies. Trop Med Infect Dis 2018; 3: 98
  9. Chosidow O. Clinical practices. Scabies. New Eng J Med 2006; 354: 1718-27
  10. Johnston G, Sladden M. Scabies: diagnosis and treatment. BMJ 2005; 331: 619-22
  11. Arlian LG, Morgan MS. A review of Sarcoptes scabiei: past, present and future. Parasites Vectors 2017; 10: 297
  12. Jacks SK, Lewis EA, Witman PM. The Curette Prep: A modification of the traditional scabies preparation. Pediatr Dermatol 2012; 29: 544-5
  13. Yélamos O, Mir-Bonafé JF, López-Ferrer A, Garcia-Muret MP, Alegre M, Puig L. Crusted (Norwegian) scabies: an under-recognized infestation characterized by an atypical presentation and delayed diagnosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 30: 483-5
  14. Hylwa SA, Loss L, Grassi M. Crusted scabies and tinea corporis after treatment of presumed bullous pemphigoid. Cutis 2013; 92: 193-8
  15. Forton FMN, De Maertelaer V. Two consecutive standardized skin surface biopsies: an improved sampling method to evaluate Demodex density as a diagnostic tool for rosacea and demodicosis. Acta Derm Venereol 2017; 97: 242-8
  16. Neynaber S, Muehlstaedt M, Flaig MJ, Herzinger T. Use of Superficial Cyanoacrylate Biopsy (SCAB) as an Alternative for Mite Identification in Scabies. Arch Dermatol 2008